Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBRAIN

In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Three MR Measurement Methods for Calculating Vascular Shear Stress in the Internal Carotid Artery

Anthony M. Masaryk, Richard Frayne, Orhan Unal, Elizabeth Krupinski and Charles M. Strother
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 1999, 20 (2) 237-245;
Anthony M. Masaryk
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Richard Frayne
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Orhan Unal
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Elizabeth Krupinski
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Charles M. Strother
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

References

  1. ↵
    Caro CG, Fitz-Gerald JM, Schroter RC. Atheroma and arterial wall shear: observation, correlation and proposal of a shear dependent mass transfer mechanism for atherogenesis. Proc R Soc Lond B [Biol] 1971;177:109-159
    PubMed
  2. Orel VE. Mechanochemiemission and atherogenesis. Med Hypotheses 1995;45:343-344
    PubMed
  3. Fry DL. Acute vascular endothelial changes associated with increased blood velocity gradients. Circ Res 1968;22:165-197
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. Langille BL. Blood flow-induced remodeling of the artery wall. In: Bevan JA, Kaley G, Rubanyi GM, eds. Flow Dependent Regulation of Vascular Function. Clinical Physiology Series of the American Physiological Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1995;13:277-297
  5. ↵
    Song SM, Leahy RM, Boyd DP, Brundage BH, Napel S. Determining cardiac velocity fields and intraventricular pressure distribution from a sequence of ultrafast CT cardiac images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 1994;13:386-397
    PubMed
  6. Adler RS, Chenevert TL, Fowlkes B, Pipe J, Rubin JM. Calculation of pressure gradients from MR velocity data in a laminar flow model. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1991;15:483-488
    PubMed
  7. ↵
    Bird RB, Stewart WE, Lightfoot EN. Transport Phenomena. New York: Wiley; 1960;71-122
  8. ↵
    Ku DN, Giddens DP, Zairns CZ, Glagov S. Pulsatile flow and atherosclerosis in the human carotid bifurcation: positive correlation between plaque localization and low and oscillating shear stress. Arteriosclerosis 1985;5:293-302
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  9. ↵
    Zarins CK, Giddens DP, Bharadvaj BK, Sottiural VS, Mbon RJ, Glgov S. Carotid bifurcation atherosclerosis: quantitative correlation of plaque localization with flow velocity profiles and wall shear stress. Circ Res 1983;53:502-514
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. Friedman MH, Hutchins GM, Bargeron CB, Deters OJ, Mark FF. Correlation between intimal thickness and fluid shear in human arteries. Atherosclerosis 1981;39:425-436
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  11. Burleson AC, Strother CM, Turitto VT. Computer modeling of intracranial saccular and lateral aneurysms for the study of their hemodynamics. Neurosurgery 1995;37:774-782
    PubMed
  12. Rossitti S, Svendsen P. Shear stress in cerebral arteries supplying arteriovenous malformations. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 1995;137:138-145
    CrossRefPubMed
  13. ↵
    Strother CM. Understanding the natural history of cerebral aneurysms.. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1183-1184
  14. Hademos GJ, Massoud TF, Vinuela F. A biomathematical model of intracranial arteriovenous malformations based on electrical network analysis: theory and hemodynamics. Neurosurgery 1996;38:1005-1014
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. ↵
    Moran PR. A flow velocity zeugmatographic interlace for NMR imaging in humans. Magn Reson Imaging 1982;1:197-203
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. Dumoulin CL, Souza SP, Walker MF, Wagle W. Three dimensional phase contrast angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1989;9:139-149
  17. Moore JA, Steinman DA, Ethier CR. Computational blood flow modelling: errors associated with reconstructing finite element models from magnetic resonance images. J Biomech 1998;31:179-184
    PubMedWeb of Science
  18. ↵
    Urchuk SN, Plewes DB. MR measurement of pulsatile pressure gradients. J Magn Reson Imaging 1994;4:829-836
    PubMed
  19. ↵
    Oshinski JN, Ku DN, Mukundan S, Loth F, Pettigrew RI. Determination of wall shear stress in the aorta using MR phase velocity mapping. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:640-647
    PubMedWeb of Science
  20. Oyre S, Pedersen EM, Ringgaard S, Boesiger Paaske WP. In vivo wall shear stress measured by magnetic resonance velocity mapping in the human abdominal aorta. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg 1997;13:263-271
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  21. ↵
    Frayne R, Rutt BK. Measurement of fluid-shear rate by Fourier-encoded velocity imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:378-387
    PubMed
  22. ↵
    Steinman DA, Smith RF, Ethier CR, Rutt BK. Wall shear stress via MR: linear or quadratic extrapolation? In: Proceedings of the Society for Magnetic Resonance, Nice, France, 1995: 322
  23. ↵
    Lou Z, Yang WJ, Stein PD. Errors in the estimation of arterial wall shear rates that result from curve fitting of velocity profiles.. J Biomech 1993;26:383-390
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  24. ↵
    Polzin JA, Korosec FR, Wedding KL, et al. Effect of through-plane myocardial motion on phase-difference and complex difference measurements of absolute coronary artery flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 1996;6:113-123
    PubMed
  25. ↵
    Hamilton CA. Correction of partial volume inaccuracies in quantitative phase contrast MR angiography. Magn Reson Imaging 1994;12:1127-1130
    PubMed
  26. ↵
    Rickey DW, Picot PA, Christopher DA, Fenster A. A wall-less vessel phantom for Doppler ultrasound studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 1995;21:1163-1176
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  27. ↵
    Frayne R, Holdsworth DW, Gowman LM, et al. A computer-controlled flow simulator for MR flow experiments. J Magn Reson Imaging 1992;2:605-612
    PubMed
  28. ↵
    Frayne R, Steinman DA, Ethier CR, Rutt BK. Accuracy of MR phase contrast velocity measurements for unsteady flow. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:428-431
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  29. ↵
    Milnor WR. Hemodynamic. 2nd ed. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1982;347-348
  30. Nichols WW, O'Rourke MF. McDonald's Blood Flow in Arteries.. Philadelphia: Lea & Febiger; 1990;36-38
  31. ↵
    Keppel G. Design and Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall; 1982;157-159
  32. ↵
    Frayne R, Rutt BK. Frequency response of retrospectively gated phase contrast MRI: effect of interpolation. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:908-917
  33. ↵
    Ku DN, Phillips DJ, Giddens DP, Strandness DE. Hemodynamics of the normal human carotid bifurcation: in vitro and in vivo studies. Ultrasound Med Biol 1985;11:13-26
    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
  34. ↵
    Duncan DD, Bargeron CB, Borchardt SE, et al. The effect of compliance on wall shear in casts of a human aortic bifurcation. J Biomech Eng 1990;112:183-188
    PubMedWeb of Science
  35. ↵
    Friedman MH, Bargeron CB, Duncan DD, Hutchins GM, Mark FF. Effects of arterial compliance and non-Newtonian rheology on correlations between intimal thickness and wall shear. J Biomech Eng 1992;114:317-320
    PubMedWeb of Science
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 20, Issue 2
1 Feb 1999
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Three MR Measurement Methods for Calculating Vascular Shear Stress in the Internal Carotid Artery
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Anthony M. Masaryk, Richard Frayne, Orhan Unal, Elizabeth Krupinski, Charles M. Strother
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Three MR Measurement Methods for Calculating Vascular Shear Stress in the Internal Carotid Artery
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1999, 20 (2) 237-245;

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
In Vitro and In Vivo Comparison of Three MR Measurement Methods for Calculating Vascular Shear Stress in the Internal Carotid Artery
Anthony M. Masaryk, Richard Frayne, Orhan Unal, Elizabeth Krupinski, Charles M. Strother
American Journal of Neuroradiology Feb 1999, 20 (2) 237-245;
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • Methods
    • Results
    • Discussion
    • Conclusion
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • In Vivo Wall Shear Stress Distribution in the Carotid Artery: Effect of Bifurcation Geometry, Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis, and Recanalization Therapy
  • Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Features of the Disruption-Prone and the Disrupted Carotid Plaque
  • Crossref
  • Google Scholar

This article has not yet been cited by articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

More in this TOC Section

  • Enhanced Axonal Metabolism during Early Natalizumab Treatment in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis
  • SWI or T2*: Which MRI Sequence to Use in the Detection of Cerebral Microbleeds? The Karolinska Imaging Dementia Study
  • Progression of Microstructural Damage in Spinocerebellar Ataxia Type 2: A Longitudinal DTI Study
Show more BRAIN

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire