Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleBrain
Open Access

Hemodynamic Alterations in Vertebrobasilar Large Artery Disease Assessed by Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging

B.J. MacIntosh, L. Marquardt, U.G. Schulz, P. Jezzard and P.M. Rothwell
American Journal of Neuroradiology November 2012, 33 (10) 1939-1944; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A3090
B.J. MacIntosh
aFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (B.J.M., L.M., U.G.S., P.J., P.M.R.), University of Oxford, Oxford, England
bHeart and Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery (B.J.M.), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
bHeart and Stroke Foundation Centre for Stroke Recovery (B.J.M.), Sunnybrook Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
L. Marquardt
aFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (B.J.M., L.M., U.G.S., P.J., P.M.R.), University of Oxford, Oxford, England
dDepartment of Neurology (L.M.), University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
U.G. Schulz
aFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (B.J.M., L.M., U.G.S., P.J., P.M.R.), University of Oxford, Oxford, England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Jezzard
aFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (B.J.M., L.M., U.G.S., P.J., P.M.R.), University of Oxford, Oxford, England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P.M. Rothwell
aFrom the Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences (B.J.M., L.M., U.G.S., P.J., P.M.R.), University of Oxford, Oxford, England
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF
Loading

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: VB artery stenosis is associated with a high risk of recurrent ischemic events, and knowledge about the hemodynamic relevance of VB stenosis is important for clinical decision making. In this study, multiple inflow pulsed ASL MR imaging was assessed for its ability to measure CBF and ATT in patients with VB disease.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: ASL was performed on a 3T MR imaging scanner in 41 participants. Twenty-one patients had a history of ischemic events in the VB circulation (14 men, 7 women, age 66 ± 11 years). Clinical data and CE-MRA were used to classify VB disease severity. Twenty age-matched adults were controls. Group and within-VB analyses were performed. Mean CBF and ATT values in the ROIs were adjusted by excluding voxels that did not produce a reliable ASL estimate.

RESULTS: CBF was reduced (P < .003) in patients compared with controls, which was significant after excluding voxels with a poor fit. Differences in ATT between patients and controls were not significant after voxel correction. There was a strong correlation between CBF and ATT among patients. Finally, ATT was significantly correlated with VB disease severity (P = .026).

CONCLUSIONS: Multiple inflow ASL distinguished patients with VB disease from age matched-controls. VB disease rating was associated with prolonged ATT downstream. ASL may have diagnostic potential among patients in whom risk of intervention is high.

ABBREVIATIONS:

ASL
arterial spin-labeling
ATT
arterial transit time
CE-MRA
contrast-enhanced MRA
GRASE
gradient and spin echo
MNI
Montreal Neurological Institute
Q2TIPS
quantitative imaging of perfusion with a single subtraction with thin-section TI1 periodic saturation
sig
significant
VB
vertebrobasilar

ASL MR imaging has gained clinical interest because of its ability to quantitatively image perfusion without the use of an injected contrast agent.1,2 In ASL, blood water is labeled magnetically in the proximal arteries to produce perfusion-weighted image contrast when the labeled blood reaches the imaging region.3 ASL data are often acquired by using a single inflow period to quantify perfusion, requiring assumed knowledge of the bolus transit time, defined here as the arterial transit time (ATT; in units of seconds). This approach is justified for healthy patients but might be problematic in cerebrovascular diseases where arterial flow is atypical or delayed, as in the case of ischemic scenarios.2,4 Recent work illustrates the value of multiple inflow ASL to extract both CBF and ATT information5⇓–7

The current study focused on symptomatic VB circulation. In contrast to carotid circulation, the impact of stenotic disease on brain perfusion in VB circulation has not been reported in the literature thus far. ASL studies have shown that it is possible to assess perfusion specifically for the posterior circulation in the occipital region.8,9 Patients with VB stenotic disease have a high risk of recurrent ischemic events.10⇓–12 In addition, intervention in VB stenotic disease is associated with a high procedural risk and its benefit is currently the object of clinical trials (eg, Vertebral Artery Ischemia Stent Placement Trial, Vertebral Artery Stent Placement Trial). Information about the hemodynamic relevance of VB stenotic disease may help target candidates suitable for revascularization by identifying patients with poor cerebral perfusion. In the current study, we hypothesize it is possible to use multiple inflow ASL to distinguish patients with VB circulation ischemic events from age-matched controls. From the multiple inflow ASL, we are able to produce images of CBF and ATT. In addition, we estimate the proportion of ASL voxels that produced significant estimates for the hemodynamic parameters. Finally, we hypothesize that ASL data will be correlated with VB disease severity.

Materials and Methods

Patients and Controls

In this cross-sectional observational study, we enrolled patients who attended the TIA clinic of the John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, United Kingdom, with a previous diagnosis of TIA or minor stroke in the VB circulation. Standardized clinical data, including previous medical history and vascular risk factors, were recorded. Patients had brain MR imaging (standard stroke protocol, including T2, T2*, FLAIR, DWI) and vascular imaging of the cervical and proximal intracranial vessels with CE-MRA. All patients had their event at least 2 months before undergoing ASL perfusion imaging.

Three neurologists (L.M., U.S., P.M.R.) independently reviewed the clinical and radiologic data and categorized the patients into 3 groups according to the presence and degree of severity of any VB stenotic disease. In cases of disagreement, a consensus was sought. Group 1 included patients with a VB circulation ischemic event but no evidence of VB stenosis (no VB) on CE-MRA. Group 2 patients had moderate VB stenosis (moderate VB) on CE-MRA. Group 2 included patients with unilateral vertebral artery stenosis and/or good collateral flow from the anterior circulation. Finally, group 3 consisted of patients with severe VB disease (severe VB), described by bilateral vertebral artery stenosis or occlusion and/or significant basilar artery stenosis, with little to no evidence of cross-flow from the anterior to posterior circulation via the circle of Willis. The control cohort consisted of 20 age-matched and sex-matched participants with no known history of cerebrovascular disease or stroke. The local ethics committee approved the study.

MR Imaging

ASL MR imaging was performed on a 3T MR imaging system (Tim Trio; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) using a 12-channel head receive coil. Pulse sequences with imaging parameters included 1) pulsed ASL perfusion imaging (TR/TE = 3216/40 ms in 8 of 21 patients and TR/TE = 3166/23 ms for remaining patients/participants; 200 × 200 × 130 mm field of view; 26 sections; 3.1 × 3.1 × 5 mm3 voxels; 5/8 partial k-space; 10 inversion times; inflow time, 10 control-tag difference pairs for a 10.5-minute scan duration), 2) diffusion-weighted imaging (TR/TE = 4400/93 ms; 27 sections; 1.6 × 1.6 × 3 mm3 voxels; b-value = 0,1000s/mm2), 3) FLAIR (TR/TI/TE = 13,970/2500/94 ms; 27 sections; 1 × 1 × 2.5 mm3 voxels), and 4) T1-weighted anatomic images (TR/TE = 1250/4.6 ms; 44 slabs; 3D turbo fast low-angle shot; 2x parallel imaging; 1 × 1 × 2.5 mm3 voxels). Flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery-pulsed ASL was used to create section-selective (control) and nonselective (tag) images and to consequently tag a large volume of arterial blood water. The tagging geometry was designed so that the section-selective tagging volume was 10% larger than the field of view along z (FOVz; ie, 121-mm slab thickness versus 110 mm for FOVz). This leads to a 5.5-mm gap between the tag region and the imaging slab. In addition, 2 background suppression inversion pulses were used to null gray and white matter signal. The method of Q2TIPS was used to constrain the maximum duration of the ASL label. Although a Q2TIPS TI1 value of 1.6 s was used for all experiments, in practice, we find that for this duration of inflow time 1, the extent of the radio-frequency transmit coil profile acts as an effective limit to the bolus duration. The remaining uncertainty in inflow time 1 was therefore included in the fitting of the data to the kinetic model.13 ASL imaging was performed using 3D GRASE.13,14 Data were collected over a range of inflow times to produce an ASL time series. The first and last inflow times were 400 ms and 2200 ms, respectively, for the patients, with 200-ms increments, and 400 ms and 2100 ms, respectively, for the controls, with 170-ms increments. ASL parametric estimates were 1) CBF (mL/100 g/min), and 2) ATT (s). A reference ASL image (18 seconds) was acquired without any arterial labeling preparation to calculate the initial magnetization of arterial blood water.

Data Processing

ASL images were processed by using tools supplied by the FSL. Spatial smoothing involved a full width at half maximum smoothing filter of 6 mm. Perfusion-weighted difference images were calculated by using sinc-interpolated subtraction for control and tag images at each inflow time.15 Difference images were averaged at each inflow time. A single-compartment 2-parameter model16 was implemented in Matlab (MathWorks, Natick, Massachusetts) to calculate CBF and ATT voxelwise. Model parameters included bolus duration = 900 ms, which was verified empirically, as in,13 T1,blood = 1500 ms, T1,tissue = 1300 ms. Goodness-of-fit was assessed on a voxel-by-voxel basis using the confidence intervals that were generated from the model fitting for CBF and ATT, as defined by the following criteria: 1) if the CBF estimate minus the 95% lower-bound confidence interval was greater than zero, the fit to the CBF parameter was considered significant (CBF-sig), and 2) if the ATT estimate plus the 95% upper-bound confidence interval was less than the longest inflow value (TImax), the fit to the ATT fit was considered significant (ATT-sig). TImax was 2200 ms for patients and 2100 ms for controls. The percentage of significant voxels within the ROI was determined for the CBF and ATT data, denoted as percent CBF-sig voxels and percent ATT-sig voxels, respectively.

CBF images were converted to absolute units (ie, mL/100 g/min) by conducting the following steps: 1) estimating the initial arterial blood magnetization (M0,blood) from a ROI in the ventricles and using a proton attenuation ratio for tissue and CSF, 2) correcting for the receiver coil sensitivity across the brain, 3) correcting for the T2 difference between CSF and tissue by incorporating the following ratio expression: exp(−TE/T2,blood)/exp(−TE/T2,CSF),17 and 4) assuming a labeling efficiency (ε = 0.81) associated with 2 background suppression pulses in pulsed ASL.18 T1-weighted anatomic images were collected in the same orientation as the ASL data to facilitate registration to MNI standard space. ROIs in occipital and parietal gray matter shown in Fig 1 were selected from the MNI structural atlas that is available in FSLview. The ROIs were warped to the individual patient coordinate space and voxels were included in the ROI if they had a significant fit for CBF or ATT.

Fig 1.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 1.

Axial CBF (left; mL/100 g/min) and ATT (middle left; seconds) images. A, A representative control shows anterior and posterior regions had a longer ATT compared with middle cerebral territory, while CBF was relatively uniform across the cortex. B, Patient 16 (P16; no VB) had normal CBF and ATT patterns. C, P2 (mod VB) has reduced CBF and prolonged ATT in the posterior portion of the cortex. A patient with severe VB disease (sev VB, P1) also showed reduced CBF and prolonged ATT. Voxels with zero intensity in C-D occurred due to poor fitting. The 2 right columns show the standard space ROIs that were altered to include only voxels that showed a significant fit for CBF or ATT.

Statistics

SPSS was used to perform statistical analyses (SPSS 19, SPSS, Chicago, Illinois). For the group comparisons, an unpaired t test was performed on CBF, ATT, % CBF-sig voxels, % ATT-sig voxels, CBF-sig, and ATT-sig. An empirical relationship between CBF and ATT was sought for controls and patients by regression analysis. Curve fitting was performed in SPSS using both a linear model and an exponential model. Finally, a within-VB patients 1-way analysis of variance was performed on these data by separating patients based of the 3 VB ratings.

Results

We recruited 21 patients (14 men, mean age 66 years, SD 11 years) and 20 healthy controls to the study. There was no significant difference in age or sex between patients and controls (P < .87, P < .79, respectively). DWI scans showed no evidence for acute ischemia at the time of the MR imaging. Table 1 shows the clinical details of the patients, the CE-MRA vascular imaging findings, and the category of severity of VB-disease, as determined by the neurologic review.

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 1:

Patient demographics, including history of stroke or TIA, infarcts, and arterial disease

Figure 1 shows CBF and ATT images for representative participants. The figure shows a 65-year-old control participant (Fig 1A), followed by patients sorted by their VB disease severity. Fig 1B shows a 73-year-old man with no VB disease (P16). CBF and ATT images in Fig 1A, -B appear normal. Fig 1C shows a 65-year-old male patient with moderate VB disease (P2). Fig 1D shows P1, with a left vertebral occlusion and severe right vertebral stenosis. Fig 1C, -D demonstrate regions with reduced CBF, prolonged ATT, or both.

Comparison between Patients and Controls

The percentage of voxels that showed a significant fit was different between groups for CBF in the parietal region of interest (92 ± 9.5% for controls versus 81 ± 19.3% for patients, P = .021) and occipital region of interest (97 ± 4.3% for controls versus 85 ± 19.9% for patients, P = .024). Similarly, for ATT, the percentage of significant voxel fits was higher in controls in the parietal region of interest (98 ± 4.8% for controls versus 91 ± 12.9% for patients, P = .033) and occipital region of interest (99 ± 1.8% for controls versus 92 ± 13.2% for patients, P = .024). Table 2 shows CBF was reduced in patients compared with controls in the occipital region of interest (P = .10) and parietal ROIs (P = .003). After excluding voxels that showed a poor CBF fit, the occipital region of interest remained significant (P = .003), while the parietal ROI was not (P = .161). Neither region of interest showed a significant ATT difference between groups (P > .09).

View this table:
  • View inline
  • View popup
Table 2:

CBF and ATT for patients with VB disease and controls separated by group and ROI

Fig 2 shows CBF versus ATT for controls (Fig 2A) and patients (Fig 2B). The CBF versus ATT curve fitting was not significant for controls (P = .06). For patients, however, both linear and exponential curves were significant (P < .001), with the exponential curves explaining a greater proportion of the variance (r2 = 0.25 and r2 = 0.31, respectively).

Fig 2.
  • Download figure
  • Open in new tab
  • Download powerpoint
Fig 2.

Empirical characterization of CBF and ATT for controls (top) and patients with VB disease (bottom). Lower CBF values were associated with longer ATT. The ATT range was greater among patients. Linear and exponential curves are shown. Curve fitting was significant for patients (P < .001) but not controls.

Within-VB Patient Analysis

Table 2 shows the results of the 1-way ANOVA and revealed a significant relationship between occipital ATT and VB disease rating (P = .026), which was significant when considering only ATT-sig voxels (P = .010). To address the small sample size for the severe and moderate VB subgroups, a test of homogeneity of the variance was performed and found not to be significantly different between subgroups (P > .235).

Discussion

This study demonstrates that multiple inflow ASL can be used to characterize hemodynamics among patients with symptomatic VB large artery stenotic disease. These results extend the work of previous clinical ASL studies 2,5⇓–7,19⇓–21 by showing that CBF is reduced in the VB circulation in patients compared with controls. Significance of ASL fitting was assessed voxelwise using the 95% confidence intervals produced from the ASL model fitting. The percentage of the CBF-sig and ATT-sig voxels was lower among patients compared with controls, which suggests that a wider inflow time schedule among patients may have been useful. Further, it was possible to evaluate the impact of including voxels that showed a poor fit, which is a new approach in ASL. Excluding voxels within the region of interest that showed a poor fit did not substantially alter the results. We observed an empirical relationship between CBF and ATT that was significant among VB patients. Finally, occipital ATT was strongly related to VB disease severity rating.

Our focus was on patients with VB large artery stenotic disease, which is an area of research that is underreported in the perfusion literature compared with carotid disease.8,19,22 In addition, to our knowledge, this is the first study that has attempted to assess fitting results from the ASL model in a clinical population. Analyses could be extended to incorporate the number of ASL difference pairs that are required to produce reliable estimates23 or by using a bootstrap approach on the residuals to assess the reliability of the ASL estimates.24

Within-VB analysis showed ATT was significantly correlated with VB disease severity, which suggests ATT may be a good marker of hemodynamic alteration downstream of atherosclerotic stenoses. Future work could compare ATT with more established techniques like digital subtraction angiography. ATT was not significantly different between patients and controls because the patient group showed a large ATT variance. Although ATT is quantitative, it is dependent on the imaging volume and labeling schemes, so it can be difficult to compare between studies. Our ATT values among controls were consistent with our previous work that used pulsed ASL 3D GRASE. Furthermore, the maximum measurable ATT is determined by the longest inflow value. On the basis of the percent ATT-sig voxels, it was possible to estimate ATT voxelwise in greater than 80% of the voxels. A post hoc analysis revealed that the percentage of voxels that met the lower-bound ATT threshold (ie, greater than zero) was correlated with the percentage of voxels from the upper-bound ATT threshold. Ultimately, this illustrates that participants with a poor upper-bound ATT fit also showed a poor lower-bound fit, suggesting our metric for ATT significant voxel fitting was reasonable.

Recent work highlights the value of ATT,21,25 while others have used the arterial transit artifact from single-inflow pseudocontinuous ASL to quantify collateral flow.4 Another ATT acquisition approach is to perform multiple inflow ASL with a lower spatial resolution acquisition that requires fewer averages to estimate ATT.26 We characterized the relationship between CBF and ATT and found a significant trend among patients. The data showed that ATT increased faster than CBF decreased among patients, as suggested by an exponential curve. Future work is warranted to establish how ATT is influenced by intra- and extracranial vascular disease.

The current study is not without limitations. First, analysis was restricted to the cortical regions, despite knowledge that the VB circulation includes the brain stem and cerebellum,27 as the ASL acquisition did not adequately cover lower brain regions. Second, our ASL implementation did not incorporate flow-crushing gradients and we did not model large-artery contributions to the ASL signal.28 Recent work by our group has shown, however, that large vessel signals using pulsed ASL 3D GRASE tend to occur mainly near the middle cerebral arteries.29 Consequently, we do not expect this to be a major issue in the current study. Third, absolute CBF values were comparable with other perfusion studies involving older or patient populations,21,30⇓–32 but were still generally lower than might be expected. We attribute this to through-plane partial volume blurring associated with the current ASL implementation, which accentuates partial volume effects with white-matter voxels. The quantification method was consistent for all participants, thus within- and between-groups results are valid.

Conclusions

We have demonstrated that cortical perfusion and hemodynamics are altered in patients with underlying VB large artery disease. The multiple inflow ASL allowed for estimation of CBF and ATT, as well as the proportion of significant voxels within the ROIs. ASL perfusion imaging is a noninvasive method that can be used to determine the hemodynamic relevance and perfusion patterns in patients with cerebrovascular stenotic disease, which ultimately may be useful when deciding upon treatment options.

Acknowledgments

We thank Dr. Nicola Filippini for contributing to data collection.

Footnotes

  • B.J.M. and L.M. contributed equally to this work.

  • This work was funded by the UK Medical Research Council, Dunhill Medical Trust (P.J.); the Stroke Association, National Institute for Health Research, NIHR Clinician Scientist Fellowship (U.G.S.); and the NIHR Oxford Partnership Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre and Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (B.J.M.).

  • Disclosures: Bradley MacIntosh—RELATED: Grant: Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, Comments: Postdoctoral fellowship award; UNRELATED: Grants/Grants Pending: NIHR Oxford Partnership Comprehensive Biomedical Research Centre. Ursula Schulz—RELATED: Grant: National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), Comments: Dr. U.G. Schulz is funded by an NIHR-Clinician Scientist Fellowship. Peter Jezzard—RELATED: Grant: MRC,* Dunhill Medical Trust,* Stroke Association,* NIHR,* Stroke Foundation of Canada,* Comments: All gave grant funding; Support for Travel to Meetings for the Study or Other Purposes: MRC,* Dunhill Medical Trust,* Comments: Travel funds for students and postdocs. (* Money paid to institution)

Indicates open access to non-subscribers at www.ajnr.org

References

  1. 1.↵
    1. Alsop DC,
    2. Detre JA.
    . Reduced transit-time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:1236–49
    CrossRefPubMed
  2. 2.↵
    1. Chalela JA,
    2. Alsop DC,
    3. Gonzalez-Atavales JB,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance perfusion imaging in acute ischemic stroke using continuous arterial spin labeling. Stroke 2000;31:680–87
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  3. 3.↵
    1. Williams DS,
    2. Detre JA,
    3. Leigh JS,
    4. et al
    . Magnetic resonance imaging of perfusion using spin inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1992;89:212–16
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  4. 4.↵
    1. Zaharchuk G,
    2. Do HM,
    3. Marks MP,
    4. et al
    . Arterial spin-labeling MRI can identify the presence and intensity of collateral perfusion in patients with Moyamoya disease. Stroke 2011;42:2485–91
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  5. 5.↵
    1. Bokkers RP,
    2. van Laar PJ,
    3. van de Ven KC,
    4. et al
    . Arterial spin-labeling MR imaging measurements of timing parameters in patients with a carotid artery occlusion. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1698–703
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  6. 6.↵
    1. Bokkers RP,
    2. Bremmer JP,
    3. van Berckel BN,
    4. et al
    . Arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI at multiple delay times: a correlative study with H215O positron emission tomography in patients with symptomatic carotid artery occlusion. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2010;30:222–29
    CrossRefPubMed
  7. 7.↵
    1. MacIntosh BJ,
    2. Lindsay AC,
    3. Kylintireas I,
    4. et al
    . Multiple inflow pulsed arterial spin-labeling reveals delays in the arterial arrival time in minor stroke and transient ischemic attack. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1892–94
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  8. 8.↵
    1. Kansagra AP,
    2. Wong EC.
    . Mapping of vertebral artery perfusion territories using arterial spin labeling MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;28:762–66
    CrossRefPubMed
  9. 9.↵
    1. Hendrikse J,
    2. van der Grond J,
    3. Lu H,
    4. et al
    . Flow territory mapping of the cerebral arteries with regional perfusion MRI. Stroke 2004;35:882–87
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  10. 10.↵
    1. Chimowitz MI.
    . Prognosis of patients with symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis The Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease (WASID) study group. Stroke 1998;29:1389–92
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  11. 11.↵
    1. Flossmann E,
    2. Rothwell PM.
    . Prognosis of vertebrobasilar transient ischaemic attack and minor stroke. Brain 2003;126:1940–54
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  12. 12.↵
    1. Marquardt L,
    2. Kuker W,
    3. Chandratheva A,
    4. et al
    . Incidence and prognosis of > or = 50% symptomatic vertebral or basilar artery stenosis: prospective population-based study. Brain 2009;132:982–88
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  13. 13.↵
    1. MacIntosh BJ,
    2. Filippini N,
    3. Chappell MA,
    4. et al
    . Assessment of arterial arrival times derived from multiple inversion time pulsed arterial spin labeling MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:641–47
    CrossRefPubMed
  14. 14.↵
    1. Günther M,
    2. Oshio K,
    3. Feinberg DA.
    . Single-shot 3D imaging techniques improve arterial spin labeling perfusion measurements. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:491–98
    CrossRefPubMed
  15. 15.↵
    1. Mumford JA,
    2. Hernandez-Garcia L,
    3. Lee GR,
    4. et al
    . Estimation efficiency and statistical power in arterial spin labeling fMRI. Neuroimage 2006;33:103–14
    CrossRefPubMed
  16. 16.↵
    1. Buxton RB,
    2. Frank LR,
    3. Wong EC,
    4. et al
    . A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:383–96
    CrossRefPubMed
  17. 17.↵
    1. MacIntosh BJ,
    2. Pattinson KT,
    3. Gallichan D,
    4. et al
    . Measuring the effects of remifentanil on cerebral blood flow and arterial arrival time using 3D GRASE MRI with pulsed arterial spin labelling. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2008;28:1514–22
    CrossRefPubMed
  18. 18.↵
    1. Ye FQ,
    2. Frank JA,
    3. Weinberger DR,
    4. et al
    . Noise reduction in 3D perfusion imaging by attenuating the static signal in arterial spin tagging (ASSIST). Magn Reson Med 2000;44:92–100
    CrossRefPubMed
  19. 19.↵
    1. Hendrikse J,
    2. van Osch MJ,
    3. Rutgers DR,
    4. et al
    . Internal carotid artery occlusion assessed at pulsed arterial spin-labeling perfusion MR imaging at multiple delay times. Radiology 2004;233:899–904
    CrossRefPubMed
  20. 20.↵
    1. Kim HS,
    2. Kim SY,
    3. Kim JM.
    . Underestimation of cerebral perfusion on flow-sensitive alternating inversion recovery image: semiquantitative evaluation with time-to-peak values. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:2008–13
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  21. 21.↵
    1. Yoshiura T,
    2. Hiwatashi A,
    3. Yamashita K,
    4. et al
    . Simultaneous measurement of arterial transit time, arterial blood volume, and cerebral blood flow using arterial spin-labeling in patients with Alzheimer disease. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1388–93
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  22. 22.↵
    1. Moftakhar R,
    2. Turk AS,
    3. Niemann DB,
    4. et al
    . Effects of carotid or vertebrobasilar stent placement on cerebral perfusion and cognition. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1772–80
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  23. 23.↵
    1. Fernández-Seara MA,
    2. Edlow BL,
    3. Hoang A,
    4. et al
    . Minimizing acquisition time of arterial spin labeling at 3T. Magn Reson Med 2008;59:1467–71
    CrossRefPubMed
  24. 24.↵
    1. Jones DK,
    2. Pierpaoli C.
    . Confidence mapping in diffusion tensor magnetic resonance imaging tractography using a bootstrap approach. Magn Reson Med 2005;53:1143–49
    CrossRefPubMed
  25. 25.↵
    1. Bokkers RP,
    2. van der Worp HB,
    3. Mali WP,
    4. et al
    . Noninvasive MR imaging of cerebral perfusion in patients with a carotid artery stenosis. Neurology 2009;73:869–75
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  26. 26.↵
    1. Wu WC,
    2. St Lawrence KS,
    3. Licht DJ,
    4. et al
    . Quantification issues in arterial spin labeling perfusion magnetic resonance imaging. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2010;21:65–73
    CrossRefPubMed
  27. 27.↵
    1. Tatu L,
    2. Moulin T,
    3. Bogousslavsky J,
    4. et al
    . Arterial territories of the human brain: cerebral hemispheres. Neurology 1998;50:1699–708
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  28. 28.↵
    1. Ye FQ,
    2. Mattay VS,
    3. Jezzard P,
    4. et al
    . Correction for vascular artifacts in cerebral blood flow values measured by using arterial spin tagging techniques. Magn Reson Med 1997;37:226–35
    PubMed
  29. 29.↵
    1. Chappell MA,
    2. MacIntosh BJ,
    3. Donahue MJ,
    4. et al
    . Separation of macrovascular signal in multi-inversion time arterial spin labelling MRI. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:1357–65
    CrossRefPubMed
  30. 30.↵
    1. Hosoda K,
    2. Kawaguchi T,
    3. Shibata Y,
    4. et al
    . Cerebral vasoreactivity and internal carotid artery flow help to identify patients at risk for hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy. Stroke 2001;32:1567–73
    Abstract/FREE Full Text
  31. 31.↵
    1. Ogasawara K,
    2. Yukawa H,
    3. Kobayashi M,
    4. et al
    . Prediction and monitoring of cerebral hyperperfusion after carotid endarterectomy by using single-photon emission computerized tomography scanning. J Neurosurg 2003;99:504–10
    PubMed
  32. 32.↵
    1. Zaharchuk G,
    2. Straka M,
    3. Marks MP,
    4. et al
    . Combined arterial spin label and dynamic susceptibility contrast measurement of cerebral blood flow. Magn Reson Med 2010;63:1548–56
    CrossRefPubMed
  • Received November 16, 2011.
  • Accepted after revision January 30, 2012.
  • © 2012 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
View Abstract
PreviousNext
Back to top

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 33 (10)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 33, Issue 10
1 Nov 2012
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
Advertisement
Print
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Hemodynamic Alterations in Vertebrobasilar Large Artery Disease Assessed by Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
B.J. MacIntosh, L. Marquardt, U.G. Schulz, P. Jezzard, P.M. Rothwell
Hemodynamic Alterations in Vertebrobasilar Large Artery Disease Assessed by Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2012, 33 (10) 1939-1944; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3090

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Hemodynamic Alterations in Vertebrobasilar Large Artery Disease Assessed by Arterial Spin-Labeling MR Imaging
B.J. MacIntosh, L. Marquardt, U.G. Schulz, P. Jezzard, P.M. Rothwell
American Journal of Neuroradiology Nov 2012, 33 (10) 1939-1944; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A3090
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
    • Abstract
    • ABBREVIATIONS:
    • Materials and Methods
    • Discussion
    • Conclusions
    • Acknowledgments
    • Footnotes
    • References
  • Figures & Data
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • References
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • Temporal and Spatial Variances in Arterial Spin-Labeling Are Inversely Related to Large-Artery Blood Velocity
  • White Matter Hyperintensity Volume and Cerebral Perfusion in Older Individuals with Hypertension Using Arterial Spin-Labeling
  • Regional Cerebral Arterial Transit Time Hemodynamics Correlate with Vascular Risk Factors and Cognitive Function in Men with Coronary Artery Disease
  • Crossref (22)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • Recommended implementation of arterial spin‐labeled perfusion MRI for clinical applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European consortium for ASL in dementia
    David C. Alsop, John A. Detre, Xavier Golay, Matthias Günther, Jeroen Hendrikse, Luis Hernandez‐Garcia, Hanzhang Lu, Bradley J. MacIntosh, Laura M. Parkes, Marion Smits, Matthias J. P. van Osch, Danny J. J. Wang, Eric C. Wong, Greg Zaharchuk
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2015 73 1
  • A neuroradiologist’s guide to arterial spin labeling MRI in clinical practice
    M. Grade, J. A. Hernandez Tamames, F. B. Pizzini, E. Achten, X. Golay, M. Smits
    Neuroradiology 2015 57 12
  • Neural Mechanisms of Brain Plasticity with Complex Cognitive Training in Healthy Seniors
    S. B. Chapman, S. Aslan, J. S. Spence, J. J. Hart, E. K. Bartz, N. Didehbani, M. W. Keebler, C. M. Gardner, J. F. Strain, L. F. DeFina, H. Lu
    Cerebral Cortex 2015 25 2
  • Cerebral Blood Flow Quantification Using Vessel-Encoded Arterial Spin Labeling
    Thomas W Okell, Michael A Chappell, Michael E Kelly, Peter Jezzard
    Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow & Metabolism 2013 33 11
  • White Matter Hyperintensity Volume and Cerebral Perfusion in Older Individuals with Hypertension Using Arterial Spin-Labeling
    J.W. van Dalen, H.J.M.M. Mutsaerts, A.J. Nederveen, H. Vrenken, M.D. Steenwijk, M.W.A. Caan, C.B.L.M. Majoie, W.A. van Gool, E. Richard
    American Journal of Neuroradiology 2016 37 10
  • A general framework for optimizing arterial spin labeling MRI experiments
    Joseph G. Woods, Michael A. Chappell, Thomas W. Okell
    Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2019 81 4
  • Automated removal of spurious intermediate cerebral blood flow volumes improves image quality among older patients: A clinical arterial spin labeling investigation
    Zahra Shirzadi, David E. Crane, Andrew D. Robertson, Pejman J. Maralani, Richard I. Aviv, Michael A. Chappell, Benjamin I. Goldstein, Sandra E. Black, Bradley J. MacIntosh
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2015 42 5
  • Comparing accuracy and reproducibility of sequential and Hadamard‐encoded multidelay pseudocontinuous arterial spin labeling for measuring cerebral blood flow and arterial transit time in healthy subjects: A simulation and in vivo study
    Jia Guo, Samantha J. Holdsworth, Audrey P. Fan, Marc R. Lebel, Zungho Zun, Ajit Shankaranarayanan, Greg Zaharchuk
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2018 47 4
  • Enhancement of automated blood flow estimates (ENABLE) from arterial spin‐labeled MRI
    Zahra Shirzadi, Bojana Stefanovic, Michael A. Chappell, Joel Ramirez, Graeme Schwindt, Mario Masellis, Sandra E. Black, Bradley J. MacIntosh
    Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2018 47 3
  • Rapid 3D dynamic arterial spin labeling with a sparse model-based image reconstruction
    Li Zhao, Samuel W. Fielden, Xue Feng, Max Wintermark, John P. Mugler, Craig H. Meyer
    NeuroImage 2015 121

More in this TOC Section

  • White Matter Alterations in the Brains of Patients with Active, Remitted, and Cured Cushing Syndrome: A DTI Study
  • Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis of MR Imaging Findings in Patients with Middle Cerebral Artery Stroke Implanted with Mesenchymal Stem Cells
  • Fast Contrast-Enhanced 4D MRA and 4D Flow MRI Using Constrained Reconstruction (HYPRFlow): Potential Applications for Brain Arteriovenous Malformations
Show more Brain

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire