Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Research ArticleORIGINAL RESEARCH

Prevalence of Rathke’s Cleft and Other Incidental Pituitary Gland Findings on Contrast-Enhanced 3D Fat-Saturated T1-MPRAGE at 7 Tesla MRI

Mikael Mir, Nathaniel P. Miller, Matthew White, Wendy Elvendahl, Ayca Ersen Danyeli and Can Özütemiz
American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2024, ajnr.A8393; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A8393
Mikael Mir
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States 2 Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Acıbadem University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey; University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Radiology, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Nathaniel P. Miller
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States 2 Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Acıbadem University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey; University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Radiology, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Matthew White
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States 2 Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Acıbadem University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey; University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Radiology, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Wendy Elvendahl
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States 2 Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Acıbadem University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey; University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Radiology, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Ayca Ersen Danyeli
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States 2 Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Acıbadem University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey; University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Radiology, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
Can Özütemiz
University of Minnesota Medical School, Minneapolis, MN, United States 2 Center for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, United States; Acıbadem University, School of Medicine, Department of Pathology, Istanbul, Turkey; University of Minnesota Medical School, Department of Radiology, Minneapolis, MN, United States
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF
Loading

This article requires a subscription to view the full text. If you have a subscription you may use the login form below to view the article. Access to this article can also be purchased.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A cleft-like non-enhancing hypointensity was observed repeatedly in the pituitary gland at the adenohypophysis/neurohypophysis border on contrast-enhanced 3D-Fat-Saturated T1-MPRAGE (C+3D-FS-T1 MPRAGE) using clinical 7T MRI. Our primary goal is to assess the prevalence of this finding. The secondary goals are to evaluate the frequency of other incidental pituitary lesions, MRI artifacts, and their effect on pituitary imaging on the C+3D-FS-T1 MPRAGE at 7T.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: 100 patients who underwent 7T neuroimaging between 10/27/2021 and 8/10/23 were included. Each case was evaluated for cleft-like pituitary hypointensity, pituitary masses, and artifacts on C+3D-FS-T1 MPRAGE. Follow-up exams were evaluated if present. The average prevalence for each finding was calculated, as were descriptive statistics for age and sex.

RESULTS: A cleft-like hypointensity was present in 66% of 7T MRIs. There were no significant differences between the "cleft-like present" and "cleft-like absent" groups regarding sex (P = .39) and age (P = .32). The cleft-like hypointensity was demonstrated in follow-up MRIs in 3/3 patients with 7T, 1/12 with 3T, and 1/5 with 1.5T. A mass was found in 22%, while 75% had no mass, and 3% were indeterminate. A mass was found in 18 (27%) of the "cleft-like present" and 4 (13%) of the "cleft-like absent" groups. The most common mass types were Rathke cleft cyst (RCC) in 7 (31.8%) patients, "RCC vs. entrapped CSF" in 6 (27.3%), and microadenoma in 6 (22.2%) in the "cleft-like present" group. There were no significant differences in the mass types between the "cleft-like present" and "cleft-like absent" groups (P = .23). Susceptibility and/or motion artifacts were frequent in general using C+3D-FS-T1 MPRAGE (54%). Artifact-free scans were significantly more frequent in the "cleft-like present" group (P =.03).

CONCLUSIONS: A cleft-like non-enhancing hypointensity was frequently seen on the C+3D-FS-T1 MPRAGE at 7T MRI, which most likely represents a normal embryological Rathke's cleft remnant and cannot be seen in lower field strength MRIs. Susceptibility and motion artifacts are common in the sella. They may affect image quality, and the artifacts at 7T may lead to an underestimation of the prevalence of Rathke cleft and other incidental findings.

ABBREVIATIONS: C+3D-FS-T 1MPRAGE = Contrast-Enhanced 3D-Fat-Saturated T1-Magnetization Prepared Rapid Gradient Echo Imaging; RCC = Rathke's Cleft Cyst.

Footnotes

  • The authors declare no conflicts of interest related to the content of this article.

  • © 2024 by American Journal of Neuroradiology

Log in using your username and password

Forgot your user name or password?

Log in through your institution

You may be able to gain access using your login credentials for your institution. Contact your library if you do not have a username and password.
PreviousNext
Back to top
Advertisement
Download PDF
Email Article

Thank you for your interest in spreading the word on American Journal of Neuroradiology.

NOTE: We only request your email address so that the person you are recommending the page to knows that you wanted them to see it, and that it is not junk mail. We do not capture any email address.

Enter multiple addresses on separate lines or separate them with commas.
Prevalence of Rathke’s Cleft and Other Incidental Pituitary Gland Findings on Contrast-Enhanced 3D Fat-Saturated T1-MPRAGE at 7 Tesla MRI
(Your Name) has sent you a message from American Journal of Neuroradiology
(Your Name) thought you would like to see the American Journal of Neuroradiology web site.
CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether or not you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
Cite this article
Accepted Manuscript
Mikael Mir, Nathaniel P. Miller, Matthew White, Wendy Elvendahl, Ayca Ersen Danyeli, Can Özütemiz
Prevalence of Rathke’s Cleft and Other Incidental Pituitary Gland Findings on Contrast-Enhanced 3D Fat-Saturated T1-MPRAGE at 7 Tesla MRI
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2024, ajnr.A8393; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8393

Citation Manager Formats

  • BibTeX
  • Bookends
  • EasyBib
  • EndNote (tagged)
  • EndNote 8 (xml)
  • Medlars
  • Mendeley
  • Papers
  • RefWorks Tagged
  • Ref Manager
  • RIS
  • Zotero
0 Responses
Respond to this article
Share
Bookmark this article
Accepted Manuscript
Prevalence of Rathke’s Cleft and Other Incidental Pituitary Gland Findings on Contrast-Enhanced 3D Fat-Saturated T1-MPRAGE at 7 Tesla MRI
Mikael Mir, Nathaniel P. Miller, Matthew White, Wendy Elvendahl, Ayca Ersen Danyeli, Can Özütemiz
American Journal of Neuroradiology Jun 2024, ajnr.A8393; DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.A8393
del.icio.us logo Twitter logo Facebook logo Mendeley logo
  • Tweet Widget
  • Facebook Like
  • Google Plus One
Purchase

Jump to section

  • Article
  • Info & Metrics
  • Responses
  • PDF

Related Articles

  • No related articles found.
  • PubMed
  • Google Scholar

Cited By...

  • No citing articles found.
  • Crossref (3)
  • Google Scholar

This article has been cited by the following articles in journals that are participating in Crossref Cited-by Linking.

  • How to Implement Clinical 7T MRI—Practical Considerations and Experience with Ultra-High-Field MRI
    Justin Cramer, Ichiro Ikuta, Yuxiang Zhou
    Bioengineering 2024 11 12
  • Postoperative management of diabetes insipidus in a pediatric patient with Rathke’s cleft cyst undergoing transsphenoidal endonasal surgery
    Eko Nofiyanto, Radian Ahmad Halimi, Iwan Fuadi
    Surgical Neurology International 2025 16
  • Radiopaedia.org
    Donna D'Souza, Arlene Campos, Henry Knipe
    2008

More in this TOC Section

  • Digital Subtraction Myelography for the Detection of Type 1 Spinal CSF Leaks: Evaluation of Temporal Characteristics and Diagnostic Value
  • Glymphatic Function as a Moderator in White Matter Injury and Cognitive Impairment: A Community-Dwelling Cohort Study
  • Adjunctive Flat-panel CT-based Reperfusion Grading after Endovascular Therapy: Enhanced Detection of Residual Distal Vessel Occlusion
Show more ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Similar Articles

Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire