Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

More articles from SPINE

  • Spine
    You have access
    Major Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Total Spine MRI Performed in the Emergency Department at a Major Academic Medical Center
    C.W.C. Huang, A. Ali, Y.-M. Chang, A.F. Bezuidenhout, D.B. Hackney, J.A. Edlow and R.A. Bhadelia
    American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2020, 41 (6) 1120-1125; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6578
  • Spine
    You have access
    MR Myelography for the Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas
    J.L. Chazen, M.S. Robbins, S.B. Strauss, A.D. Schweitzer and J.P. Greenfield
    American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2020, 41 (5) 938-940; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6521
  • EDITOR'S CHOICESpine
    Open Access
    Sensitivity of the Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer Imaging Technique to Spinal Cord Damage in Multiple Sclerosis
    H. Rasoanandrianina, S. Demortière, A. Trabelsi, J.P. Ranjeva, O. Girard, G. Duhamel, M. Guye, J. Pelletier, B. Audoin and V. Callot
    American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2020, 41 (5) 929-937; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6554

    Anatomic images covering the cervical spinal cord from the C1 to C6 levels and DTI, magnetization transfer/inhomogeneous magnetization transfer images at the C2/C5 levels were acquired in 19 patients with MS and 19 paired healthy controls. Anatomic images were segmented in spinal cord GM and WM, both manually and using the AMU40 atlases. MS lesions were manually delineated. MR imaging metrics were analyzed within normal-appearing and lesion regions in anterolateral and posterolateral WM and compared using Wilcoxon rank tests and z scores. The use of a multiparametric MR imaging protocol combined with an automatic template-based GM/WM segmentation approach in the current study outlined a higher sensitivity of the ihMT technique toward spinal cord pathophysiologic changes in MS compared with atrophy measurements, DTI, and conventional MT. The authors also conclude that the clinical correlations between ihMTR and functional impairment observed in patients with MS also argue for its potential clinical relevance, paving the way for future longitudinal multicentric clinical trials in MS.

  • Spine
    You have access
    Lumbar Puncture: Creation and Resident Acceptance of a Low-Cost, Durable, Reusable Fluoroscopic Phantom with a Fluid-Filled Spinal Canal for Training at an Academic Program
    D.J. Lerner, S.E. Gifford, N. Olafsen, A. Mileto and E. Soloff
    American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2020, 41 (3) 548-550; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6439
  • EDITOR'S CHOICESpine
    You have access
    Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: The Dilemma of Delayed Diagnosis
    F. Jablawi, G.A. Schubert, M. Dafotakis, J. Pons-Kühnemann, F.-J. Hans and M. Mull
    American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 357-363; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6372

    Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (sdAVFs) usually become symptomatic in elderly men, who are affected 5 times more often than women. Symptoms caused by sdAVF comprise gait disturbances with or without paresis, sensory disturbances in the lower extremities, pain, and sphincter and erectile dysfunction. The authors retrospectively analyzed their medical data base for all patients treated for spinal dural arteriovenous fistula at their institution between 2006 and 2016. Patient age, neurologic status at the time of diagnosis, the duration of symptoms from onset to diagnosis, and follow-up information were evaluated. The extent of medullary T2WI hyperintensity, intramedullary contrast enhancement, and elongation of perimedullary veins on MR imaging at the time of diagnosis were additionally analyzed. Data for long-term outcome analysis were available in 40 patients with a mean follow-up of 52 months. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 69 years (median, 71 years; range, 53-84 years) with a male predominance (80%). The mean duration of symptoms was 20 months. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas are characterized by inter-individually variable clinical presentations, which make a determination of specific predictors for long-term outcome more difficult. Fast and sufficient diagnosis might result in a better outcome after treatment. The diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula remains markedly delayed, reflecting an ongoing lack of knowledge and awareness among treating physicians of this rare-but-serious disease.

  • Spine
    You have access
    Differentiation between Tuberculous and Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: The Role of the Anterior Meningovertebral Ligament in Patients with Anterior Epidural Abscess
    S.B. Strauss, S.R. Gordon, J. Burns, J.A. Bello and S.E. Slasky
    American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 364-368; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6370
  • Spine
    Open Access
    Considerations for Mean Upper Cervical Cord Area Implementation in a Longitudinal MRI Setting: Methods, Interrater Reliability, and MRI Quality Control
    C. Chien, V. Juenger, M. Scheel, A.U. Brandt and F. Paul
    American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 343-350; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6394
  • FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBSpine
    You have access
    Renal Excretion of Contrast on CT Myelography: A Specific Marker of CSF Leak
    S. Behbahani, J. Raseman, H. Orlowski, A. Sharma and R. Eldaya
    American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 351-356; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6393

    The authors performed a retrospective review of postmyelographic CT scans from 49 consecutive patients seen between January 2009 and August 2018 with imaging and/or clinical findings related to intracranial hypotension. Each scan was evaluated by both a neuroradiology fellow and a board-certified neuroradiologist for the presence of contrast in the renal excretory system. A similar assessment was also performed on 90 consecutive control subjects who underwent CT myelography for alternative indications. Among the 49 patients with suspected CSF leak, 21 (43%) had an overt CSF leak on postmyelographic CT (group 1) and 28 (57%) did not (group 2). Overall, renal contrast was identified in 7/49 patients (14.3%): 5 (24%) patients in group 1, and 2 (7%) patients in group 2. Renal contrast was not seen in any of the 90 controls on postmyelographic CT. Renal contrast was exclusively seen in patients with a clinically or radiographically suspected CSF leak. Identification of this finding should prompt a second look for subtle myelographic contrast extravasation or an underlying CSF-venous fistula.

  • Spine
    Open Access
    Lateral Decubitus Digital Subtraction Myelography: Tips, Tricks, and Pitfalls
    D.K. Kim, W. Brinjikji, P.P. Morris, F.E. Diehn, V.T. Lehman, G.B. Liebo, J.M. Morris, J.T. Verdoorn, J.K. Cutsforth-Gregory, R.I. Farb, J.C Benson and C.M. Carr
    American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 21-28; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6368
  • EDITOR'S CHOICESpine
    You have access
    Number Needed to Treat with Vertebral Augmentation to Save a Life
    J.A. Hirsch, R.V. Chandra, N.S. Carter, D. Beall, M. Frohbergh and K. Ong
    American Journal of Neuroradiology January 2020, 41 (1) 178-182; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6367

    The purpose of this study was to calculate the number needed to treat to save 1 life at 1 year and up to 5 years after vertebral augmentation. A 10-year sample of the 100% US Medicare data base was used to identify patients with vertebral compression fractures treated with nonsurgical management, balloon kyphoplasty, and vertebroplasty. The number needed to treat was calculated between augmentation and nonsurgical management groups from years 1–5 following a vertebral compression fracture diagnosis, using survival probabilities for each management approach. The adjusted number needed to treat to save 1 life for nonsurgical management versus kyphoplasty ranged from 14.8 at year 1 to 11.9 at year 5. The adjusted number needed to treat for nonsurgical management versus vertebroplasty ranged from 22.8 at year 1 to 23.8 at year 5. The authors conclude that the NNT analysis of more than 2 million patients with VCF reveals that only 15 patients need to be treated to save 1 life at 1 year. This has an obvious clinically significant impact and given that all augmentation clinical trials are underpowered to detect a mortality benefit, this large dataset analysis reveals that vertebral augmentation provides a significant mortality benefit over nonsurgical management with a low NNT.

Pages

  • Previous
  • Next
  • 1
  • …
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • …
  • 37
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire