Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

More articles from SPINE IMAGING AND SPINE IMAGE-GUIDED INTERVENTIONS

  • FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    You have access
    Spine MRI in Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension for CSF Leak Detection: Nonsuperiority of Intrathecal Gadolinium to Heavily T2-Weighted Fat-Saturated Sequences
    T. Dobrocky, A. Winklehner, P.S. Breiding, L. Grunder, G. Peschi, L. Häni, P.J. Mosimann, M. Branca, J. Kaesmacher, P. Mordasini, A. Raabe, C.T. Ulrich, J. Beck, J. Gralla and E.I. Piechowiak
    American Journal of Neuroradiology July 2020, 41 (7) 1309-1315; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6592

    The authors performed a retrospective study of patients with spontaneous intracranial hypotension examined from February 2013 to October 2017. The spine MR imaging was reviewed by 3 blinded readers for the presence of epidural CSF using 3 different sequences (T2WI, 3D T2WI fat-saturated, T1WI gadolinium). In patients with leaks, the presumed level of the leak was reported. They conclude that intrathecal gadolinium-enhanced spine MR imaging does not improve the diagnostic accuracy for the detection of epidural CSF. Gadolinium myelography lacks a rationale to be included in the routine spontaneous intracranial hypotension work-up. Heavily T2-weighted images with fat saturation provide high accuracy for the detection of an epidural CSF collection.

  • FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    Open Access
    High Prevalence of Spinal Cord Cavernous Malformations in the Familial Cerebral Cavernous Malformations Type 1 Cohort
    M.C. Mabray, J. Starcevich, J. Hallstrom, M. Robinson, M. Bartlett, J. Nelson, A. Zafar, H. Kim, L. Morrison and B.L. Hart
    American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2020, 41 (6) 1126-1130; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6584

    With prospective imaging to screen the spinal cord, the authors found SCCMs in 21 of 29 familial CCM1 patients, a prevalence of 72.4%. They conclude that the study demonstrates that SCCMs are indeed a common finding in patients with familial CCM and supports the idea of familial CCM syndrome as a progressive systemic disease that affects the entire central nervous system. They found an expected positive correlation of number of SCCMs with both patient age and number of intracranial CCMs. They also found a high prevalence of vertebral intraosseous vascular malformations (69%), including atypical (T1 hypointense) intraosseous vascular malformation in approximately 38% of the patients who underwent MR imaging screening.

  • Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    Open Access
    Improved Cervical Cord Lesion Detection with 3D-MP2RAGE Sequence in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
    S. Demortière, P. Lehmann, J. Pelletier, B. Audoin and V. Callot
    American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2020, 41 (6) 1131-1134; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6567
  • FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    You have access
    Counterpoint: Conventional Fluoroscopy-Guided Selective Cervical Nerve Root Block—A Safe, Effective, and Efficient Modality in the Hands of an Experienced Proceduralist
    F.W. Ott, R. Pluhm, K. Ozturk, A.M. McKinney and J.B. Rykken
    American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2020, 41 (6) 1112-1119; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6580

    Two-hundred fifty-four conventional fluoroscopy-guided selective cervical nerve root blocks were performed via an anterolateral approach with an average fluoroscopy time of 24.3 seconds for all cases. There were no aborted procedures and no major or permanent complications. There were 14 minor complications; 12 of these were periprocedural and resolved by the 2-week follow-up visit. One-hundred eighty-five patients (75.2%) reported pain improvement of >50% from baseline at 15 minutes postinjection. The authors conclude that this study confirms that conventional fluoroscopy is as safe and effective as CT for the guidance of selective cervical nerve root block when using a meticulous technique and a nonparticulate steroid and performed by an experienced proceduralist.

  • Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    You have access
    Major Radiologic and Clinical Outcomes of Total Spine MRI Performed in the Emergency Department at a Major Academic Medical Center
    C.W.C. Huang, A. Ali, Y.-M. Chang, A.F. Bezuidenhout, D.B. Hackney, J.A. Edlow and R.A. Bhadelia
    American Journal of Neuroradiology June 2020, 41 (6) 1120-1125; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6578
  • EDITOR'S CHOICESpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    Open Access
    Sensitivity of the Inhomogeneous Magnetization Transfer Imaging Technique to Spinal Cord Damage in Multiple Sclerosis
    H. Rasoanandrianina, S. Demortière, A. Trabelsi, J.P. Ranjeva, O. Girard, G. Duhamel, M. Guye, J. Pelletier, B. Audoin and V. Callot
    American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2020, 41 (5) 929-937; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6554

    Anatomic images covering the cervical spinal cord from the C1 to C6 levels and DTI, magnetization transfer/inhomogeneous magnetization transfer images at the C2/C5 levels were acquired in 19 patients with MS and 19 paired healthy controls. Anatomic images were segmented in spinal cord GM and WM, both manually and using the AMU40 atlases. MS lesions were manually delineated. MR imaging metrics were analyzed within normal-appearing and lesion regions in anterolateral and posterolateral WM and compared using Wilcoxon rank tests and z scores. The use of a multiparametric MR imaging protocol combined with an automatic template-based GM/WM segmentation approach in the current study outlined a higher sensitivity of the ihMT technique toward spinal cord pathophysiologic changes in MS compared with atrophy measurements, DTI, and conventional MT. The authors also conclude that the clinical correlations between ihMTR and functional impairment observed in patients with MS also argue for its potential clinical relevance, paving the way for future longitudinal multicentric clinical trials in MS.

  • Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    You have access
    MR Myelography for the Detection of CSF-Venous Fistulas
    J.L. Chazen, M.S. Robbins, S.B. Strauss, A.D. Schweitzer and J.P. Greenfield
    American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2020, 41 (5) 938-940; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6521
  • Spine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    You have access
    Lumbar Puncture: Creation and Resident Acceptance of a Low-Cost, Durable, Reusable Fluoroscopic Phantom with a Fluid-Filled Spinal Canal for Training at an Academic Program
    D.J. Lerner, S.E. Gifford, N. Olafsen, A. Mileto and E. Soloff
    American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2020, 41 (3) 548-550; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6439
  • FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBSpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    You have access
    Renal Excretion of Contrast on CT Myelography: A Specific Marker of CSF Leak
    S. Behbahani, J. Raseman, H. Orlowski, A. Sharma and R. Eldaya
    American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 351-356; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6393

    The authors performed a retrospective review of postmyelographic CT scans from 49 consecutive patients seen between January 2009 and August 2018 with imaging and/or clinical findings related to intracranial hypotension. Each scan was evaluated by both a neuroradiology fellow and a board-certified neuroradiologist for the presence of contrast in the renal excretory system. A similar assessment was also performed on 90 consecutive control subjects who underwent CT myelography for alternative indications. Among the 49 patients with suspected CSF leak, 21 (43%) had an overt CSF leak on postmyelographic CT (group 1) and 28 (57%) did not (group 2). Overall, renal contrast was identified in 7/49 patients (14.3%): 5 (24%) patients in group 1, and 2 (7%) patients in group 2. Renal contrast was not seen in any of the 90 controls on postmyelographic CT. Renal contrast was exclusively seen in patients with a clinically or radiographically suspected CSF leak. Identification of this finding should prompt a second look for subtle myelographic contrast extravasation or an underlying CSF-venous fistula.

  • EDITOR'S CHOICESpine Imaging and Spine Image-Guided Interventions
    You have access
    Long-Term Outcome of Patients with Spinal Dural Arteriovenous Fistula: The Dilemma of Delayed Diagnosis
    F. Jablawi, G.A. Schubert, M. Dafotakis, J. Pons-Kühnemann, F.-J. Hans and M. Mull
    American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2020, 41 (2) 357-363; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6372

    Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas (sdAVFs) usually become symptomatic in elderly men, who are affected 5 times more often than women. Symptoms caused by sdAVF comprise gait disturbances with or without paresis, sensory disturbances in the lower extremities, pain, and sphincter and erectile dysfunction. The authors retrospectively analyzed their medical data base for all patients treated for spinal dural arteriovenous fistula at their institution between 2006 and 2016. Patient age, neurologic status at the time of diagnosis, the duration of symptoms from onset to diagnosis, and follow-up information were evaluated. The extent of medullary T2WI hyperintensity, intramedullary contrast enhancement, and elongation of perimedullary veins on MR imaging at the time of diagnosis were additionally analyzed. Data for long-term outcome analysis were available in 40 patients with a mean follow-up of 52 months. The mean age at the time of diagnosis was 69 years (median, 71 years; range, 53-84 years) with a male predominance (80%). The mean duration of symptoms was 20 months. Spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas are characterized by inter-individually variable clinical presentations, which make a determination of specific predictors for long-term outcome more difficult. Fast and sufficient diagnosis might result in a better outcome after treatment. The diagnosis of spinal dural arteriovenous fistula remains markedly delayed, reflecting an ongoing lack of knowledge and awareness among treating physicians of this rare-but-serious disease.

Pages

  • Previous
  • Next
  • 1
  • …
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • …
  • 75
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire