Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Reply

Reply:

S.J. Huls, D.P. Shlapak, D.K. Kim, S. Leng and C.M. Carr
American Journal of Neuroradiology March 2023, 44 (3) E17; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A7803
S.J. Huls
aDepartment of RadiologyMayo Clinic, Ringgold Standard InstitutionRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S.J. Huls
D.P. Shlapak
aDepartment of RadiologyMayo Clinic, Ringgold Standard InstitutionRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.P. Shlapak
D.K. Kim
aDepartment of RadiologyMayo Clinic, Ringgold Standard InstitutionRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for D.K. Kim
S. Leng
aDepartment of RadiologyMayo Clinic, Ringgold Standard InstitutionRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for S. Leng
C.M. Carr
aDepartment of RadiologyMayo Clinic, Ringgold Standard InstitutionRochester, Minnesota
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
  • ORCID record for C.M. Carr

Thank you for such a thoughtful and timely letter. It certainly brings up important and actively researched points of myelographic contrast timing and the preferred study for CSF leak detection (particularly, CSF-venous fistulas).

We do agree with Drs Mamlouk and Shen on the importance of prompt imaging after contrast injection for CSF-venous fistula localization and further evaluation of sensitivity and specificity for this type of CSF leak detection with lateral decubitus CT myelography (CTM) versus lateral decubitus digital subtraction myelography (DSM). We would like to clarify, though, that our article was not investigating these issues, but rather addressing contrast conspicuity at different energy levels and the utility of dual-energy CT for CSF leak visualization.

We concur that preferred studies and even techniques for CSF-venous fistula localization vary among institutions and are usually based on institutional and proceduralist preference, comfort level, and study familiarity. We also agree with the authors of the letter that in patients with a high suspicion of a CSF-venous fistula and negative findings on lateral decubitus DSM or lateral decubitus CTM, it may be beneficial to pursue the other technique to improve leak detection. At our institution, for example, while we do perform dynamic lateral decubitus CTMs in select patients (usually with previous negative findings on lateral decubitus DSM), our initial study for CSF leak investigation in patients without extradural spinal fluid remains lateral decubitus DSM. DSM is then followed by the dual-energy CTM with the patient in the same lateral decubitus position, usually approximately 15–20 minutes after the DSM.

Given the potential intermittent nature of the CSF-venous fistulas, in our experience, this as well as other types of CSF leaks are sometimes only or better visualized on the post-DSM dual-energy CTM (particularly on 50-keV virtual monoenergetic images), which was the focus of our article. Therefore, while efforts evaluating the sensitivity and specificity of lateral decubitus DSM versus lateral decubitus CTM for CSF-venous fistula detection continue, if CT myelography (immediate dynamic or delayed as described in our article) is pursued, proceduralists should consider dual-energy CT for optimal extradural contrast visualization.

Thank you again for your letter and the effort to improve patient care in this rapidly evolving field.

  • © 2023 by American Journal of Neuroradiology
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire