Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • Advancing NeuroMRI with High-Relaxivity Contrast Agents
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates


Improved Turnaround Times | Median time to first decision: 12 days

ReplyLetter

Reply:

A. Scollato, P. Gallina and N. Di Lorenzo
American Journal of Neuroradiology February 2010, 31 (2) E28; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A1949
A. Scollato
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
P. Gallina
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site
N. Di Lorenzo
  • Find this author on Google Scholar
  • Find this author on PubMed
  • Search for this author on this site

We thank Dr Oktay Algin for his insightful comments on our article.1

We agree that the relationship between ischemia and idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) is not well understood. It still remains unclear if ischemia induces INPH or if INPH induces ischemia or if both take place. We also agree that there is no consensus on the role of stroke volume (SV) in the selection of patients to undergo shunt treatment.2–7 As previously reported,8,9 the value of SV is of little importance if it is not correlated with clinical findings for each patient and with the timing of symptom onset.

In our experience, it is clear that patients with high a SV and a short time of onset of symptoms have a higher probability of improvement with shunt treatment, compared with patients with lower SV and a longer time of symptom onset.1 Although currently SV cannot be used as an absolute tool for selection of patients who will be shunt responders, our study shows promising results in the potential utility of SV and may encourage additional studies.

Even with our data, it is hard to predict a given patient's response to shunt surgery on the basis of the SV versus time-of-symptom-onset curve because the response changes with the progression of the disease and the timing of the shunt therapy. We agree with Dr Algin that we cannot delay treatment to obtain a series of SV controls before shunt therapy. Studies comparing SV with other selection tests are currently being performed at our institution.

Currently, in our clinical practice, after submitting the patient to a baseline SV study, we select patients with INPH by a prolonged spinal drainage (PSD) of CSF. PSD is considered the present criterion standard for shunt selection in patients with INPH.10 Moreover, the immediate benefit offered by the PSD, though temporary, is encouraging for the patient and may help him or her to pursue definitive treatment with the shunt. Furthermore, for those patients for whom SV data suggest a possible irreversible state of the disease, we can give them a choice of undergoing the PSD procedure or pursuing further treatment with shunt surgery on the basis of the results from the PSD.

We hope that our study contributes to the knowledge of the etiology of this complex disease process. In addition, we hope to have contributed to a more standardized approach in the selection of patients for shunt therapy.

References

  1. 1.
    1. Scollato A,
    2. Gallina P,
    3. Gautam B,
    4. et al
    . Changes in aqueductal CSF stroke volume in shunted patients with idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2009;30:1580–86. Epub 2009 May 20
  2. 2.
    1. Kahlon B,
    2. Annertz M,
    3. Ståhlberg F,
    4. et al
    . Is aqueductal stroke volume, measured with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging scans useful in predicting outcome of shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus?. Neurosurgery 2007;60:124–30
  3. 3.
    1. Dixon GR,
    2. Friedman JA,
    3. Luetmer PH,
    4. et al
    . Use of cerebrospinal fluid flow rates measured by phase-contrast MR to predict outcome of ventriculo-peritoneal shunting for idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Mayo Clin Proc 2002;77:509–14
  4. 4.
    1. Bateman GA,
    2. Levi CR,
    3. Schofield P,
    4. et al
    . The pathophysiology of the aqueduct stroke volume in normal pressure hydrocephalus: can co-morbidity with other forms of dementia be excluded? Neuroradiology 2005;47:741–48
  5. 5.
    1. Bradley WG Jr.,
    2. Scalzo D,
    3. Queralt J,
    4. et al
    . Normal pressure hydrocephalus: evaluation with cerebrospinal fluid flow measurement at MR imaging. Radiology 1996;198:523–29
  6. 6.
    1. Kim DS,
    2. Choi JU,
    3. Huh R,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative assessment of cerebrospinal fluid hydrodynamics using a phase-contrast cine MR image in hydrocephalus. Childs Nerv Syst 1999;15:461–67
  7. 7.
    1. Mase M,
    2. Yamada K,
    3. Banno T,
    4. et al
    . Quantitative analysis of CSF flow dynamics using MRI in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Acta Neurochir Suppl 1998;71:350–53
  8. 8.
    1. Scollato A,
    2. Tenenbaum R,
    3. Bahl G,
    4. et al
    . Changes in aqueductal CSF stroke volume and progression of symptoms in patients with unshunted idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:193–98
  9. 9.
    1. Scollato A,
    2. Gallina P,
    3. Di Lorenzo N,
    4. et al
    . Is aqueductal stroke volume, measured with cine phase-contrast magnetic resonance imaging scans useful in predicting outcome of shunt surgery in suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus? Neurosurgery 2008;63:E1209, author reply E1209
  10. 10.
    1. Marmarou A,
    2. Bergsneider M,
    3. Klinge P,
    4. et al
    . The value of supplemental prognostic tests for the preoperative assessment of idiopathic normal-pressure hydrocephalus. Neurosurgery 2005;57(3 suppl):S17–28, discussion ii–v
  • Copyright © American Society of Neuroradiology
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner
  • Book Reviews

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire