Skip to main content
Advertisement

Main menu

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home

User menu

  • Alerts
  • Log in

Search

  • Advanced search
American Journal of Neuroradiology
American Journal of Neuroradiology

American Journal of Neuroradiology

ASHNR American Society of Functional Neuroradiology ASHNR American Society of Pediatric Neuroradiology ASSR
  • Alerts
  • Log in

Advanced Search

  • Home
  • Content
    • Current Issue
    • Accepted Manuscripts
    • Article Preview
    • Past Issue Archive
    • Video Articles
    • AJNR Case Collection
    • Case of the Week Archive
    • Case of the Month Archive
    • Classic Case Archive
  • Special Collections
    • AJNR Awards
    • Low-Field MRI
    • Alzheimer Disease
    • ASNR Foundation Special Collection
    • Photon-Counting CT
    • View All
  • Multimedia
    • AJNR Podcasts
    • AJNR SCANtastic
    • Trainee Corner
    • MRI Safety Corner
    • Imaging Protocols
  • For Authors
    • Submit a Manuscript
    • Submit a Video Article
    • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
    • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
    • Statistical Tips
    • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
    • Graphical Abstract Preparation
    • Imaging Protocol Submission
    • Author Policies
  • About Us
    • About AJNR
    • Editorial Board
    • Editorial Board Alumni
  • More
    • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
    • Subscribers
    • Permissions
    • Alerts
    • Feedback
    • Advertisers
    • ASNR Home
  • Follow AJNR on Twitter
  • Visit AJNR on Facebook
  • Follow AJNR on Instagram
  • Join AJNR on LinkedIn
  • RSS Feeds

AJNR Awards, New Junior Editors, and more. Read the latest AJNR updates

Index by author

May 01, 2019; Volume 40,Issue 5
  • A
  • B
  • C
  • D
  • E
  • F
  • G
  • H
  • I
  • J
  • K
  • L
  • M
  • N
  • O
  • P
  • Q
  • R
  • S
  • T
  • U
  • V
  • W
  • X
  • Y
  • Z

  1. Jang, J.

    1. Neurointervention
      You have access
      Image Quality of Low-Dose Cerebral Angiography and Effectiveness of Clinical Implementation on Diagnostic and Neurointerventional Procedures for Intracranial Aneurysms
      J. Choi, B. Kim, Y. Choi, N.Y. Shin, J. Jang, H.S. Choi, S.L. Jung and K.J. Ahn
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 827-833; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6029
  2. Jansen, N.J.G.

    1. Pediatrics
      You have access
      Brain and CSF Volumes in Fetuses and Neonates with Antenatal Diagnosis of Critical Congenital Heart Disease: A Longitudinal MRI Study
      N.H.P. Claessens, N. Khalili, I. Isgum, H. ter Heide, T.J. Steenhuis, E. Turk, N.J.G. Jansen, L.S. de Vries, J.M.P.J. Breur, R. de Heus and M.J.N.L. Benders
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 885-891; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6021
  3. Jarvik, E.R.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICESpine
      Open Access
      Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Severity by CT or MRI Does Not Predict Response to Epidural Corticosteroid versus Lidocaine Injections
      F.A. Perez, S. Quinet, J.G. Jarvik, Q.T. Nguyen, E. Aghayev, D. Jitjai, W.D. Hwang, E.R. Jarvik, S.S. Nedeljkovic, A.L. Avins, J.M. Schwalb, F.E. Diehn, C.J. Standaert, D.R. Nerenz, T. Annaswamy, Z. Bauer, D. Haynor, P.J. Heagerty and J.L. Friedly
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 908-915; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6050

      In this secondary analysis of the CT and MR imaging studies of the prospective, double-blind Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS) trial participants, the authors found no differences in baseline imaging characteristics between those receiving epidural corticosteroid and lidocaine and those receiving lidocaine alone injections. No imaging measures of spinal stenosis were associated with a differential response to corticosteroids, indicating that imaging parameters of spinal stenosis did not predict a response to epidural corticosteroids.

  4. Jarvik, J.G.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICESpine
      Open Access
      Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Severity by CT or MRI Does Not Predict Response to Epidural Corticosteroid versus Lidocaine Injections
      F.A. Perez, S. Quinet, J.G. Jarvik, Q.T. Nguyen, E. Aghayev, D. Jitjai, W.D. Hwang, E.R. Jarvik, S.S. Nedeljkovic, A.L. Avins, J.M. Schwalb, F.E. Diehn, C.J. Standaert, D.R. Nerenz, T. Annaswamy, Z. Bauer, D. Haynor, P.J. Heagerty and J.L. Friedly
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 908-915; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6050

      In this secondary analysis of the CT and MR imaging studies of the prospective, double-blind Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS) trial participants, the authors found no differences in baseline imaging characteristics between those receiving epidural corticosteroid and lidocaine and those receiving lidocaine alone injections. No imaging measures of spinal stenosis were associated with a differential response to corticosteroids, indicating that imaging parameters of spinal stenosis did not predict a response to epidural corticosteroids.

  5. Jayalakshmi, S.

    1. FELLOWS' JOURNAL CLUBPediatrics
      You have access
      Focal Cortical Dysplasia and Refractory Epilepsy: Role of Multimodality Imaging and Outcome of Surgery
      S. Jayalakshmi, S.K. Nanda, S. Vooturi, R. Vadapalli, P. Sudhakar, S. Madigubba and M. Panigrahi
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 892-898; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6041

      The authors performed a retrospective analysis of data from 188 consecutive patients with focal cortical dysplasia and refractory epilepsy with at least 2 years of postsurgery follow-up. Predictors of seizure freedom and the sensitivity of neuroimaging modalities were analyzed. MR imaging showed clear-cut FCD in 136 (72.3%) patients. Interictal FDG-PET showed focal hypo-/hypermetabolism in 144 (76.6%); in 110 patients in whom ictal SPECT was performed, focal hyperperfusion was noted in 77 (70.3%). Focal resection was the most common surgery performed in 112 (59.6%) patients. Histopathology revealed type I FCD in 102 (54.3%) patients. At last follow-up, 124 (66.0%) were seizure-free. Complete resection of FCD and type II FCD were predictors of seizure freedom. Localization of FCD on either MR imaging or PET or ictal SPECT had the highest sensitivity for seizure freedom at 97.5%. They conclude that during presurgical multimodality evaluation, localization of the extent of the epileptogenic zone in at least 2 imaging modalities helps achieve seizure freedom in about two-thirds of patients with refractory epilepsy due to FCD. FDG-PET is the most sensitive imaging modality for seizure freedom, especially in patients with type I FCD.

  6. Jeong, D.E.

    1. Neurointervention
      You have access
      Impact of Balloon-Guiding Catheter Location on Recanalization in Patients with Acute Stroke Treated by Mechanical Thrombectomy
      D.E. Jeong, J.W. Kim, B.M. Kim, W. Hwang and D.J. Kim
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 840-844; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6031
  7. Jeong, H.W.

    1. Neurointervention
      You have access
      Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction with Radial Acquisition with Subtraction-Based MRA during the Follow-Up of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
      Y.J. Heo, H.W. Jeong, J.W. Baek, S.T. Kim, Y.G. Jeong, J.Y. Lee and S.-C. Jin
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 815-819; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6035
  8. Jeong, Y.G.

    1. Neurointervention
      You have access
      Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction with Radial Acquisition with Subtraction-Based MRA during the Follow-Up of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
      Y.J. Heo, H.W. Jeong, J.W. Baek, S.T. Kim, Y.G. Jeong, J.Y. Lee and S.-C. Jin
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 815-819; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6035
  9. Jin, S.-C.

    1. Neurointervention
      You have access
      Pointwise Encoding Time Reduction with Radial Acquisition with Subtraction-Based MRA during the Follow-Up of Stent-Assisted Coil Embolization of Anterior Circulation Aneurysms
      Y.J. Heo, H.W. Jeong, J.W. Baek, S.T. Kim, Y.G. Jeong, J.Y. Lee and S.-C. Jin
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 815-819; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6035
  10. Jitjai, D.

    1. EDITOR'S CHOICESpine
      Open Access
      Lumbar Spinal Stenosis Severity by CT or MRI Does Not Predict Response to Epidural Corticosteroid versus Lidocaine Injections
      F.A. Perez, S. Quinet, J.G. Jarvik, Q.T. Nguyen, E. Aghayev, D. Jitjai, W.D. Hwang, E.R. Jarvik, S.S. Nedeljkovic, A.L. Avins, J.M. Schwalb, F.E. Diehn, C.J. Standaert, D.R. Nerenz, T. Annaswamy, Z. Bauer, D. Haynor, P.J. Heagerty and J.L. Friedly
      American Journal of Neuroradiology May 2019, 40 (5) 908-915; DOI: https://doi.org/10.3174/ajnr.A6050

      In this secondary analysis of the CT and MR imaging studies of the prospective, double-blind Lumbar Epidural Steroid Injections for Spinal Stenosis (LESS) trial participants, the authors found no differences in baseline imaging characteristics between those receiving epidural corticosteroid and lidocaine and those receiving lidocaine alone injections. No imaging measures of spinal stenosis were associated with a differential response to corticosteroids, indicating that imaging parameters of spinal stenosis did not predict a response to epidural corticosteroids.

« Previous (Pages : 1 2 ... 2) Next »
Back to top
PreviousNext

In this issue

American Journal of Neuroradiology: 40 (5)
American Journal of Neuroradiology
Vol. 40, Issue 5
1 May 2019
  • Table of Contents
  • Index by author
  • Complete Issue (PDF)
Sign up for alerts
Advertisement
  • Letters
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
Loading
Advertisement

Indexed Content

  • Current Issue
  • Accepted Manuscripts
  • Article Preview
  • Past Issues
  • Editorials
  • Editor's Choice
  • Fellows' Journal Club
  • Letters to the Editor
  • Video Articles

Cases

  • Case Collection
  • Archive - Case of the Week
  • Archive - Case of the Month
  • Archive - Classic Case

More from AJNR

  • Trainee Corner
  • Imaging Protocols
  • MRI Safety Corner

Multimedia

  • AJNR Podcasts
  • AJNR Scantastics

Resources

  • Turnaround Time
  • Submit a Manuscript
  • Submit a Video Article
  • Submit an eLetter to the Editor/Response
  • Manuscript Submission Guidelines
  • Statistical Tips
  • Fast Publishing of Accepted Manuscripts
  • Graphical Abstract Preparation
  • Imaging Protocol Submission
  • Evidence-Based Medicine Level Guide
  • Publishing Checklists
  • Author Policies
  • Become a Reviewer/Academy of Reviewers
  • News and Updates

About Us

  • About AJNR
  • Editorial Board
  • Editorial Board Alumni
  • Alerts
  • Permissions
  • Not an AJNR Subscriber? Join Now
  • Advertise with Us
  • Librarian Resources
  • Feedback
  • Terms and Conditions
  • AJNR Editorial Board Alumni

American Society of Neuroradiology

  • Not an ASNR Member? Join Now

© 2025 by the American Society of Neuroradiology All rights, including for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies, are reserved.
Print ISSN: 0195-6108 Online ISSN: 1936-959X

Powered by HighWire