Table 2:

Key features involved in thalamus L-sign injury compared with other thalamic injuries (nil and atypical)

Lobe/StructureFeaturesThalamus L-Sign (n = 85)Other (n = 14)Overall (n = 99)P Value
Thalamus score (No.) (%)Not/less involved77 (90.6)14 (100.0)91 (91.9)<.001
Markedly destroyed8 (9.4)
Parietal (No.) (%)Not involved3 (3.5)7 (50.0)10 (10.1)<.001
Involved82 (96.5)7 (50.0)89 (89.9)
Occipital (No.) (%)Not involved1 (1.2)7 (50.0)8 (8.1)<.001
Involved84 (98.8)7 (50.0)91 (91.9)
Frontal (No.) (%)Not involved10 (11.8)1 (7.1)11 (11.1)1.000
Involved75 (88.2)13 (92.9)88 (88.9)
Temporal (No.) (%)Not involved9 (10.6)6 (42.9)15 (15.2).007
Involved76 (89.4)8 (57.1)84 (84.8)
Cerebellum (No.) (%)Not involved57 (67.1)10 (71.4)67 (67.7)1.000
Involved28 (32.9)4 (28.6)32 (32.3)
Brainstem (No.) (%)Not involved74 (87.1)14 (100.0)88 (88.9).355
Involved11 (12.9)11 (11.1)