Associations between various imaging markers and histologya
| IPH(OR; 95% CI; P Value) | LRNC(OR; 95% CI; P Value) | IPH Proportion(RC; 95% CI; P Value) | Lipid Proportion(RC; 95% CI; P Value) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rim sign | OR = 2.695% CI, 0.8–8.9P value = .11 | OR = 2.995% CI, 0.3–33.9P value = .39 | RC = 4.295% CI, 0.02–8.3P value = .049b | RC = 6.195% CI, 1.5–10.6P value = .01b |
| Adventitial calcifications | OR = 5.695% CI, 1.6–21.2P value = .01b | OR = 6.795% CI, 0.8–195.7P value = .08 | RC = 6.695% CI, 1.7–11.6P value = .009b | RC = 6.695% CI, 1.0–12.1P value = .02 |
| Ulceration | OR = 1.495% CI, 0.3–7.1P value = .72 | P value = .29c | RC = 1.495% CI, −4.3–7.1P value = .6 | RC = 5.695% CI, −0.6–11.9P value = .07 |
Note:—RC indicates regression coefficient.
↵a Univariate analyses between imaging features and IPH and LRNC were calculated with logistic regression analyses with odds ratios reported; imaging features and proportions of both IPH and LRNC were calculated with linear regression analyses with regression coefficients reported.
↵b Statistically significant.
↵c Odds ratio could not be calculated for ulceration and LRNC due to relatively sparse data spreads.