Table 2:

Pair-wise comparisons between different planes performed with Bonferroni correction for biomarkers showing significant dependence on angulation (P < .05) in the repeated measures ANOVA (as per Table 1)^{^a}

Biomarker	Bi-Call, Bi-Comm	Bi-Call, Hy-Fa	Bi-Call, PBSM	Bi-Comm, Hy-Fa	Bi-Comm, PBSM	Hy-Fa, PBSM
DESH	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS
simpCA	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS
FHD	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS
ZEI	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS
CMW	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS	NS
BVR	NS	.007	.009	NS	NS	<.001
		–0.04 ± 0.01	0.07 ± 0.02			0.11 ± 0.02
THW	NS	NS	NS	.002	.014	NS
				0.24 ± 0.06	0.32 ± 0.10
CTR	NS	NS	NS	NS	.004	NS
					–0.12 ± 0.03
EI	NS	NS	<.001	NS	<.001	<.001
			–0.005 ± 0.001		–0.005 ± 0.001	–0.005 ± 0.001
FHVD	NS	NS	.014	NS	<.001	<.001
			–0.52 ± 0.17		–0.92 ± 0.20	–0.79 ± 0.17
CA	.013	NS	<.001	NS	<.001	<.001
	–1.94 ± 0.61		–7.06 ± 0.87		–9.01 ± 1.07	–8.24 ± 0.91
SVW	.034	NS	.005	NS	<.001	.001
	–0.45 ± 0.16		0.97 ± 0.28		1.42 ± 0.30	1.26 ± 0.32

Note:—Bi-Call indicates bicallosal; Bi-Comm, bicommissural; Hy-Fa, hypophysis-fastigium; PBSM, posterior brain stem margin; NS, not significant.
↵a P values (upper digit) and means ± standard errors of paired differences are calculated (n = 80) and presented for those paired tests that are statistically significant.