Table 2:

Comparison of CSvO2 percentages in fetuses and neonates in the literature

StudyCSvO2 (mean) (%)MethodSubjectsRegion
van der Hoeven
et al57
73.56 (SD, 5.25)Fiber optic catheterHealthy neonates
Buchvald et al5864.12 (SD, 4.6)NIRSHealthy neonatesFrontotemporal region
Wintermark et al5977.3 (SD, 4.7)NIRSHypothermia therapy (moderate) in neonatal HIEFrontal lobe
Wintermark et al5977.6 (SD, 6.6)NIRSHypothermia therapy (severe) in neonatal HIEFrontal lobe
De Vis et al6065.0 (SD, 13.0T2-TRIRHealthy neonatesSSS
Shetty et al4873.2 (SD, 5.5)TRUSTHypothermia therapy in neonatal HIESSS
Shetty et al4868.5 (SD, 9.6)TRUSTPost-hypothermia therapy in neonatal HIESSS
Liu et al4962.6 (SD, 8.3)TRUSTHealthy neonatesSSS
Yadav et al4467 (SD, 7)QSMHealthy fetuses (∼31 wk)SSS
Jain et al4555.2SusceptometryNeonates with congenital heart diseaseSSS
Yadav et al4662.6 (SD, 3.25)SusceptometryHealthy fetuses (∼31 wk)SSS
Neelavalli et al4766 (SD, 9.4)SusceptometryHealthy fetuses (∼34 wk)SSS
Average68.12
  • Note:—T2-TRIR indicates T2-prepared tissue relaxation inversion recovery; SSS, superior sagittal sinus; TRUST, T2-relaxation-under-spin tagging; QSM, quantitative susceptibility mapping; NIRS, near infrared resonance spectroscopy.