Table 2:

Characteristics of plaques with and without an ulcer at baseline

Ulcer Absent (n = 131)Median (IQR) or No. (%)Ulcer Present (n = 49) Median (IQR) or No. (%)Binary Logistic Regression OR (95% CI)ROC Analysis AUC (95% CI)
NASCET (%)8 (0–29)21 (0–37)1.01 (1.00–1.03)0.61 (0.52–0.71)
ECST (%)55 (45–65)59 (48–70)1.02 (1.00–1.05)
Minimal diameter (mm)4 (3.3–4.9)3.4 (2.8–4.7)0.06 (0.00–1.00)0.40 (0.30–0.50)
Total vessel volume (cm3)1.41 (1.16–1.64)1.60 (1.29–2.12)4.9 (2.1–11.4)0.64 (0.54–0.74)
Lumen volume (cm3)0.56 (0.45–0.72)0.58 (0.46–0.80)2.8 (0.6–12.1)
Wall volume (cm3)0.85 (0.70–0.98)1.02 (0.77–1.28)12.1 (3.5–42.0)0.67 (0.58–0.77)
% Wall volume59 (53–66)61 (57–68)1.01 (0.99–1.04)
LRNC presence78 (60%)38 (78%)2.4 (1.1–5.0)0.59 (0.50–0.68)
% LRNC volume1 (0–10)15 (1–31)1.7 (1.3–2.2)0.70 (0.60–0.79)
IPH presence42 (32%)27 (55%)2.6 (1.3–5.1)0.61 (0.52–0.71)
% IPH volume0 (0–3)5 (0–23)1.7 (1.3–2.2)0.67 (0.56–0.76)
Calcifications presence MR imaging118 (90%)44 (90%)0.97 (0.33–2.88)
% Calcifications volume MR imaging5 (2–8)3 (1–7)0.73 (0.50–1.07)
Calcification presence MDCTA117 (89%)45 (92%)0.74 (0.23–2.38)
Calcification absolute volume MDCTA (mm3)31.4 (4.3–80.4)15.8 (2.8–51.9)0.99 (0.999–1.002)
Thin-or-ruptured FC45 (34%)a,b32 (65%)3.4 (1.7–6.7)0.65 (0.56–0.74)
  • Note:—FC indicates fibrous cap.

  • a Four were missing.

  • b Four had bad quality.