Table 4:

Correlation between individual biomarkers and spondylodiscitis as proved on pathology and/or microbiologya

Positive Pathology and/or Microbiology
rPPPVNPVSensitivitySpecificity
Epidural enhancement
 Observer 10.37.00b61.375.665.572.1
 Observer 20.42.001b50.910010034.9
 Observer 30.39.001b49.210010030.2
 Majority consensus0.47.001b53.710010041.9
Paraspinal enhancement
 Observer 10.34.03b50.088.993.137.2
 Observer 20.27.02b44.610010016.3
 Observer 30.30.01b53.875.872.458.1
 Majority consensus0.39.01b49.210010030.2
Hyperintense T2 disc signal
 Observer 10.30.03b49.279.682.542.6
 Observer 20.15.05b31.296.295.319.6
 Observer 30.25.02b45.580.274.250.4
 Majority consensus0.28.03b48.095.293.529.8
Vertebral endplate erosion
 Observer 10.29.02b48.982.489.633.6
 Observer 20.17.03b37.595.892.527.5
 Observer 30.33.01b38.182.576.359.1
 Majority consensus0.31.02b42.691.591.834.7
Blood culture growth0.03.795059.43.497.6
Fever status0.25.03a55.269.855.269.8
Leukocytosis0.039.774055.413.883.8
Hemoglobin countc−0.02.86NANANANA
Platelet countc0.17.18NANANANA
ALP levelc0.05.73NANANANA
ESRc−0.07.62NANANANA
CRPc0.26.04aNANANANA
  • Note:—NA indicates not applicable; ALP, alkaline phosphatase.

  • a The Spearman correlation was used for rank/categoric variables.

  • b Statistically significant P values (<.05).

  • c Continuous variables in which the Pearson correlation was used.