Table 2:

OMFA vs transfer learning for various MRI model predictorsa

Predictors for ModelOMFA, LOOCV (r), and MAETL, LOOCV (r), and MAE
rCBV0.2717.790.5315.19
rCBV, EPI + C0.2518.030.6311.65
rCBV, FA0.3417.240.5811.31
rCBV, MD0.2817.740.6011.93
rCBV, T1 + C0.3316.690.6911.15
rCBV, T2WI0.2617.960.5912.30
rCBV, FA, MD0.3217.470.6611.93
rCBV, T1 + C, T2WI0.3516.610.759.03
rCBV, T1 + C, FA0.3916.550.739.07
rCBV, T1 + C, MD0.3516.770.749.41
rCBV, T2WI, FA0.3217.470.6410.94
rCBV, T2WI, MD0.2618.020.6411.15
rCBV, T1 + C, FA, MD0.3716.780.856.73
rCBV, T2WI, FA, MD0.3017.680.6910.95
rCBV, T1 + C, T2WI, FA0.3716.790.739.41
rCBV, T1 + C, T2WI, MD0.3416.880.787.01
rCBV, T1 + C, T2WI, FA, MD0.3517.050.885.66
rCBV, T1 + C, T2WI, FA, MD, EPI + C0.3417.170.866.09
  • Note:—MAE indicates mean absolute error.

  • a OMFA models were generated on the basis of linear regression analysis. Both (r) and MAE were determined using LOOCV to plot model-predicted TCD against actual TCD from spatially matched biopsies (n = 82).