Table 2:

Relationship between dual-energy CT/MR imaging and histopathologic findings for the detection of cartilage invasiona

TPTNFNFPSensitivity (%)Specificity (%)PPV (%)NPV (%)
Thyroid cartilage (n = 55)
    MRI1923013100 (82–100)64 (46–79)59 (41–76)100 (85–100)
    Dual-energy CT17362089 (67–99)100 (90–100)100 (80–100)95 (82–99)
    P valueb.5<.001
Cricoid cartilage (n = 55)
    MRI84106100 (63–100)87 (74–95)57 (29–82)100 (91–100)
    Dual-energy CT6462175 (35–97)98 (89–100)86 (42–100)96 (86–99)
    P valueb.5.06
Arytenoid cartilage (n = 110)
    MRI89111089 (52–100)91 (83–95)44 (22–69)99 (94–100)
    Dual-energy CT6983367 (30–93)97 (92–100)67 (30–93)97 (92–99)
    P valuec.43.09
All cartilage (n = 220)
    MRI3515512997 (85–100)84 (78–89)55 (42–67)99 (96–100)
    Dual-energy CT291807481 (64–92)98 (95–99)88 (72–97)96 (92–98)
    P valuec.16<.004
  • Note:—TP indicates true positive; TN, true negative; FP, false positive; FN, false negative; PPV, positive predictive value; NPV, negative predictive value.

  • a Numbers in parentheses are 95% confidence intervals. Negative findings for cartilage invasion are scores 1 and 2; positive findings are scores 3–5.

  • b As determined with the McNemar test.

  • c According to the generalized linear mixed model that accounted for the multiple observations within patients.