Table 2:

Comparison of perfusion and volumetric data for cGM, NAWM, and T2h-l between HCs and subjects with RRMS and SPMS after adjusting for confounding factorsa

ParameterMedian (Interquartiles)P Value
HC (n = 19)RRMS (n = 19)SPMS (n = 20)RRMS vs HCSPMS vs HCSPMS vs RRMS
cGM
    Global volume890 (869–914)864 (827–895)673 (646–697).10.0026b.0020b
    CBF43.20 (33.91–54.49)41.07 (29.85–55.68)34.05 (27.19–43.68)<.0001b<.0001b.0011b
    CBV2.64 (2.02–3.29)2.53 (1.94–3.37)2.40 (1.92–3.07).078.046.0062b
    MTT3.77 (3.20–4.31)3.90 (3.32–4.41)4.30 (3.66–4.99).0001b<.0001b<.0001b
NAWM
    Global volume878 (812–894)818 (738–850)697 (669–729).0115b.0011b.0049b
    CBF23.49 (18.69–27.78)21.55 (16.05–29.50)19.54 (16.74–24.92).68.58.0080b
    CBV1.59 (1.28–2.00)1.57 (1.17–2.15)1.51 (1.30–1.98).89.16.0103b
    MTT4.51 (4.09–5.10)4.62 (4.08–5.20)4.86 (4.28–5.41).25.0005b.0094b
T2h-l
    Global volume0.005.4 (1.2–9.3)6.4 (1.0–10.9)NANA.82
    CBF0.0012.77 (8.23–17.24)11.15 (8.95–15.71)NANA.049
    CBV0.000.99 (0–1.32)1.08 (0.83–1.47)NANA.0026b
    MTT0.004.91 (4.00–5.63)5.64 (4.82–6.30)NANA.43
  • Note:—NA, not applicable.

  • a Bonferroni-corrected P < .017 is considered statistically significant. Age was considered a confounding factor for comparing RRMS vs HC and SPMS vs HC; age, EDSS, and disease duration were considered confounding factors for comparing SPMS vs RRMS. All volumes are in cubic centimeters; CBF, milliliter/100 gram/meter; CBV, milliliter/100 gram; MTT, second.

  • b Significant.