Table 2:

Results of each parameter by ROC analysis

AUC (χ2 test Compared with AUC = 0.5)AUC, 95% CICutoff ValueSensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)
MET ratio0.90 (P < .01)0.75–1.051.420.90 (±0.026)0.75 (±0.082)
CER av0.81 (P < .01)0.58–1.040.610.80 (±0.035)0.88 (±0.023)
MaxSlope av0.80 (P < .05)0.58–1.020.010.90 (±0.014)0.50 (±0.098)
IAUGC av0.78 (P < .05)0.55–1.000.20.60 (±0.078)1.0 (0)
fPV av0.760.53–0.990.020.50 (±0.082)0.88 (±0.017)
BAT av0.760.48–1.0344.00.70 (±0.046)0.75 (±0.041)
Ktrans av0.740.49–0.990.050.70 (±0.046)0.67 (±0.041)
Ve av0.680.41–0.950.270.60 (±0.052)0.63 (±0.051)
ADC min0.600.32–0.880.730.60 (±0.039)0.25 (±0.061)
Kep av0.550.26–0.840.320.80 (±0.026)0.50 (±0.082)
FDG ratio0.530.23–0.820.970.40 (±0.059)0.50 (±0.049)
  • Note:—AUC indicates area under the curve; av, average; min, minimum; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.