Correlation between manual and estimated coverage values for the construct pictured in Fig 5a
| 3.5-mm-Vessel Manual Segmentation | Manual | Estimated |
|---|---|---|
| 3.75 PED | 22% | |
| 3.75 + 4.25 PED | 36%–37% | 36%–37% |
| 4.25 PED | 18%–19% |
↵a Manual segmentation was done by tracing curved lines over each braid in the double-coverage area and comparing the result with values estimated by overlapping segmented images from separate 3.75- and 4.25-mm devices individually deployed within a 3.5-mm artificial vessel. The 2 methods are in excellent agreement.