TABLE

Review of pathologically proved CJD cases with positive DW imaging findings reported in the literature

ReportPatient Age (y)/SexTime of Study after Onset of Symptoms (mo)Location of Hyperintensity on DW ImageMR Imaging (T2/FLAIR) AbnormalitiesOthers Findings
Demaerel et al 1997 (6)68/F1Cortex(+) T2(+) EEG
Bahn et al 1997 (7)61/F4Basal ganglia/cortex(+/−) FLAIR> T2(−) EEG
Samman et al 1999 (8)68/F8Basal ganglia/cortex(+) T2(−) EEG (−) CSF
Demaerel et al 1999 (9)68/F0.75, 1.75Basal ganglia/cortex(+/−) T2NP
65/M2Basal ganglia/cortex(−)NP
59/F1, 1.5Basal ganglia/cortex(−)NP
Bahn et al 1999 (10)61/F7Basal ganglia(+) FLAIR > T2(+) CSF
53/F1Basal ganglia(+) T2NP
64/F2Cortex(+/−) FLAIR(+) CSF
Yee et al 1999 (11)69/M1.5Cortex(−)(+) EEG
Kropp et al 2000 (12)68/F9Basal ganglia/cortex(+/−)(+) CSF
70/F7Basal ganglia(+/−)(+) CSF
58/M5Basal ganglia(+/−)(+) CSF
48/M3Basal ganglia/cortex(+/−)(+) CSF
68/F1Basal ganglia(+/−)(+) CSF
Romi et al 2000 (13)54/F8Basal ganglia/co rtex(−)(−) EEG
Current case63/M4, 5.5, 6Cortex(+/−) FLAIR(+) EEG (−) CSF
  • Note.—CSF markers used were 14-3-3 protein or neuron-specific enolase. (+) indicates positive findings; (+/−), subtle findings; (−), negative findings; NP, no other studies were performed.