Table 4:

Correlations between the variables included in the regression models predicting NC/AD classification and the change in CDR-SB (n = 49) and MMSE (n = 51) scores across 2 years in the MCI group^a

	CDR-SB Change	MMSE Change	LM-Del Change
MRI hippocampus	−.29	.29	.41^b
MRI entorhinal	−.17	.23	.34
MRI retrosplenial	−.43^b	.42^b	.35
PET entorhinal	−.30	.38^b	.28
PET retrosplenial	−.22	.47^b	.11
PET lat. orbitofrontal	−.02	.27	−.05
T-τ:Aβ42	.02	.08	−.23

a The variables explaining the unique variance within each method, as listed in Table 2, were included in the set of predictor variables (ie, for MR imaging, hippocampal volume and retrosplenial and entorhinal thickness; for PET, entorhinal, retrosplenial, and lateral orbitofrontal metabolism; and for CSF, the ratio of t-τ:Aβ42).
b P < .05, corrected for 7 comparisons.