Table 6:

Procedure-related adverse events and mortality: comparison of assist device versus unassisted coiling cases

Randomized Treatment
HydrogelBare PlatinumAbsolute Difference
No.%No.%(95% CI)
Procedure-related adverse event
    Stent used in acutely ruptured aneurysm2/366.72/366.70% (−53% to +53%)
    Stent used in unruptured aneurysm7/4316.39/4918.4−2.1% (−17% to +14%)
    Balloon/other assist used in acutely ruptured aneurysm9/3228.18/3026.7+1.5% (−20% to +23%)
    Balloon/other assist used in unruptured aneurysm9/3823.76/3119.4+4.3% (−16% to +23%)
    No assist device, acutely ruptured aneurysm18/10417.322/10121.8−4.5% (−15% to +6.4%)
    No assist device, unruptured aneurysm2/287.16/3417.6−10.5% (−27% to +7.6%)
Mortality rate (0–3 months)
    Stent used in acutely ruptured aneurysm2/366.72/366.70% (−53% to +53%)
    Stent used in unruptured aneurysm0/4301/492.0−2% (−11% to +6.3%)
    Balloon/other assist used in acutely ruptured aneurysm4/3212.51/303.3+9.2% (−6.1% to +25%)
    Balloon/other assist used in unruptured aneurysm1/382.60/310+2.6% (−8.6% to +14%)
    No assist device, acutely ruptured aneurysm2/1041.91/1011.0+0.9% (−3.7% to +5.8%)
    No assist device, unruptured aneurysm0/2800/3400% (−10% to +12%)
  • Note:—CI indicates confidence interval.