Table 3:

Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, NPV, and PPV of the different imaging techniques for the diagnosis of angiographic vasospasm

Presence or Absence of Angiographic VasospasmDSA Gold StandardTCD Absolute FV (cm/s)TCD EICA RatiosNCT HypodensitiesCTAPCT rCBV (cc × 100 g−1)PCT rCBF (cc × 100 g−1 × min−1)PCT MTT (s)PCT TTP (s)
Thresholds>120>3.00Presence or AbsencePresence or Absence<4.4<44.3>6.4>24.4
TN507449455498483378477460452
FP058529241293074755
FN04035108308924616
TP123838815933499117107
Accuracy100.0%84.4%86.2%81.4%91.4%65.4%91.4%91.6%88.7%
Sensitivity100.0%67.5%71.5%12.2%75.6%27.6%80.5%95.1%87.0%
Specificity100.0%88.6%89.7%98.2%95.3%74.6%94.1%90.7%89.2%
NPV100.0%91.8%92.9%82.2%94.2%80.9%95.2%98.7%96.6%
PPV100.0%58.9%62.9%62.5%79.5%20.9%76.7%71.3%66.0%
  • Note:— MTT with a threshold of 6.4 s was the most accurate parameter for the diagnosis of angiographic vasospasm, with especially a very high negative predictive value of 98.7%. FV indicates flow velocity; EICA, extracranial to intracranial; rCBV, relative cerebral blood volume; rCBF, relative cerebral blood flow; MTT, mean transit time; TTP, time-to-peak; TP, true- positives; FP, false-positives; FN, false-negatives; TP, true-positives; NPV, negative predictive value; PPV, positive predictive value.