Overall image quality and diagnostic confidence of arterial findings, PCD-CT versus EID-CT
| Session 1: PCD-SR vs EID-SR | PCD-SR (1–5) | EID-SR (1–5) | P Value | B vs. A (−2 to 2) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reader 1 | ||||
| Overall image quality | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | |
| Diagnostic confidence (0–100) | 90.4 ± 9.1 | 74.2 ± 15.9 | <.001 | 0.8 ± 0.8 |
| Reader 2 | ||||
| Overall image quality | 4.9 ± 0.4 | 3.5 ± 0.5 | <.001 | 1.0 ± 0.0 |
| Diagnostic confidence (0–100) | 86.4 ± 8.8 | 70.4 ± 7.9 | <.001 | 0.5 ± 0.8 |
| Reader 1 & 2 combined | ||||
| Overall image quality | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 3.3 ± 0.4 | <.001 | 1.0 ± 0.0 |
| Diagnostic confidence (0–100) | 88.4 ± 9.1 | 72.3 ± 12.6 | <.001 | 0.7 ± 0.8 |
| Session 2: PCD-UHR-CNN vs EID-SR | PCD-UHR-CNN (1–5) | EID-SR (1–5) | P value | B vs. A (−2 to 2) |
| Reader 1 | ||||
| Overall image quality | 4.0 ± 0.0 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | 1.0 ± 0.0 | |
| Diagnostic confidence (0–100) | 93 ± 5.8 | 78.2 ± 9.3 | <.001 | 0.6 ± 1.4 |
| Reader 2 | ||||
| Overall image quality | 4.9 ± 0.3 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | <.001 | 1.9 ± 0.3 |
| Diagnostic confidence (0–100) | 88.6 ± 5.9 | 70.4 ± 5 | <.001 | 1.0 ± 1.5 |
| Reader 1 & 2 combined | ||||
| Overall image quality | 4.5 ± 0.5 | 3.0 ± 0.0 | <.001 | 1.5 ± 0.5 |
| Diagnostic confidence (0–100) | 90.8 ± 6.2 | 74.3 ± 8.4 | <.001 | 0.8 ± 1.4 |