Table 3:

Performance comparisons for ordinal mRS prediction between the DLPD and the clinical readersa

Gwet ACMAE±1ACC (%)ACC (%)
Model/readers
 Neuroradiologist I0.70 (0.60–0.80)1.15 (0.94–1.38)71 (60–81)26 (18–36)
 Neuroradiologist II0.69 (0.59–0.79)1.14 (0.93–1.38)70 (60–80)29 (19–39)
 Neuroradiology fellow0.73 (0.65–0.81)1.04 (0.85–1.24)74 (6–84)31 (21–41)
Clinical readers
 Neurologist I0.75 (0.66–0.84)1.03 (0.83–1.25)75 (65–84)32 (22–44)
 Neurologist II0.77 (0.67–0.86)0.91 (0.70–1.15)79 (69–88)41 (30–51)
Consensus read0.76 (0.67–0.84)0.95 (0.75–1.17)79 (70–88)36 (25–46)
DLPD0.79 (0.71–0.86)0.89 (0.70–1.11)81 (73–90)36 (26–46)
P valueP < .001P = .02P < .001P = .07
  • a The data in the parentheses represent the 95% confidence interval. The P value is for the noninferiority test between the consensus clinical reads and the DLPD with the predefined margin of 0.1 (MAE)/10% (±1ACC, ACC). The Gwet AC for agreement among 5 clinical readers is 0.83 (95% CI, 0.80–0.86), justifying the comparison with a consensus.