Table 2:

Safety and efficacy results

FactorsDifferent Groups
LPBS (n = 25)FD (n = 22)P Value
Safety results
 Clinical outcomea
  Good (mRS ≤2)14 (56%)13 (59.1%).831
  Poor (mRS 2)11 (44%)9 (40.9%)
Changes in symptoms
 Nonaggravated13 (52%)14 (63.6%).421
 Aggravated12 (48%)8 (36.4%)
New neurologic deficits due to procedural complications
 Total6 (24%)9 (40.9%).215
 Hemorrhagic1 (4%)2 (9.1%).476
 Ischemic5 (20%)9 (40.9%).118
  Mild-to-severe disability6 (24%)6 (27.3%).861
  Neurologic death3 (12%)2 (9.1%).747
Efficacy results
 Angiographic occlusionb
  Complete2 (10%)7 (41.2%).028
  Near-complete12 (60%)7 (41.2%).254
  Incomplete6 (30%)3 (17.6%).383
 Progression of mass effect
  Nonprogressed10 (50%)12 (70.6%).204
  Progressed10 (50%)5 (29.4%)
  • a Clinical follow-up data were available for all 47 of the 47 patients included.

  • b Radiologic imaging follow-up data for evaluating angiographic occlusion and progression of mass effect was available for 37 of the 47 patients included, 20 of the 25 patients in LPBS group and 17 of the 22 patients in FD group. Three surviving patients were lost to radiologic imaging follow-up due to poor status.