RT Journal Article
SR Electronic
T1 Endovascular Treatment for Tentorial Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas: A Retrospective Single-Center Study
JF American Journal of Neuroradiology
JO Am. J. Neuroradiol.
FD American Society of Neuroradiology
DO 10.3174/ajnr.A8676
A1 Zhang, Guanghao
A1 Pang, Miao
A1 Li, Zhe
A1 Shang, Chenghao
A1 Zhang, Yuhang
A1 Zhang, Qi
A1 Huang, Qinghai
A1 Xu, Yi
A1 Duan, Guoli
A1 Li, Qiang
A1 Liu, Jianmin
YR 2025
UL http://www.ajnr.org/content/early/2025/07/03/ajnr.A8676.abstract
AB BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Current evidence suggests that tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas with endovascular treatment offer a high rate of occlusion and reduced procedural risks. We report the clinical and angiographic outcomes in patients with tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas who underwent endovascular treatment as first-line treatment.MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 83 patients with tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas treated at our center from April 2009 to November 2023 by using endovascular treatment. Patient demographics, clinical presentations, angiographics, treatment results, and follow-up outcomes were registered. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression were performed to identify the onset of intracranial hemorrhage predictors, procedure-related complications predictors, and predictors of poor functional outcome.RESULTS: Eighty-three patients underwent endovascular treatment as first-line treatment. Most patients (80.7%) were symptomatic, and a total of 25 patients (30.1%) presented with intracranial hemorrhage. The presence of deep venous drainage and midline location were associated with a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage. Middle meningeal artery (57.8%, 48/83) and pial artery (15.7%, 13/83) were the most frequently used access routes for embolization. A total of 74 (89.1%) tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas were completely occluded immediately after the last endovascular treatment session. Complications occurred in 11 patients (13.3%). Six-month angiographic follow-up was performed in 68 patients (81.8%), and 91.2% (62/68) of tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas were occluded. At clinical follow-up (100%, 83/83), good functional outcome (mRS 0–2) was documented in 74 (89.1%) patients. Logistic regression analysis identified baseline mRS 3–5 as the most significant independent predictor of poor functional outcome. Subgroup analysis showed no statistically significant differences in baseline characteristics, angiography, and clinical results between patients treated with targeted pial artery embolization and nontargeted pial artery embolization.CONCLUSIONS: Endovascular treatment is a safe and effective primary technique for managing tentorial dural arteriovenous fistulas, achieving high rates of complete angiographic occlusion and favorable functional outcomes. Transarterial embolization, predominantly via the middle meningeal artery, was the mainstay of treatment. In patients with pial arterial feeders, omitting aggressive embolization did not compromise efficacy or increase complications.DAVFdural arteriovenous fistulaEVTendovascular treatmentMMAmiddle meningeal arteryTAEtransarterial embolizationTDAVFtentorial dural arteriovenous fistulaTVEtransvenous embolization