Imaging Features of Symptomatic MCA Stenosis in Patients of Different Ages: A Vessel Wall MR Imaging Study

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Bejot Y,
   2. Bailly H,
   3. Durier J, et al

   . Epidemiology of stroke in Europe and trends for the 21st century. Presse Med 2016;45:e391–98 doi:10.1016/j.lpm.2016.10.003 pmid:27816343

   CrossRefPubMed
2. 2.↵
   1. Feigin VL,
   2. Roth GA,
   3. Naghavi MG, et al

   ; Global Burden of Diseases, Injuries and Risk Factors Study 2013 and Stroke Experts Writing Group. Global burden of stroke and risk factors in 188 countries, during 1990-2013: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2013. Lancet Neurol 2016;15:913–24 PMC doi:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30073-4 pmid:27291521

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   1. Bodle JD,
   2. Feldmann E,
   3. Swartz RH, et al

   . High-resolution magnetic resonance imaging: an emerging tool for evaluating intracranial arterial disease. Stroke 2013;44:287–92 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.664680 pmid:23204050

   FREE Full Text
4. 4.↵
   1. Li ML,
   2. Xu WH,
   3. Song L, et al

   . Atherosclerosis of middle cerebral artery: evaluation with high-resolution MR imaging at 3T. Atherosclerosis 2009;204:447–52 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2008.10.019 pmid:19041971

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Majidi S,
   2. Sein J,
   3. Watanabe M, et al

   . Intracranial-derived atherosclerosis assessment: an in vitro comparison between virtual histology by intravascular ultrasonography, 7T MRI, and histopathologic findings. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:2259–64 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3631 pmid:23811977

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
6. 6.↵
   1. Swartz RH,
   2. Bhuta SS,
   3. Farb RI, et al

   . Intracranial arterial wall imaging using high-resolution 3-Tesla contrast-enhanced MRI. Neurology 2009;72:627–34 doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000342470.69739.b3 pmid:19221296

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Turan TN,
   2. Rumboldt Z,
   3. Granholm AC, et al

   . Intracranial atherosclerosis: correlation between in-vivo 3T high resolution MRI and pathology. Atherosclerosis 2014;237:460–63 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2014.10.007 pmid:25463074

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   1. Chen XY,
   2. Wong KS,
   3. Lam WW, et al

   . High signal on T1 sequence of magnetic resonance imaging confirmed to be intraplaque haemorrhage by histology in middle cerebral artery. Int J Stroke 2014;9:E19 doi:10.1111/ijs.12277 pmid:24798044

   CrossRefPubMed
9. 9.↵
   1. van der Kolk AG,
   2. Zwanenburg JJ,
   3. Denswil NP, et al

   . Imaging the intracranial atherosclerotic vessel wall using 7T MRI: initial comparison with histopathology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015;36:694–701 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4178 pmid:25477359

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Nakamura Y,
    2. Yamaguchi Y,
    3. Makita N, et al

    . Clinical and radiological characteristics of intracranial artery dissection using recently proposed diagnostic criteria. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis 2019;28:1691–1702 doi:10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2019.02.019 pmid:30898444

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    1. Mandell DM,
    2. Mossa-Basha M,
    3. Qiao Y, et al

    ; Vessel Wall Imaging Study Group of the American Society of Neuroradiology. Intracranial vessel wall MRI: principles and expert consensus recommendations of the American Society of Neuroradiology. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2017;38:218–29 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A4893 pmid:27469212

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Ryoo S,
    2. Cha J,
    3. Kim SJ, et al

    . High-resolution magnetic resonance wall imaging findings of Moyamoya disease. Stroke 2014;45:2457–60 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.004761 pmid:24947295

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Xu YY,
    2. Li ML,
    3. Gao S, et al

    . Etiology of intracranial stenosis in young patients: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Ann Transl Med 2017;5:319 doi:10.21037/atm.2017.06.31 pmid:28861416

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    1. Kim DK,
    2. Verdoorn JT,
    3. Gunderson TM, et al

    . Comparison of non-contrast vessel wall imaging and 3D time-of-flight MRA for atherosclerotic stenosis and plaque characterization within intracranial arteries. J Neuroradiol 2020;47:266–71 doi:10.1016/j.neurad.2019.05.003 pmid:31136749

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Xu WH,
    2. Li ML,
    3. Gao S, et al

    . In vivo high-resolution MR imaging of symptomatic and asymptomatic middle cerebral artery atherosclerotic stenosis. Atherosclerosis 2010;212:507–11 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2010.06.035 pmid:20638663

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Varnava AM,
    2. Mills PG,
    3. Davies MJ

    . Relationship between coronary artery remodeling and plaque vulnerability. Circulation 2002;105:939–43 doi:10.1161/hc0802.104327 pmid:11864922

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
17. 17.↵
    1. Harteveld AA,
    2. Denswil NP,
    3. Van Hecke W, et al

    . Ex vivo vessel wall thickness measurements of the human circle of Willis using 7T MRI. Atherosclerosis 2018;273:106–14 doi:10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2018.04.023 pmid:29715587

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Zhang D,
    2. Chen Y,
    3. Chen H, et al

    . A high-resolution MRI study of relationship between remodeling patterns and ischemic stroke in patients with atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery stenosis. Front Aging Neurosci 2017;9:140 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2017.00140 pmid:28536522

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    1. Ter-Karapetyan A,
    2. Triphan SM,
    3. Jobst BJ, et al

    . Towards quantitative perfusion MRI of the lung in COPD: the problem of short-term repeatability. PLoS One 2018;13:e0208587doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208587 pmid:30532179

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Xu WH,
    2. Li ML,
    3. Gao S, et al

    . Middle cerebral artery intraplaque hemorrhage: prevalence and clinical relevance. Ann Neurol 2012;71:195–98 doi:10.1002/ana.22626 pmid:22367991

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    1. Qiao Y,
    2. Zeiler S,
    3. Mirbagheri S, et al

    . Intracranial plaque enhancement in patients with cerebrovascular events on high-spatial-resolution MR images. Radiology 2014;271:534–42 doi:10.1148/radiol.13122812 pmid:24475850

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Maaijwee NA,
    2. Rutten-Jacobs LC,
    3. Schaapsmeerders P, et al

    . Ischaemic stroke in young adults: risk factors and long-term consequences. Nat Rev Neurol 2014;10:315–25 doi:10.1038/nrneurol.2014.72 pmid:24776923

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    1. Mossa-Basha M,
    2. Hwang WD,
    3. De Havenon A, et al

    . Multicontrast high-resolution vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging and its value in differentiating intracranial vasculopathic processes. Stroke 2015;46:1567–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.115.009037 pmid:25953365

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Tan H,
    2. Chen X,
    3. Maingard J, et al

    . Intracranial vessel wall imaging with magnetic resonance imaging: current techniques and applications. World Neurosurg 2018;112:186–98 doi:10.1016/j.wneu.2018.01.083 pmid:29360586

    CrossRefPubMed
25. 25.↵
    1. O’Donnell MJ,
    2. Xavier D,
    3. Liu L, et al

    ; INTERSTROKE investigators. Risk factors for ischaemic and intracerebral haemorrhagic stroke in 22 countries (the INTERSTROKE study): a case-control study. Lancet 2010;376:112–23 doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(10)60834-3 pmid:20561675

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
26. 26.↵
    1. Mandell DM,
    2. Matouk CC,
    3. Farb RI, et al

    . Vessel wall MRI to differentiate between reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and central nervous system vasculitis: preliminary results. Stroke 2012;43:860–62 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.111.626184 pmid:22156692

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. 27.↵
    1. Ahn SH,
    2. Lee J,
    3. Kim YJ, et al

    . Isolated MCA disease in patients without significant atherosclerotic risk factors: a high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke 2015;46:697–703 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.114.008181 pmid:25628303

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
28. 28.↵
    1. Obusez EC,
    2. Hui F,
    3. Hajj-Ali RA, et al

    . High-resolution MRI vessel wall imaging: spatial and temporal patterns of reversible cerebral vasoconstriction syndrome and central nervous system vasculitis. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2014;35:1527–32 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3909 pmid:24722305

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. 29.↵
    1. Van Rooij JL,
    2. Rutgers DR,
    3. Spliet WG, et al

    . Vessel wall enhancement on MRI in the diagnosis of primary central nervous system vasculitis. Int J Stroke 2018;13:NP24–27 doi:10.1177/1747493018789276 pmid:30102571

    CrossRefPubMed
30. 30.↵
    1. Sikkema T,
    2. Uyttenboogaart M,
    3. Eshghi O, et al

    . Intracranial artery dissection. Eur J Neurol 2014;21:820–26 doi:10.1111/ene.12384 pmid:24824740

    CrossRefPubMed
31. 31.↵
    1. Li S,
    2. Yan B,
    3. Kaye A, et al

    . Prognosis of intracranial dissection relates to site and presenting features. J Clin Neurosci 2011;18:789–93 doi:10.1016/j.jocn.2010.11.006 pmid:21507658

    CrossRefPubMed