
<!DOCTYPE article
  PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD JATS (Z39.96) Journal Archiving and Interchange DTD with MathML3 v1.3 20210610//EN" "JATS-archivearticle1-3-mathml3.dtd">
<article xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" dtd-version="1.3" article-type="research-article" xml:lang="en"><processing-meta tagset-family="jats" base-tagset="archiving" mathml-version="3.0" table-model="xhtml"><custom-meta-group><custom-meta assigning-authority="highwire" xlink:type="simple"><meta-name>recast-jats-build</meta-name><meta-value>1d2b230b09</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></processing-meta><front><journal-meta><journal-id journal-id-type="hwp">jitc</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="nlm-ta">J Immunother Cancer</journal-id><journal-id journal-id-type="publisher-id">jitc</journal-id><journal-title-group><journal-title>Journal for ImmunoTherapy of Cancer</journal-title><abbrev-journal-title abbrev-type="publisher">J Immunother Cancer</abbrev-journal-title><abbrev-journal-title>J Immunother Cancer</abbrev-journal-title></journal-title-group><issn pub-type="epub">2051-1426</issn><publisher><publisher-name>BMJ Publishing Group Ltd</publisher-name></publisher></journal-meta><article-meta><article-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">jitc-2020-001636</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/jitc-2020-001636</article-id><article-id pub-id-type="apath" assigning-authority="highwire">/jitc/9/2/e001636.atom</article-id><article-categories><subj-group subj-group-type="heading"><subject>Clinical/translational cancer immunotherapy</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="collection" assigning-authority="publisher"><subject>Open access</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="collection" assigning-authority="publisher"><subject>Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy</subject></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="collection" assigning-authority="highwire"><subject>Special collections</subject><subj-group><subject>JITC</subject><subj-group><subject>Clinical/Translational Cancer Immunotherapy</subject></subj-group></subj-group></subj-group><subj-group subj-group-type="collection" assigning-authority="highwire"><subject>Special collections</subject><subj-group><subject>Open access</subject></subj-group></subj-group><series-title>Original research</series-title></article-categories><title-group><article-title>Combination of vasculature targeting, hypofractionated radiotherapy, and immune checkpoint inhibitor elicits potent antitumor immune response and blocks tumor progression</article-title></title-group><contrib-group><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-80634003" xlink:type="simple"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3082-1291</contrib-id><name name-style="western"><surname>Pierini</surname><given-names>Stefano</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81522551" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Mishra</surname><given-names>Abhishek</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81522806" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Perales-Linares</surname><given-names>Renzo</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81522857" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Uribe-Herranz</surname><given-names>Mireia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81522972" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Beghi</surname><given-names>Silvia</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81523018" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Giglio</surname><given-names>Andrea</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81523101" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Pustylnikov</surname><given-names>Sergei</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81697832" xlink:type="simple"><contrib-id contrib-id-type="orcid" authenticated="false">http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4784-4556</contrib-id><name name-style="western"><surname>Costabile</surname><given-names>Francesca</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81523527" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Rafail</surname><given-names>Stavros</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81523226" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Amici</surname><given-names>Augusto</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff3">3</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81523646" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Facciponte</surname><given-names>John G</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" id="author-81523568" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Koumenis</surname><given-names>Costantinos</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref></contrib><contrib contrib-type="author" corresp="yes" id="author-81522476" xlink:type="simple"><name name-style="western"><surname>Facciabene</surname><given-names>Andrea</given-names></name><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff1">1</xref><xref ref-type="aff" rid="aff2">2</xref></contrib></contrib-group><aff id="aff1"><label>1</label><institution content-type="department" xlink:type="simple">Department of Radiation Oncology, Perelman School of Medicine</institution>, <institution xlink:type="simple">University of Pennsylvania</institution>, <addr-line content-type="city">Philadelphia</addr-line>, <addr-line content-type="state">Pennsylvania</addr-line>, <country>USA</country></aff><aff id="aff2"><label>2</label><institution content-type="department" xlink:type="simple">Ovarian Cancer Research Center</institution>, <institution xlink:type="simple">University of Pennsylvania</institution>, <addr-line content-type="city">Philadelphia</addr-line>, <addr-line content-type="state">Pennsylvania</addr-line>, <country>USA</country></aff><aff id="aff3"><label>3</label><institution content-type="department" xlink:type="simple">School of Biosciences and Veterinary Medicine</institution>, <institution xlink:type="simple">University of Camerino</institution>, <addr-line content-type="city">Camerino</addr-line>, <addr-line content-type="state">Marche</addr-line>, <country>Italy</country></aff><author-notes><corresp><label>Correspondence to</label> Dr Andrea Facciabene; <email xlink:type="simple">facciabe@pennmedicine.upenn.edu</email></corresp><fn fn-type="other"><p>CK and AF are shared supervision.</p></fn></author-notes><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-02" pub-type="ppub" publication-format="print"><month>2</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date date-type="pub" iso-8601-date="2021-02-09" pub-type="epub-original" publication-format="electronic"><day>9</day><month>2</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date iso-8601-date="2021-01-31T18:12:27-08:00" pub-type="hwp-received"><day>31</day><month>1</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><pub-date iso-8601-date="2021-01-31T18:12:27-08:00" pub-type="hwp-created"><day>31</day><month>1</month><year>2021</year></pub-date><volume>9</volume><issue>2</issue><elocation-id>e001636</elocation-id><history><date date-type="accepted" iso-8601-date="2020-12-15"><day>15</day><month>12</month><year>2020</year></date></history><permissions><copyright-statement>© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2021. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.</copyright-statement><copyright-year>2021</copyright-year><license license-type="open-access" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" xlink:type="simple"><ali:license_ref xmlns:ali="http://www.niso.org/schemas/ali/1.0/" start_date="2021-02-09">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ali:license_ref><license-p>This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See <ext-link ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" xlink:type="simple">http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/</ext-link>.</license-p></license></permissions><self-uri content-type="pdf" xlink:href="jitc-2020-001636.pdf" xlink:type="simple"/><abstract><sec><title>Background</title><p>Tumor endothelial marker 1 (TEM1) is a protein expressed in the tumor-associated endothelium and/or stroma of various types of cancer. We previously demonstrated that immunization with a plasmid-DNA vaccine targeting TEM1 reduced tumor progression in three murine cancer models. Radiation therapy (RT) is an established cancer modality used in more than 50% of patients with solid tumors. RT can induce tumor-associated vasculature injury, triggering immunogenic cell death and inhibition of the irradiated tumor and distant non-irradiated tumor growth (abscopal effect). Combination treatment of RT with TEM1 immunotherapy may complement and augment established immune checkpoint blockade.</p></sec><sec><title>Methods</title><p>Mice bearing bilateral subcutaneous CT26 colorectal or TC1 lung tumors were treated with a novel heterologous TEM1-based vaccine, in combination with RT, and anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) antibody or combinations of these therapies, tumor growth of irradiated and abscopal tumors was subsequently assessed. Analysis of tumor blood perfusion was evaluated by CD31 staining and Doppler ultrasound imaging. Immunophenotyping of peripheral and tumor-infiltrating immune cells as well as functional analysis was analyzed by flow cytometry, ELISpot assay and adoptive cell transfer (ACT) experiments.</p></sec><sec><title>Results</title><p>We demonstrate that addition of RT to heterologous TEM1 vaccination reduces progression of CT26 and TC1 irradiated and abscopal distant tumors as compared with either single treatment. Mechanistically, RT increased major histocompatibility complex class I molecule (MHCI) expression on endothelial cells and improved immune recognition of the endothelium by anti-TEM1 T cells with subsequent severe vascular damage as measured by reduced microvascular density and tumor blood perfusion. Heterologous TEM1 vaccine and RT combination therapy boosted tumor-associated antigen (TAA) cross-priming (ie, anti-gp70) and augmented programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/PD-L1 signaling within CT26 tumor. Blocking the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in combination with dual therapy further increased the antitumor effect and gp70-specific immune responses. ACT experiments show that anti-gp70 T cells are required for the antitumor effects of the combination therapy.</p></sec><sec><title>Conclusion</title><p>Our findings describe novel cooperative mechanisms between heterologous TEM1 vaccination and RT, highlighting the pivotal role that TAA cross-priming plays for an effective antitumor strategy. Furthermore, we provide rationale for using heterologous TEM1 vaccination and RT as an add-on to immune checkpoint blockade as triple combination therapy into early-phase clinical trials.</p></sec></abstract><kwd-group><kwd>radiotherapy</kwd><kwd>immunotherapy</kwd><kwd>vaccination</kwd></kwd-group><funding-group specific-use="FundRef"><award-group id="funding-1" xlink:type="simple"><funding-source xlink:type="simple"><institution-wrap><institution xlink:type="simple">NIH/NCI</institution></institution-wrap></funding-source><award-id xlink:type="simple">5R01CA206012-04</award-id></award-group></funding-group><custom-meta-group><custom-meta xlink:type="simple"><meta-name>special-feature</meta-name><meta-value>unlocked</meta-value></custom-meta><custom-meta xlink:type="simple"><meta-name>special-property</meta-name><meta-value>contains-inline-supplementary-material</meta-value></custom-meta></custom-meta-group></article-meta></front><body><sec id="s1" sec-type="intro"><title>Introduction</title><p>Radiation therapy (RT) and chemotherapy have traditionally focused on a cell-intrinsic mode of action such as genetic alteration of tumor cells (ie, DNA double-stranded breaks, DNA cross-linking, mitotic catastrophe, and other chromosome abnormalities) leading to cell cycle arrest and cell death. However, recent antitumor strategies have been increasingly focused on tumor cell-extrinsic factors such as induction of systemic antitumor immunity. Radiation-induced immunogenic cell death (ICD) results in stimulation of dendritic cells (DC),<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R1">1</xref> that efficiently engulf tumors and cross-presents tumor-associated antigens (TAAs) to T cells, eliciting an antitumor response<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R2">2</xref> capable of recognizing distant non-irradiated tumors, known as the abscopal effect.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R3 R4 R5">3–5</xref> Another important antitumor cell-extrinsic effect induced by RT is radiation-induced damage of the tumor vasculature.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R6 R7">6 7</xref> Tumor-associated endothelium is significantly altered in response to a single large dose of radiation (&lt;10 Gy), which in turn makes the tumor microenvironment (TME) hypoxic, acidic, and nutritionally deprived, thereby indirectly inducing tumor cell death.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R8 R9">8 9</xref> Because of the potential to damage the tumor-associated endothelium and induce ICD, combination treatment of RT together with immunotherapy and/or anti-angiogenic agents can often result in improved therapeutic efficacy.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10">10</xref></p><p>Active immunotherapies, such as cancer vaccines, aim to reprogram the patient’s immune system to recognize and eliminate its own cancer cells via recognition of TAAs.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11">11</xref> Immunological targeting of antigens expressed in the tumor-associated endothelial and/or stromal cells, rather than in the tumor cells themselves, is an alternative vaccination approach and has several advantages compared with targeting tumor-based TAAs and include reduced probability of tumor antigen escape variant generation due to the increased genetic stability of the tumor vasculature compared with tumor cells, and improved accessibility by immune cells.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R12">12</xref> In our previously published work,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref> we showed that prophylactic immunization with plasmid-DNA encoding the <italic toggle="yes">Tem1</italic> cDNA fused to the minimal domain of the C fragment of tetanus toxin (TT), used as an immunoenhancer,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R14 R15 R16">14–16</xref> resulted in complete tumor rejection. When used therapeutically, this approach reduced tumor progression in the CT26 colorectal and TC1 lung cancer models in a T cell-dependent manner. Immunization with the tumor endothelial marker 1 (TEM1) plasmid-DNA construct reduced tumor microvascular density (MVD), decreased tumor blood perfusion, increased hypoxia, and induced potent epitope spreading.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref></p><p>Despite showing encouraging results, therapeutic vaccination with the TEM1 plasmid-DNA did not however result in complete tumor regression. Several strategies to improve vaccination efficacy have been investigated.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R11 R17 R18">11 17 18</xref> Combinations of heterologous modalities of immunization (ie, vaccinating with different vectors encoding the same immunogen) have shown enhanced immune responses to the target antigen.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R19">19</xref> The rationale behind this strategy is that by using different vectors as boosters, it is possible to bypass the immune response elicited against the primer and also strengthen the immune response against the target antigen.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R19 R20 R21">19–21</xref></p><p>In the current study, we develop a novel recombinant Adenovirus 5 (Ad5) vaccine expressing TEM1-TT fusion protein (TEM1 Ad5) and demonstrate that heterologous priming with TEM1 plasmid-DNA vaccine followed by TEM1 Ad5 vaccine significantly improved TEM1-specific immune responses and antitumor effects compared with either vector alone.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R20 R22">20 22</xref> In vivo, dual treatment with RT and heterologous TEM1 vaccination disrupted the functional vasculature of the irradiated tumor, increased the systemic adaptive immune response, and significantly inhibited the growth of irradiated and non-irradiated (abscopal) tumor as compared with monotherapy. Characterization of the tumor stroma of treated animals reveals that RT promotes immune recognition of tumor-associated vasculature by anti-TEM1 T cells. Interestingly, blocking the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) interaction during dual therapy augmented epitope spreading toward the dominant gp70 viral-antigen while paradoxically reducing the frequency of vaccine-induced responses against self TEM1 antigen.</p></sec><sec id="s2" sec-type="results"><title>Results</title><sec id="s2-1"><title>TEM1 heterologous prime/boost vaccination increases antitumor effects</title><p>Despite the promising results achieved with the TEM1 plasmid-DNA,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref> we hypothesized we could further increase vaccination efficacy. DNA prime followed by boosting with viral vectors has been used to enhance immune responses against malaria,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R23">23</xref> viruses,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R24 R25">24 25</xref> and cancers.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R26 R27 R28 R29">26–29</xref> We and other have previously demonstrated that heterologous vaccination with plasmid-DNA followed by adenoviral vectors increase the magnitude of the immune response against the target antigen.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R19 R20 R22">19 20 22</xref> Therefore, we cloned the expression cassette of TEM1 (tem1 cDNA fused to TT) into a replication-deficient, human type 5 recombinant adenovirus (TEM1 Ad5) and tested the impact of vaccination using regimens consisting of: (1) three prime-boost injections with the TEM1 plasmid-DNA alone; or (2) three prime-boost injections with TEM1 Ad5 alone; (3) priming with the TEM1 plasmid-DNA followed by two boosts with TEM1 Ad5. Injections were given at weekly intervals and 1 week after the last immunization, splenocytes harvested from vaccinated mice were stimulated with a TEM1 peptide library composed of four peptide’s pools (A, B, C, and D) as previously described.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref> Heterologous prime/boost TEM1 immunization strongly enhanced the vaccine immune response against TEM1 peptides in BALB/c mice (pool A and pool C) and C57BL/6 mice (pool D) compared with vaccination with single vector, as measured by interferon-gamma (IFN-γ) ELISpot assay (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">figure 1A,B</xref>). Similarly, to what previously observed,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref> no reactivity against pools A, B, and C in C57BL6 or against pools B and D in BALB/c after both heterologous and homologous vaccination was observed (data not shown). Interestingly, heterologous TEM1 vaccination also induced a novel response in BALB/c mice directed against an immunogenic peptide (CYALFPRRRTFL; TEM1<sub>34-45</sub>) (<xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SP1">online supplemental figure S1A,B</xref>), in addition to previously identified peptides.<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref> We then performed a therapeutic vaccination to assess whether the enhanced immunogenicity would also result in improved antitumor effects. Accordingly, we challenged BALB/c mice with CT26 and began vaccination 5 days later. Mice receiving homologous vaccination (ie, TEM1 plasmid-DNA alone or TEM1 Ad5 alone) exhibited delayed tumor progression compared with the control group. Importantly, further reduction of tumor growth was observed in mice receiving heterologous vaccination compared with either single vector (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F1">figure 1C</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SP1">online supplemental figure S2</xref>). Since the heterologous prime/boost vaccination strategy resulted in enhanced immune responses and improved antitumor effects, we used this immunization protocol in all subsequent experiments.</p><supplementary-material id="SP1" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple"><object-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">SP1</object-id><object-id pub-id-type="doi">10.1136/jitc-2020-001636.supp1</object-id><label>Supplementary data</label><p><inline-supplementary-material id="SS1" xlink:href="jitc-2020-001636supp001.pdf" mime-subtype="pdf" mimetype="application" xlink:type="simple"/></p></supplementary-material><fig position="float" id="F1" orientation="portrait"><object-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">F1</object-id><label>Figure 1</label><caption><p>Tumor endothelial marker 1 (TEM1) heterologous prime/boost vaccination increases antitumor effect. BALB/c (A) and C57BL/6 (B) mice were vaccinated with: three prime/boost injections of TEM1 plasmid-DNA (plasmid), three prime/boost injections of TEM1 Ad5 (Ad5) and prime with TEM1 plasmid-DNA followed by two boosts of TEM1 Ad5 (plasmid+Ad5). Injections were given at weekly intervals and, 1 week after the last immunization, 1×10<sup>6</sup> splenocytes were stimulated overnight with the mouse TEM1 peptide library<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R13">13</xref> and tested by ELISpot. Only reactive pools are shown in the picture. Tukey’s multiple comparison tests were performed (BALB/c, Ad5 vs Plas+Ad5 p=0.025; Plas vs Plas+Ad5 p=0.0008; C57BL/6, Ad5 vs Plas+Ad5 p=0.008; Plas+Ad5 vs Plas p=0.01). (C) BALB/c mice were subcutaneously injected with CT26 cells in the lower back and immunization initiated 5 days after tumor inoculation, repeated at weekly intervals for 3 weeks. Tumor growth was monitored throughout the experiment. Differences in tumor volume were evaluated with two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) test (CTRL vs Plas or Ad5 or Plas+Ad5 p&lt;0.001; Plas vs Ad5 p=n.s.; Plas+Ad5 vs Ad5 p=0.0047; Plas+Ad5 vs Plas p&lt;0.001). Bar charts illustrate number of interferon-gamma spots. Means±SEM are shown from one representative experiment out of three. At least 3 mice/group for the vaccination experiment (A and B) and 7–9 mice/group for the tumor growth experiment (C) were used. *p&lt;0.05, **p&lt;0.01, ***p&lt;0.001, n.s. non-significant.</p></caption><graphic xlink:href="jitc-2020-001636f01" position="float" orientation="portrait" xlink:type="simple"/></fig></sec><sec id="s2-2"><title>Heterologous TEM1 vaccine and early RT results in augmented antitumor effects</title><p>Given the growing interest in combining radiotherapy and immunotherapy for the treatment of solid tumors,<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R10 R30 R31">10 30 31</xref> we investigated whether in vivo irradiation of TC1 and CT26 tumors can enhance the antitumor effects of heterologous TEM1 vaccination. We challenged BALB/c and C57BL/6 mice with CT26 and TC1 cells, respectively, and then performed RT (21 Gy single dose as previously performed in Uribe-Herranz <italic toggle="yes">et al</italic><xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R32">32</xref>) following either an <italic toggle="yes">early RT</italic> or <italic toggle="yes">late RT</italic> schedule (see the Materials and methods section). We performed TEM1 vaccination concurrently with RT, which consisted of priming with the TEM1 plasmid-DNA vaccine followed by RT and two boosts of the TEM1 Ad5 vaccine, repeated at weekly intervals. While TEM1 vaccination as monotherapy significantly reduced CT26 and TC1 tumor progression (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">figure 2A,C</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SP1">online supplemental figure S3A,B</xref>), RT monotherapy delayed tumor growth specifically when administered early (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">figure 2A,C</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SP1">online supplemental figure S3A,B</xref>), and not late in the treatment schedule (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">figure 2B,D</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SP1">online supplemental figure S3A,B</xref>). The heterologous TEM1 vaccine and an early RT schedule resulted in significantly improved antitumor effect in both CT26 and TC1 tumor models, compared with either RT or vaccination alone (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">figure 2A,C</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SP1">online supplemental figure S3A,B</xref>), whereas the TEM1 vaccine and a late RT schedule did not improve outcomes compared with TEM1 monotherapy (<xref ref-type="fig" rid="F2">figure 2B,D</xref> and <xref ref-type="supplementary-material" rid="SP1">online supplemental figure S3A,B</xref>). Since administering early RT with heterologous TEM1 vaccination demonstrated attenuated tumor progression, we adhered to the “Plasmid-RT-Ad5-Ad5” schedule throughout subsequent experiments.</p><fig position="float" id="F2" orientation="portrait"><object-id pub-id-type="publisher-id">F2</object-id><label>Figure 2</label><caption><p>Heterologous TEM1 vaccine and early RT results in augmented antitumor effects. BALB/c (A and B) and C57BL/6 (C and D) mice were subcutaneously injected with CT26 or TC1 cells in the lower back, respectively. Immunization was given 3–5 days after tumor challenge and continued at weekly intervals (±2 days). Tumor irradiation (21 Gy single dose<xref ref-type="bibr" rid="R32">32</xref>)) was performed at day 12 in CT26 (200–350 mm<sup>3</sup> tumor volume) or at day 10 in TC1 (100–250 mm<sup>3</sup> tumor volume) after tumor implantation (<italic toggle="yes">early RT</italic>) or alternatively on day 21 in CT26 (160