Effects of Arterial Stiffness on Cerebral WM Integrity in Older Adults: A Neurite Orientation Dispersion and Density Imaging and Magnetization Transfer Saturation Imaging Study ================================================================================================================================================================================ * J. Kikuta * K. Kamagata * M. Abe * C. Andica * Y. Saito * K. Takabayashi * W. Uchida * H. Naito * H. Tabata * A. Wada * Y. Tamura * R. Kawamori * H. Watada * S. Aoki ## Abstract **BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:** Arterial stiffness is reported to be able to cause axonal demyelination or degeneration. The present study aimed to use advanced MR imaging techniques to examine the effect of arterial stiffness on the WM microstructure among older adults. **MATERIALS AND METHODS:** Arterial stiffness was measured using the cardio-ankle vascular elasticity index (CAVI). The high-CAVI (mean CAVI ≥ 9 points) and the low-CAVI groups (mean CAVI < 9 points) were created. The neuronal fiber integrity of the WM was evaluated by neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging and magnetization transfer saturation imaging. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics and the tracts-of-interest analysis were performed. Specific WM regions (corpus callosum, internal capsule, anterior thalamic radiation, corona radiata, superior longitudinal fasciculus, forceps minor, and inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus) were selected in the tracts-of-interest analysis. **RESULTS:** In Tract-Based Spatial Statistics, the high-CAVI group showed a significantly lower myelin volume fraction value in the broad WM and significantly higher radial diffusivity and isotropic volume fraction values in the corpus callosum, forceps minor, inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus, internal capsule, corona radiata, and anterior thalamic radiation than the low-CAVI group. In tracts-of-interest analysis using multivariate linear regression, significant associations were found between the mean CAVI and radial diffusivity in the anterior thalamic radiation and the corona radiata; isotropic volume fraction in the anterior thalamic radiation and the corona radiata; and myelin volume fraction in the superior longitudinal fasciculus (*P *< .05). Additionally, partial correlation coefficients were observed for the significant associations of executive function with radial diffusivity and myelin volume fraction (*P *< .05). **CONCLUSIONS:** Arterial stiffness could be associated with demyelination rather than axonal degeneration. ## ABBREVIATIONS: ATR : anterior thalamic radiation CAVI : cardio-ankle vascular elasticity index CC : corpus callosum CR : corona radiata FA : fractional anisotropy FMi : forceps minor IC : internal capsule IFOF : inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus ISOVF : isotropic volume fraction NODDI : neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging MT : magnetization transfer MVF : myelin volume fraction RD : radial diffusivity SLF : superior longitudinal fasciculus TBSS : Tract-Based Spatial Statistics TMT : Trail-Making Test TOI : tracts of interest Arterial stiffness can be measured by several different methods. The pulse wave velocity has been measured by various methods as an indirect index of arterial elasticity, but it is blood pressure–dependent.1 Conversely, the cardio-ankle vascular elasticity index (CAVI) directly reflects vascular elasticity and is blood pressure–independent.2 Reports regarding the association between CAVI-measured arterial stiffness and WM microstructure have still not been published, though some studies reported the association between pulse wave velocity–measured arterial stiffness and brain WM integrity. Neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging (NODDI) is a new, advanced DWI technique that improves WM characterization using a multicompartment model to describe different WM functions. By enabling the estimation of neurite structure, NODDI can provide more specific insight into the underlying WM microstructural changes.3 Thus, NODDI could be useful in assessing arterial stiffness–associated WM microstructure, though no study has tested this hypothesis. Moreover, myelin-sensitive imaging using MR imaging can evaluate the WM microstructure from a different viewpoint from DWI. Arterial stiffness is indicated to cause axonal demyelination or degeneration.4,5 Notably, Badji et al6 showed that carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity is significantly associated with both fractional anisotropy (FA) and radial diffusivity (RD) but not with the myelin volume fraction (MVF). The results suggested that arterial stiffness is associated with axonal degeneration rather than with demyelination. However, reports supporting such results are still limited. We hypothesized that the impact of arterial stiffness on the brain WM microstructure could be better understood by using the above-mentioned multimodal WM-sensitive MR imaging techniques. Hence, this study aimed to explore the associations between CAVI-measured arterial stiffness and WM-sensitive MR imaging measures of the brain in older adults. ## MATERIALS AND METHODS The institutional review board of Juntendo University Hospital in Japan approved this study in compliance with the World Medical Association’s Code of Ethics (Declaration of Helsinki) for experiments involving humans. ### Study Participants The Bunkyo Health Study is a prospective cohort study of 1629 older individuals.7 Of these, 160 participants underwent both FLAIR imaging and DWI. Exclusion criteria included major psychiatric or neurologic disorders, heart failure, stroke, and/or a history of alcohol or drug abuse. Ultimately, 110 older participants were included for the analysis. Arteriosclerosis was estimated by CAVI determined by using an automatic waveform analyzer (Vascular Screening System VaSera VS1500; Fukuda Denshi).8 High CAVI (≥9.0) implies progression of carotid and coronary arteriosclerosis;9 thus, CAVI 9 was set as the cutoff value. The eligible participants were divided into the high-CAVI group (those with a mean [average of left and right values] CAVI of ≥ 9 points; 37 men and 23 women; mean age, 72.72 [SD, 5.00] years) and the low-CAVI group (those with a mean CAVI of < 9 points; 29 men and 21 women; mean age, 72.58 [SD, 4.82] years). Table 1 shows the demographic characteristics. Deep and subcortical WM hyperintensity and periventricular hyperintensity were evaluated using the Fazekas scale,10 according to axial FLAIR imaging. View this table: [Table 1:](http://www.ajnr.org/content/43/12/1706/T1) Table 1: Demographic characteristics of the participantsa ### Image Acquisition MR imaging data were acquired using a 3T MR imaging scanner (Magnetom Prisma; Siemens) with a 64-channel head coil. We acquired multishell DWI data using a spin-echo echo-planar imaging sequence, which included 2 b-values of 1000 and 2000 s/mm2 along 64 isotropic diffusion gradients uniformly distributed on a sphere, with a simultaneous multisection echo-planar imaging sequence in the anterior-posterior phase-encoding direction with the following parameters: TR = 3300 ms; TE = 70 ms; FOV = 229 × 229 mm; matrix size = 130 × 130; section thickness = 1.8 mm; resolution = 1.8 × 1.8 mm; acquisition time = 7 minutes and 29 seconds. DWI acquisition was completed with a *b* = 0 image. Standard and antiphase-encoded blipping images were acquired without diffusion weighting to compensate for the distortion caused by the magnetic susceptibility associated with the echo-planar imaging acquisition. The predominant T1-weighted, proton density–weighted, and magnetization transfer (MT)–weighted images were obtained using a 3D multiecho high-speed low-angle shot sequence for calculating the MT saturation index.11 The settings for the MT saturation sequences were as follows: for MToff and MTon scanning, TE = 2.53 ms, TR = 24 ms, flip angle = 5°; for T1WI, TE = 2.53 ms, TR = 10 ms, flip angle = 13°, with parallel imaging using generalized autocalibrating partially parallel acquisition with a factor of 2 in the phase-encoding direction, 7/8 partial Fourier acquisition in the partition direction, bandwidth = 260 Hz/pixel, matrix = 128 × 128, acquisition time = 6 minutes 25 seconds, section thickness = 1.8 mm, FOV = 224 × 224 mm. ### Diffusion MR Imaging Processing For eliminating artifacts, the eddy ([https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/eddy/UsersGuide](https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/eddy/UsersGuide)) and topup ([https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/topup](https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/topup)) toolboxes, which are part of the FSL ([www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl](http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl)), were used.12 The resulting images were fitted to the NODDI model3 using the NODDI Matlab Toolbox 5 ([http://www.nitrc.org/projects/noddi_toolbox](http://www.nitrc.org/projects/noddi_toolbox)). Table 2 summarizes the parameters of DTI and NODDI. The maps of the orientation dispersion index, isotropic volume fraction (ISOVF), and intracellular volume fraction were generated using the Accelerated Microstructure Imaging via Convex Optimization.13 Furthermore, the DTIFit tool ([https://open.win.ox.ac.uk/pages/fsl/fslpy/fsl.data.dtifit.html](https://open.win.ox.ac.uk/pages/fsl/fslpy/fsl.data.dtifit.html)) was used to generate tensor-derived maps according to the ordinary least-squares method14 using DWI data with b*-*values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2. View this table: [Table 2:](http://www.ajnr.org/content/43/12/1706/T2) Table 2: Summary of WM metrics ### Myelin-Sensitive Imaging Processing MT saturation (MTsat) data were analyzed using a Matlab script ([https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/run.html](https://www.mathworks.com/help/matlab/ref/run.html)).15 First, the apparent longitudinal relaxation rate (*R*1*app*) was calculated as the following equation: ![Formula][1] Here, *ST*1 and *SPD* indicate the signal strength of T1- and proton-density (PD)-weighted imaging, respectively. TR*T*1 and TR*PD* reflect the TRs of T1- and PD-weighted imaging, respectively. *αT*1 and *αPD* show the excitation flip angles of T1- and PD-weighted imaging. Second, the apparent signal amplitude (*Aapp*) was calculated as the following: ![Formula][2] Third, the apparent *δapp* was calculated as the following equation: ![Formula][3] TR*MT*, S*MT*, and α*MT* show the TR, signal intensity, and excitation flip angle of the MT-weighted imaging respectively. The following formula was applied to fix the small residual high-order dependency of MTsat on the local radiofrequency (RF) transmit field:16 ![Formula][4] *RF*local was calculated using the dual-angle method.17 In addition, we added 2 B1 maps with flip angles of 10° and 20°, respectively, obtained by echo-planar imaging in about 10 seconds. The first and second images were obtained after excitation with flip angles *α* and 2*α* proportional to sin*α* and sin 2*α*, respectively. The ratio of the 2 acquisitions was calculated using the following formula: ![Formula][5] From there, the local flip angle *α* was calculated. ### Tract-Based Spatial Statistics Analysis Voxelwise statistical analysis was performed using Tract-Based Spatial Statistics (TBSS; [http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TBSS](http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TBSS)) implemented in FSL.18 The TBSS procedure was as follows: First, using FMRIB’s Nonlinear Registration Tool (FNIRT; [http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FNIRT](http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/FNIRT)), we aligned the FA maps of all participants into the Montreal Neurological Institute 152 standard space with 1 × 1 × 1  mm³ voxel size. Second, we created and thinned a population-based mean FA image to establish the mean FA skeleton, which shows the centers of all tracts common to the group. The threshold of the mean FA skeleton was 0.2 to exclude the peripheral tracts and GM. Third, a binary mask of the FA skeletonized image was used as the mask image to make a voxel-by-voxel statistical comparison between the high- and low-CAVI groups of the 4D skeleton image file. This comparison was performed using FSL’s Randomise tool ([http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Randomise/UserGuide](http://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/Randomise/UserGuide)), and the number of permutations was set to 10,000. The data for other WM metrics was analyzed using the tbss\_non\_FA script ([https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TBSS/UserGuide#Using\_non-FA\_Images\_in\_TBSS](https://fsl.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/fsl/fslwiki/TBSS/UserGuide#Using\_non-FA_Images_in_TBSS)) to generate a 4D skeleton image file for each metric. ### Tract-of-Interest Analysis Tracts of interest (TOI) were analyzed using the ICBM DTI-81 Atlas ([http://www.bmap.ucla.edu/portfolio/atlases/ICBM\_DTI-81_Atlas/](http://www.bmap.ucla.edu/portfolio/atlases/ICBM_DTI-81_Atlas/)).19 According to the TBSS results (Figure) and previous studies showing arterial stiffness–associated WM regions, 6 major WM tracts, namely, the corpus callosum (CC), internal capsule (IC), corona radiata (CR), inferior fronto-occipital fasciculus (IFOF), forceps minor (FMi), and anterior thalamic radiation (ATR), were identified as TOI of RD and ISOVF. Additionally, 7 major WM tracts, namely, the CC, IC, CR, IFOF, FMi, ATR, and superior longitudinal fasciculus (SLF), were selected as TOI of the MVF. These WM regions are reportedly vulnerable to increased arterial stiffness.4,5,20,21 Then, the mean value (the average of left and right values) within each ROI was computed for each WM metric. ![FIGURE.](http://www.ajnr.org/https://www.highwirestage.com/content/ajnr/43/12/1706/F1.medium.gif) [FIGURE.](http://www.ajnr.org/content/43/12/1706/F1) FIGURE. Comparison between the high- and low-CAVI groups. For TBSS, the low- and high-CAVI groups were compared (family-wise error–corrected *P *< .05, adjusting for age, sex, antihypertensive therapy use, intracranial volume, and systolic blood pressure). *Red–yellow voxels* demonstrate significantly higher RD and ISOVF values in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group. *Blue–light blue voxels* illustrate a significantly lower MVF value in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group. ### Statistical Analysis All statistical data were analyzed using SPSS Statistics, Version 27 (IBM). Demographic and clinical data were analyzed using the χ2 or Mann-Whitney *U* test. A *P* value (2-tailed) < .05 was considered statistically significant. For TBSS, the high- and low-CAVI groups were compared using the Randomize tool (family-wise error–corrected *P *< .05, adjusting for age, sex, antihypertensive therapy use, systolic blood pressure, and intracranial volume). In all participants, we applied univariate linear regression analyses for each WM metric as a dependent variable and the mean CAVI as an independent variable. Subsequently, multivariate linear regression analyses were conducted using backward linear regression to identify independent factors associated with the mean CAVI. The variable *P *< .2 in the univariate model was included in the back-removal procedure with *P*-removal = .1. Age, sex, antihypertensive therapy, systolic blood pressure, and intracranial volume were considered confounding covariates to separate from the strength of the relation between the mean CAVI and WM integrity. Additionally, the partial correlation analyses between each WM metric and the cognitive performance scores were examined separately for all participants, the high-CAVI group, and the low-CAVI group, adjusting for age, sex, and education level. Multiple comparisons were corrected using the false discovery rate procedure for each WM metric and region.22 The false discovery rate–corrected *P *< .05 was considered significant. ## RESULTS ### Participant Characteristics Table 1 shows all participant characteristics. The high-CAVI group showed a significantly higher mean CAVI than the low-CAVI group. However, age, sex, education level, body mass index, heart rate, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and antihypertensive therapy history; the Mini-Mental State Examination; the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Japanese version); Trail Making Test (TMT) A, TMT B, TMT B minus A; deep and subcortical WM hyperintensity; and periventricular hyperintensity were not significantly different between the 2 groups. ### Whole-Brain Analysis TBSS results identified a significantly lower MVF in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group in the broad WM area (family-wise error–corrected *P *< .05; Figure). RD was significantly higher in the high-CAVI group in specific WM areas such as the CC, FMi, bilateral IFOF, bilateral ATR, bilateral CR, and left IC compared with the low-CAVI group. The ISOVF was significantly higher in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group in the CC, FMi, right IC, right CR, right ATR, and right IFOF. Most interesting, RD and ISOVF changes were relatively overlapped, mainly observed in the anterior area. Whereas FA, mean diffusivity, axial diffusivity, the orientation dispersion index, and intracellular volume fraction did not significantly differ between 2 groups. ### Tract-Specific Analysis The univariate linear regression analysis revealed the significant associations of the mean CAVI with RD in the FMi; ISOVF in the CC, CR, and FMi; and MVF in the CR, IC, FMi, IFOF, ATR, and SLF (false discovery rate–corrected *P *< .05; Table 3). In the multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, antihypertensive therapy, systolic blood pressure, and intracranial volume, the mean CAVI was significantly associated with RD and ISOVF in the ATR and CR, and the MVF in the SLF (false discovery rate–corrected *P *< .05; Table 3). View this table: [Table 3:](http://www.ajnr.org/content/43/12/1706/T3) Table 3: Univariate and multivariate linear regression analyses adjusted for age, sex, antihypertensive therapy, systolic blood pressure, and intracranial volume for the association of mean CAVI with WM metrics in specific regions In all participants, the partial correlation analyses demonstrated significant associations of TMT B with RD in the CR, FMi, and IC, or MVF in all tested WM regions (false discovery rate–corrected *P *< .05; Table 4). In the low-CAVI group, TMT B was significantly associated with RD in the FMi and MVF in the CR (false discovery rate–corrected *P* < .05; Table 4). Furthermore, the partial correlation coefficients for the significant associations of TMT B minus A with RD in the CR, IC, and FMi and with MVF in the ATR, CR, and FMi were noted in all participants (false discovery rate–corrected *P* < .05; Table 5). Meanwhile, the low-CAVI group had partial correlation coefficients for the significant associations of TMT B minus A with MVF in the CC, CR, FMi, IC, IFOF, and SLF (false discovery rate–corrected *P* < .05; Table 5). However, the partial correlation coefficients showed no significant associations among the Mini-Mental State Examination, the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (Japanese version), and TMT A and WM metrics. View this table: [Table 4:](http://www.ajnr.org/content/43/12/1706/T4) Table 4: Partial correlation coefficients between WM metrics and TMT B, adjusted for age, sex, and educationa View this table: [Table 5:](http://www.ajnr.org/content/43/12/1706/T5) Table 5: Partial correlation coefficients between WM metrics and TMT B minus A, **adjusted for age, sex, and education**a ## DISCUSSION The present study evaluated the WM microstructural changes in older adults with arterial stiffness. The major findings are as follows: First, whole-brain voxelwise results identified a significantly lower MVF in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group in the broad WM regions. TBSS results also showed significantly higher RD and ISOVF in the high-CAVI group than in the low-CAVI group in the CC, FMi, IFOF, IC, CR, and ATR. Second, the multivariate linear analysis noted significant associations of the mean CAVI with RD and ISOVF in the ATR and CR; and with MVF in the SLF. Finally, we found partial correlation coefficients for the significant associations between the executive function scores and RD and MVF in specific WM areas. Whole-brain voxelwise results revealed that the high-CAVI group had a significantly lower MVF value than the low-CAVI group in the broad WM area. Low MVF values indicate the loss of the myelin sheath insulating the nerves, implying WM demyelination.23 In this study, the high-CAVI group also had higher RD and ISOVF values than the low-CAVI group. High ISOVF values associated with high CAVI suggest increased extracellular water diffusion and have been shown to be related to increased inflammatory activation or blood-brain barrier permeability.24 Moreover, elevated RD is also associated with demyelination.25 From these results, the WM in the high-CAVI group could involve demyelination more than in the low-CAVI group. Furthermore, there were no significant differences in the degree of WM hyperintensities between the high- and low-CAVI groups in this study. Considering that TBSS showed significant differences in RD, ISOVF, and MVF between the two groups, our results suggest that WM microstructural changes precede WM hyperintensities and brain atrophy. In support of our findings, prior studies have indicated that DTI metrics capture ultrastructural changes in WM before the onset of WM hyperintensities and brain atrophy.26,27 Therefore, it is thought that there was no correlation between the degree of WM hyperintensities and WM metrics. In the multivariate linear analyses, the mean CAVI was significantly associated with RD in the ATR, CR, and FMi; ISOVF in the ATR and CR; and MVF in the SLF. These findings could reflect arteriosclerosis relating to demyelination. In previous studies, the WM microstructure has been reported to be vulnerable to circulatory alterations and correlates with arterial stiffness.4⇓-6,20 Notably, Badji et al6 showed that carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity was significantly associated with both FA and RD but not with MVF.17 The present study indicated the significant associations between the mean CAVI and not only DTI and NODDI metrics but also MVF, possibly reflecting the progression of arteriosclerosis exacerbating demyelination. The conflicting results regarding MVF between this study and that of Badji et al might be caused by differences in the characteristics of the target cohort. For instance, in our study, the average value of the body mass index (22.54 [SD, 2.84] kg/m2) in all participants was lower than that in the study of Badji et al (26.1 ([SD, 4.23] kg/m2). However, the average value of systolic blood pressure (137.47 [SD, 15.67] mm Hg) in our study was higher than that in the study of Badji et al (125.66 [SD, 11.65] mm Hg). Suzuki et al24 showed that pathologic processes related to hypertension are associated with image differences, suggesting changes in WM axons. In addition, WM integrity is particularly vulnerable to obesity.28 A higher body mass index is associated with lower FA in the FMi and CC.29 Therefore, except for the degree of arterial stiffness, the difference in participants’ physical characteristics may influence WM integrity. However, exact matching of these clinical findings is difficult. Additionally, our participants were all Japanese, whereas the participants of Badji et al were all Canadian; thus, racial differences may affect WM integrity.30 The present study also showed the existence of the partial correlation coefficients for the significant associations between the executive function and WM metrics. In all participants and the low-CAVI group, the MVF in several WM areas was negatively associated with the executive function. These findings suggest that executive dysfunction may be associated with demyelination. However, in the high-CAVI group of the study, there was no significant connection between WM metrics and TMT scores, which are measures of executive function. Furthermore, although there was no difference in the TMT scores between the high- and low-CAVI groups, we found significant differences in WM metrics between two groups. The findings imply that WM microstructural changes may have already occurred before the impairment of executive function. This study has some limitations. First, it is based on data obtained from Japanese individuals living in the city; hence, bias in genetic factors and environmental factors, such as eating habits, may occur. Second, it was conducted in a single facility. Thus, multicenter and epidemiologic studies are needed to examine further these investigations. ## CONCLUSIONS Arterial stiffness could be strongly associated with demyelination rather than axonal degeneration. ## Footnotes * J. Kikuta and K. Kamagata contributed equally to this work. * This work is supported by the Strategic Research Foundation at Private Universities (S1411006) and KAKENHI (18H03184, 18H02772, and 20K16737) from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. * [Disclosure forms](http://www.ajnr.org/sites/default/files/additional-assets/Disclosures/December%202022/0588.pdf) provided by the authors are available with the full text and PDF of this article at [www.ajnr.org](http://www.ajnr.org). Indicates open access to non-subscribers at [www.ajnr.org](http://www.ajnr.org) ## References 1. 1.Lim J, Pearman M, Park W, et al. Interrelationships among various measures of central artery stiffness. Am J Hypertens 2016;29:1024–28 doi:10.1093/ajh/hpw045 pmid:27143395 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1093/ajh/hpw045&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=27143395&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 2. 2.Matsushita K, Ding N, Kim ED, et al. Cardio-ankle vascular index and cardiovascular disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective and cross-sectional studies. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2019;21:16–24 doi:10.1111/jch.13425 pmid:30456903 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/jch.13425&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30456903&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 3. 3.Zhang H, Schneider T, Wheeler-Kingshott CA, et al. NODDI: practical in vivo neurite orientation dispersion and density imaging of the human brain. NeuroImage 2012;61:1000–16 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072 pmid:22484410 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.03.072&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=22484410&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 4. 4.Maillard P, Mitchell GF, Himali JJ, et al. Aortic stiffness, increased white matter free water, and altered microstructural integrity: a continuum of injury. Stroke 2017;48:1567–73 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.016321 pmid:28473633 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToic3Ryb2tlYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjQ4LzYvMTU2NyI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIxOiIvYWpuci80My8xMi8xNzA2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 5. 5.Tarumi T, de Jong DL, Zhu DC, et al. Central artery stiffness, baroreflex sensitivity, and brain white matter neuronal fiber integrity in older adults. Neuroimage 2015;110:162–70 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.041 pmid:25623500 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.041&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25623500&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 6. 6.Badji A, Noriega de la Colina A, Karakuzu A, et al. Arterial stiffness and white matter integrity in the elderly: a diffusion tensor and magnetization transfer imaging study. Neuroimage 2019;186:577–85 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.015 pmid:30448213 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.11.015&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=30448213&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 7. 7.Someya Y, Tamura Y, Kaga H, et al. Skeletal muscle function and need for long-term care of urban elderly people in Japan (the Bunkyo Health Study): a prospective cohort study. BMJ Open 2019;9:e031584 doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031584 pmid:31530621 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NzoiYm1qb3BlbiI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czoxMToiOS85L2UwMzE1ODQiO3M6NDoiYXRvbSI7czoyMToiL2FqbnIvNDMvMTIvMTcwNi5hdG9tIjt9czo4OiJmcmFnbWVudCI7czowOiIiO30=) 8. 8.Shirai K, Utino J, Otsuka K, et al. A novel blood pressure-independent arterial wall stiffness parameter: cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI). J Atheroscler Thromb 2006;13:101–07 doi:10.5551/jat.13.101 pmid:16733298 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.5551/jat.13.101&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16733298&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000237130000005&link_type=ISI) 9. 9.Izuhara M, Shioji K, Kadota S, et al. Relationship of cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) to carotid and coronary arteriosclerosis. Circ J 2008;72:1762–67 doi:10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0152 pmid:18802315 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1253/circj.CJ-08-0152&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18802315&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000260519900007&link_type=ISI) 10. 10.Fazekas F, Chawluk JB, Alavi A, et al. MR signal abnormalities at 1.5 T in Alzheimer’s dementia and normal aging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1987;149:351–56 doi:10.2214/ajr.149.2.351 pmid:3496763 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2214/ajr.149.2.351&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=3496763&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1987J254400029&link_type=ISI) 11. 11.Kamagata K, Zalesky A, Yokoyama K, et al. MR g-ratio-weighted connectome analysis in patients with multiple sclerosis. Sci Rep 2019;9:13522 doi:10.1038/s41598-019-50025-2 pmid:31534143 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1038/s41598-019-50025-2&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31534143&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 12. 12.Yamada H, Abe O, Shizukuishi T, et al. Efficacy of distortion correction on diffusion imaging: comparison of FSL Eddy and Eddy_Correct using 30 and 60 directions diffusion encoding. PLoS One 2014;9:e112411 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112411 pmid:25405472 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0112411&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25405472&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 13. 13.Daducci A, Canales-Rodríguez EJ, Zhang H, et al. Accelerated Microstructure Imaging via Convex Optimization (AMICO) from diffusion MRI data. Neuroimage 2015;105:32–44 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.026 pmid:25462697 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.10.026&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25462697&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 14. 14.Basser PJ, Mattiello J, LeBihan D. Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo. J Magn Reson B 1994;103:247–54 doi:10.1006/jmrb.1994.1037 pmid:8019776 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1006/jmrb.1994.1037&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=8019776&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1994ND15700006&link_type=ISI) 15. 15.Helms G, Dathe H, Kallenberg K, et al. High-resolution maps of magnetization transfer with inherent correction for RF inhomogeneity and T1 relaxation obtained from 3D FLASH MRI. Magn Reson Med 2008;60:1396–407 doi:10.1002/mrm.21732 pmid:19025906 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1002/mrm.21732&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=19025906&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000261225100016&link_type=ISI) 16. 16.Weiskopf N, Suckling J, Williams G, et al. Quantitative multi-parameter mapping of R1, PD*, MT, and R2* at 3T: a multi-center validation. Front Neurosci 2013;7:95 doi:10.3389/fnins.2013.00095 pmid:23772204 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnins.2013.00095&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=23772204&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 17. 17.Morrell GR, Schabel MC. An analysis of the accuracy of magnetic resonance flip angle measurement methods. Phys Med Biol 2010;55:6157–74 doi:10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/008 pmid:20876970 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1088/0031-9155/55/20/008&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=20876970&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 18. 18.Smith SM, Jenkinson M, Johansen-Berg H, et al. Tract-Based Spatial Statistics: voxelwise analysis of multi-subject diffusion data. Neuroimage 2006;31:1487–505 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 pmid:16624579 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=16624579&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000238704700009&link_type=ISI) 19. 19.Mori S, Oishi K, Jiang H, et al. Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. Neuroimage 2008;40:570–82 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.035 pmid:18255316 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.035&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=18255316&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000254627700019&link_type=ISI) 20. 20.Maillard P, Mitchell GF, Himali JJ, et al. Effects of arterial stiffness on brain integrity in young adults from the Framingham heart study. Stroke 2016;47:1030–36 doi:10.1161/STROKEAHA.116.012949 pmid:26965846 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6OToic3Ryb2tlYWhhIjtzOjU6InJlc2lkIjtzOjk6IjQ3LzQvMTAzMCI7czo0OiJhdG9tIjtzOjIxOiIvYWpuci80My8xMi8xNzA2LmF0b20iO31zOjg6ImZyYWdtZW50IjtzOjA6IiI7fQ==) 21. 21.Tamura Y, Shimoji K, Ishikawa J, et al. Subclinical atherosclerosis, vascular risk factors, and white matter alterations in diffusion tensor imaging findings of older adults with cardiometabolic diseases. Front Aging Neurosci 2021;13:712385 doi:10.3389/fnagi.2021.712385 pmid:34489681 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3389/fnagi.2021.712385&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=34489681&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 22. 22.Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Methodological) 1995;57:289–300 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2307/2346101&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=WOS:A1995QE4&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=A1995QE45300017&link_type=ISI) 23. 23.Duval T, Stikov N, Cohen-Adad J. Modeling white matter microstructure. Funct Neurol 2016;31:217–28 doi:10.11138/fneur/2016.31.4.217 pmid:28072382 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.11138/fneur/2016.31.4.217&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=28072382&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 24. 24.Suzuki H, Gao H, Bai W, et al. Abnormal brain white matter microstructure is associated with both pre-hypertension and hypertension. PLoS One 2017;12:e0187600 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0187600 pmid:29145428 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0187600&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=29145428&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 25. 25.Song SK, Yoshino J, Le TQ, et al. Demyelination increases radial diffusivity in corpus callosum of mouse brain. Neuroimage 2005;26:132–40 doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.028 pmid:15862213 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.01.028&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=15862213&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) [Web of Science](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=000228915800015&link_type=ISI) 26. 26.Andica C, Kamagata K, Hatano T, et al. Free-water imaging in white and gray matter in Parkinson’s disease. Cells 2019;8:839 doi:10.3390/cells8080839 pmid:31387313 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.3390/cells8080839&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=31387313&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 27. 27.Maillard P, Carmichael O, Harvey D, et al. FLAIR and diffusion MRI signals are independent predictors of white matter hyperintensities. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2013;34:54–61 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A3146 pmid:22700749 [Abstract/FREE Full Text](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/ijlink/YTozOntzOjQ6InBhdGgiO3M6MTQ6Ii9sb29rdXAvaWpsaW5rIjtzOjU6InF1ZXJ5IjthOjQ6e3M6ODoibGlua1R5cGUiO3M6NDoiQUJTVCI7czoxMToiam91cm5hbENvZGUiO3M6NDoiYWpuciI7czo1OiJyZXNpZCI7czo3OiIzNC8xLzU0IjtzOjQ6ImF0b20iO3M6MjE6Ii9ham5yLzQzLzEyLzE3MDYuYXRvbSI7fXM6ODoiZnJhZ21lbnQiO3M6MDoiIjt9) 28. 28.Bettcher BM, Walsh CM, Watson C, et al. Body mass and white matter integrity: the influence of vascular and inflammatory markers. PLoS One 2013;8:e77741 doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0077741 pmid:24147070 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1371/journal.pone.0077741&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=24147070&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 29. 29.Kullmann S, Schweizer F, Veit R, et al. Compromised white matter integrity in obesity. Obes Rev 2015;16:273–81 doi:10.1111/obr.12248 pmid:25676886 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.1111/obr.12248&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25676886&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) 30. 30.Liu G, Allen B, Lopez O, et al. Racial differences in gray matter integrity by diffusion tensor in black and white octogenarians. Curr Alzheimer Res 2015;12:648–54 doi:10.2174/1567205011666141107153634 pmid:25387332 [CrossRef](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=10.2174/1567205011666141107153634&link_type=DOI) [PubMed](http://www.ajnr.org/lookup/external-ref?access_num=25387332&link_type=MED&atom=%2Fajnr%2F43%2F12%2F1706.atom) * Received July 12, 2022. * Accepted after revision October 15, 2022. * © 2022 by American Journal of Neuroradiology [1]: /embed/mml-math-1.gif [2]: /embed/mml-math-2.gif [3]: /embed/mml-math-3.gif [4]: /embed/mml-math-4.gif [5]: /embed/mml-math-5.gif