Natural History of Endoscopic Third Ventriculostomy in Adults: Serial Evaluation with High-Resolution CISS

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Di Rocco C,
   3. Massimi L,
   4. Tamburrini G

   . Shunts vs endoscopic third ventriculostomy in infants: are there different types and/or rates of complications? A review. Childs Nerv Syst 2006 22:1573–89 pmid:17053941

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Santamarta D,
   3. Martin-Vallejo J,
   4. Díaz-Alvarez A, et al

   . Changes in ventricular size after endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2008;150:119–27; discussion 127 doi:10.1007/s00701-007-1477-6 pmid:18176776

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. van Beijnum J,
   3. Hanlo PW,
   4. Fischer K, et al

   . Laser-assisted endoscopic third ventriculostomy: long-term results in a series of 202 patients. Neurosurgery 2008;62:437–43; discussion 443–44 doi:10.1227/01.neu.0000316011.13174.b1 pmid:18382322

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Yadav YR,
   3. Parihar V,
   4. Pande S, et al

   . Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosci Rural Pract 2012;3:163–73 doi:10.4103/0976-3147.98222 pmid:22865970

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Anık I,
   3. Ceylan S,
   4. Koc K, et al

   . Membranous structures affecting the success of endoscopic third ventriculostomy in adult aqueductus sylvii stenosis. Minim Invasive Neurosurg 2011;54:68–74 doi:10.1055/s-0031-1277172 pmid:21656441

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Antes S,
   3. Tschan CA,
   4. Oertel JM

   . An operative technique combining endoscopic third ventriculostomy and long-term ICP monitoring. Childs Nerv Syst 2014;30:331–35 doi:10.1007/s00381-013-2269-3 pmid:23989429

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Dinçer A,
   3. Yildiz E,
   4. Kohan S, et al

   . Analysis of endoscopic third ventriculostomy patency by MRI: value of different pulse sequences, the sequence parameters, and the imaging planes for investigation of flow void. Childs Nerv Syst 2011;27:127–35 doi:10.1007/s00381-010-1219-6 pmid:20632013

   CrossRefPubMed
8. 8.↵
   2. Feng HL,
   3. Huang GF,
   4. Liao XL, et al

   . Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of obstructive hydrocephalus: an outcome analysis. J Neurosurg 2004;100:626–33 doi:10.3171/jns.2004.100.4.0626 pmid:15070116

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. 9.↵
   2. Mobbs RJ,
   3. Vonau M,
   4. Davies MA

   . Death after late failure of an endoscopic third ventriculostomy: a potential solution. Neurosurgery 2003;53:384–85; discussion 385–86 doi:10.1227/01.NEU.0000073534.04767.B1 pmid:12925256

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Fukuhara T,
    3. Luciano MG,
    4. Kowalski RJ

    . Clinical features of third ventriculostomy failures classified by fenestration patency. Surg Neurol 2002;58:102–10 doi:10.1016/S0090-3019(02)00773-5 pmid:12453645

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Goodwin CR,
    3. Sankey EW,
    4. Jusue-Torres I, et al

    . The use of an aspirating/resecting device to reduce stoma closure following endoscopic third ventriculostomy for aqueductal stenosis. Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown) 2015;11:512–17 doi:10.1227/NEU.0000000000000920 pmid:29506164

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Bargalló N,
    3. Olondo L,
    4. Garcia AI, et al

    . Functional analysis of third ventriculostomy patency by quantification of CSF stroke volume by using cine phase-contrast MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:2514–21 pmid:16286393

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    2. Dlouhy BJ,
    3. Capuano AW,
    4. Madhavan K, et al

    . Preoperative third ventricular bowing as a predictor of endoscopic third ventriculostomy success. J Neurosurg Pediatr 2012;9:182–90 doi:10.3171/2011.11.PEDS11495 pmid:22295925

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Jallo GI,
    3. Kothbauer KF,
    4. Abbott IR

    . Endoscopic third ventriculostomy. Neurosurg Focus 2005;19:E11

    PubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Fischbein NJ,
    3. Ciricillo SF,
    4. Barr RM, et al

    . Endoscopic third ventriculocisternostomy: MR assessment of patency with 2-D cine phase-contrast versus T2-weighted fast spin echo technique. Pediatr Neurosurg 1998;28:70–78 doi:10.1159/000028624 pmid:9693335

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    2. Hoffmann KT,
    3. Lehmann TN,
    4. Baumann C, et al

    . CSF flow imaging in the management of third ventriculostomy with a reversed fast imaging with steady-state precession sequence. Eur Radiol 2003;13:1432–37 pmid:12764663

    PubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Kulkarni AV,
    3. Drake JM,
    4. Armstrong DC, et al

    . Imaging correlates of successful endoscopic third ventriculostomy. J Neurosurg 2000;92:915–19 doi:10.3171/jns.2000.92.6.0915 pmid:10839249

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. 18.↵
    2. Sankey EW,
    3. Elder BD,
    4. Liu A, et al

    . Predictors of admission and shunt revision during emergency department visits for shunt-treated adult patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension. J Neurosurg 2017;127:233–39 doi:10.3171/2016.5.JNS151303 pmid:27662535

    CrossRefPubMed
19. 19.↵
    2. Balevi M

    . Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in normal pressure hydrocephalus and symptomatic long-standing overt ventriculomegaly. Asian J Neurosurg 2017;12:605–12 doi:10.4103/ajns.AJNS_54_15 pmid:29114272

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Gangemi M,
    3. Maiuri F,
    4. Naddeo M, et al

    . Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: an Italian multicenter study. Neurosurgery 2008;63:62–67; discussion 67–69 pmid:18728569

    PubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Hailong F,
    3. Guangfu H,
    4. Haibin T, et al

    . Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in the management of communicating hydrocephalus: a preliminary study. J Neurosurg 2008;109:923–30 doi:10.3171/JNS/2008/109/11/0923 pmid:18976086

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Kiefer M,
    3. Eymann R,
    4. Steudel WI

    . LOVA hydrocephalus: a new entity of chronic hydrocephalus [in German]. Nervenarzt 2002;73:972–81 doi:10.1007/s00115-002-1389-x pmid:12376886

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Grand W,
    3. Leonardo J,
    4. Chamczuk AJ, et al

    . Endoscopic third ventriculostomy in 250 adults with hydrocephalus: patient selection, outcomes, and complications. Neurosurgery 2016;78:109–19