Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Head and Neck: Influence of Fat-Suppression Technique and Multishot 2D Navigated Interleaved Acquisitions

References

1. 1.↵
   2. Le Bihan D,
   3. Breton E,
   4. Lallemand D, et al

   . Separation of diffusion and perfusion in intravoxel incoherent motion MR imaging. Radiology 1988;168:497–505 doi:10.1148/radiology.168.2.3393671 pmid:3393671

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   2. Vandecaveye V,
   3. De Keyzer F,
   4. Vander Poorten V, et al

   . Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: value of diffusion-weighted MR imaging for nodal staging. Radiology 2009;251:134–46 doi:10.1148/radiol.2511080128 pmid:19251938

   CrossRefPubMed
3. 3.↵
   2. Herneth AM,
   3. Guccione S,
   4. Bednarski M

   . Apparent diffusion coefficient: a quantitative parameter for in vivo tumor characterization. Eur J Radiol 2003;45:208–13 doi:10.1016/S0720-048X(02)00310-8 pmid:12595105

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   2. Maehara M,
   3. Ikeda K,
   4. Kurokawa H, et al

   . Diffusion-weighted echo-planar imaging of the head and neck using 3-T MRI: investigation into the usefulness of liquid perfluorocarbon pads and choice of optimal fat suppression method. Magn Reson Imaging 2014;32:440–45 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2014.01.011 pmid:24582547

   CrossRefPubMed
5. 5.↵
   2. Zhao M,
   3. Liu Z,
   4. Sha Y, et al

   . Readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the evaluation of sinonasal lesions: a comprehensive comparison of image quality in single-shot echo-planar imaging. Magn Reson Imaging 2016;34:166–72 doi:10.1016/j.mri.2015.10.010 pmid:26541548

   CrossRefPubMed
6. 6.↵
   2. Thoeny HC,
   3. De Keyzer F,
   4. King AD

   . Diffusion-weighted MR imaging in the head and neck. Radiology 2012;263:19–32 doi:10.1148/radiol.11101821 pmid:22438440

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   2. Srinivasan A,
   3. Dvorak R,
   4. Perni K, et al

   . Differentiation of benign and malignant pathology in the head and neck using 3T apparent diffusion coefficient values: early experience. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:40–44 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0743 pmid:17921228

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   2. Abdel Razek AA,
   3. Kandeel AY,
   4. Soliman N, et al

   . Role of diffusion-weighted echo-planar MR imaging in differentiation of residual or recurrent head and neck tumors and posttreatment changes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2007;28:1146–52 doi:10.3174/ajnr.A0491 pmid:17569975

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   2. Woodhams R,
   3. Ramadan S,
   4. Stanwell P, et al

   . Diffusion-weighted imaging of the breast: principles and clinical applications. Radiographics 2011;31:1059–84 doi:10.1148/rg.314105160 pmid:21768239

   CrossRefPubMed
10. 10.↵
    2. Mürtz P,
    3. Tsesarskiy M,
    4. Kowal A, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging of breast lesions: the influence of different fat-suppression techniques on quantitative measurements and their reproducibility. Eur Radiol 2014;24:2540–51 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3235-5 pmid:24898097

    CrossRefPubMed
11. 11.↵
    2. Brandão S,
    3. Nogueira L,
    4. Matos E, et al

    . Fat suppression techniques (STIR vs. SPAIR) on diffusion-weighted imaging of breast lesions at 3.0 T: preliminary experience. Radiol Med 2015;120:705–13 doi:10.1007/s11547-015-0508-2 pmid:25665796

    CrossRefPubMed
12. 12.↵
    2. Baron P,
    3. Dorrius MD,
    4. Kappert P, et al

    . Diffusion-weighted imaging of normal fibroglandular breast tissue: influence of microperfusion and fat suppression technique on the apparent diffusion coefficient. NMR Biomed 2010;23:399–405 doi:10.1002/nbm.1475 pmid:20131313

    CrossRefPubMed
13. 13.↵
    2. Wenkel E,
    3. Geppert C,
    4. Schulz-Wendtland R, et al

    . Diffusion weighted imaging in breast MRI: comparison of two different pulse sequences. Acad Radiol 2007;14:1077–83 doi:10.1016/j.acra.2007.06.006 pmid:17707315

    CrossRefPubMed
14. 14.↵
    2. Porter DA,
    3. Heidemann RM

    . High resolution diffusion-weighted imaging using readout-segmented echo-planar imaging, parallel imaging and a two-dimensional navigator-based reacquisition. Magn Reson Med 2009;62:468–75 doi:10.1002/mrm.22024 pmid:19449372

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    2. Jeong HK,
    3. Dewey BE,
    4. Hirtle JA, et al

    . Improved diffusion tensor imaging of the optic nerve using multishot two-dimensional navigated acquisitions. Magn Reson Med 2015;74:953–63 doi:10.1002/mrm.25469 pmid:25263603

    CrossRefPubMed
16. 16.↵
    2. Jeong HK,
    3. Gore JC,
    4. Anderson AW

    . High-resolution human diffusion tensor imaging using 2-D navigated multishot SENSE EPI at 7 T. Magn Reson Med 2013;69:793–802 doi:10.1002/mrm.24320 pmid:22592941

    CrossRefPubMed
17. 17.↵
    2. Koyasu S,
    3. Iima M,
    4. Umeoka S, et al

    . The clinical utility of reduced-distortion readout-segmented echo-planar imaging in the head and neck region: initial experience. Eur Radiol 2014;24:3088–96 doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3369-5 pmid:25117744

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    2. Fleiss JL

    . Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions. 2nd ed. New York: John Wiley; 1981
19. 19.↵
    2. Kazama T,
    3. Nasu K,
    4. Kuroki Y, et al

    . Comparison of diffusion-weighted images using short inversion time inversion recovery or chemical shift selective pulse as fat suppression in patients with breast cancer. Jpn J Radiol 2009;27:163–67 doi:10.1007/s11604-009-0314-7 pmid:19499306

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    2. Koç O,
    3. Paksoy Y,
    4. Erayman I, et al

    . Role of diffusion weighted MR in the discrimination diagnosis of the cystic and/or necrotic head and neck lesions. Eur J Radiol 2007;62:205–13 doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.11.030 pmid:17188444

    CrossRefPubMed
21. 21.↵
    2. Nakatsu M,
    3. Hatabu H,
    4. Itoh H, et al

    . Comparison of short inversion time inversion recovery (STIR) and fat-saturated (chemsat) techniques for background fat intensity suppression in cervical and thoracic MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2000;11:56–60 pmid:10676621

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    2. Deng J,
    3. Miller FH,
    4. Salem R, et al

    . Multishot diffusion-weighted PROPELLER magnetic resonance imaging of the abdomen. Invest Radiol 2006;41:769–75 doi:10.1097/01.rli.0000236808.84746.95 pmid:16971801

    CrossRefPubMed
23. 23.↵
    2. Brihuega-Moreno O,
    3. Heese FP,
    4. Tejos C, et al

    . Effects of, and corrections for, cross-term interactions in Q-space MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:1048–54 doi:10.1002/mrm.20044 pmid:15122689

    CrossRefPubMed