Feasibility of Flat Panel Angiographic CT after Intravenous Contrast Agent Application in the Postoperative Evaluation of Patients with Clipped Aneurysms

References

1. 1.↵
   1. Macdonald RL,
   2. Wallace MC,
   3. Kestle JR

   . Role of angiography following aneurysm surgery. J Neurosurg 1993;79:826–32

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. 2.↵
   1. Kivisaari RP,
   2. Porras M,
   3. Ohman J,
   4. et al

   . Routine cerebral angiography after surgery for saccular aneurysms: is it worth it? Neurosurgery 2004;55:1015–24

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. 3.↵
   1. Le Roux PD,
   2. Elliott JP,
   3. Eskridge JM,
   4. et al

   . Risks and benefits of diagnostic angiography after aneurysm surgery: a retrospective analysis of 597 studies. Neurosurgery 1998;42:1248–54, discussion 1254–55

   CrossRefPubMed
4. 4.↵
   1. Klopfenstein JD,
   2. Spetzler RF,
   3. Kim LJ,
   4. et al

   . Comparison of routine and selective use of intraoperative angiography during aneurysm surgery: a prospective assessment. J Neurosurg 2004;100:230–35

   PubMed
5. 5.↵
   1. Acevedo JC,
   2. Turjman F,
   3. Sindou M

   . Postoperative arteriography in surgery for intracranial aneurysm: prospective study in a consecutive series of 267 operated aneurysms [in French]. Neurochirurgie 1997;43:275–84

   PubMed
6. 6.↵
   1. Murphy M,
   2. Bell D,
   3. Worth RD,
   4. et al

   . Angiography postclipping and coiling of cerebral aneurysms. Br J Neurosurg 2005;19:225–28

   CrossRefPubMed
7. 7.↵
   1. Wermer MJ,
   2. van der Schaaf IC,
   3. Velthuis BK,
   4. et al

   . Follow-up screening after subarachnoid haemorrhage: frequency and determinants of new aneurysms and enlargement of existing aneurysms. Brain 2005;128(pt 10):2421–29. Epub 2005 Jul 6

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. 8.↵
   1. van der Schaaf IC,
   2. Velthuis BK,
   3. Wermer MJ,
   4. et al

   . New detected aneurysms on follow-up screening in patients with previously clipped intracranial aneurysms: comparison with DSA or CTA at the time of SAH. Stroke 2005;36:1753–58

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
9. 9.↵
   1. Tsutsumi K,
   2. Ueki K,
   3. Morita A,
   4. et al

   . Risk of aneurysm recurrence in patients with clipped cerebral aneurysms: results of long-term follow-up angiography. Stroke 2001;32:1191–94

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
10. 10.↵
    1. Wintermark M,
    2. Uske A,
    3. Chalaron M,
    4. et al

    . Multislice computerized tomography angiography in the evaluation of intracranial aneurysms: a comparison with intraarterial digital subtraction angiography. J Neurosurg 2003;98:828–36

    PubMedWeb of Science
11. 11.↵
    1. Watanabe Y,
    2. Kashiwagi N,
    3. Yamada N,
    4. et al

    . Subtraction 3D CT angiography with the orbital synchronized helical scan technique for the evaluation of postoperative cerebral aneurysms treated with cobalt-alloy clips. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1071–75

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
12. 12.↵
    1. Sakamoto S,
    2. Kiura Y,
    3. Shibukawa M,
    4. et al

    . Subtracted 3D CT angiography for evaluation of internal carotid artery aneurysms: comparison with conventional digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:1332–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. 13.↵
    1. Willinsky RA,
    2. Taylor SM,
    3. TerBrugge K,
    4. et al

    . Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography: prospective analysis of 2,899 procedures and review of the literature. Radiology 2003;227:522–28

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
14. 14.↵
    1. Gonner F,
    2. Lovblad KO,
    3. Heid O,
    4. et al

    . Magnetic resonance angiography with ultrashort echo times reduces the artefact of aneurysm clips. Neuroradiology 2002;44:755–58. Epub 2002 Aug 14

    CrossRefPubMed
15. 15.↵
    1. Sagara Y,
    2. Kiyosue H,
    3. Hori Y,
    4. et al

    . Limitations of three-dimensional reconstructed computerized tomography angiography after clip placement for intracranial aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2005;103:656–61

    PubMedWeb of Science
16. 16.↵
    1. Dehdashti AR,
    2. Binaghi S,
    3. Uske A,
    4. et al

    . Comparison of multislice computerized tomography angiography and digital subtraction angiography in the postoperative evaluation of patients with clipped aneurysms. J Neurosurg 2006;104:395–403

    PubMedWeb of Science
17. 17.↵
    1. Pechlivanis I,
    2. Konig M,
    3. Engelhardt M,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of clip artifacts in three-dimensional computed tomography. Cen Eur Neurosurg 2009;70:9–14

    CrossRefPubMed
18. 18.↵
    1. Lee JH,
    2. Kim SJ,
    3. Cha J,
    4. et al

    . Postoperative multidetector computed tomography angiography after aneurysm clipping: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2005;29:20–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
19. 19.↵
    1. Gerardin E,
    2. Tollard E,
    3. Derrey S,
    4. et al

    . Usefulness of multislice computerized tomographic angiography in the postoperative evaluation of patients with clipped aneurysms. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 2010;152:793–802

    CrossRefPubMed
20. 20.↵
    1. Buhk JH,
    2. Lingor P,
    3. Knauth M

    . Angiographic CT with intravenous administration of contrast medium is a noninvasive option for follow-up after intracranial stenting. Neuroradiology 2008;50:349–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
21. 21.↵
    1. Kalender WA,
    2. Kyriakou Y

    . Flat-detector computed tomography (FD-CT). Eur Radiol 2007;17:2767–79

    CrossRefPubMed
22. 22.↵
    1. Psychogios MN,
    2. Buhk JH,
    3. Schramm P,
    4. et al

    . Feasibility of angiographic CT in peri-interventional diagnostic imaging: a comparative study with multidetector CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1226–31. Epub 2010 Apr 1

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
23. 23.↵
    1. Psychogios MN,
    2. Schramm P,
    3. Buhk JH,
    4. et al

    . Angiographic CT after intravenous contrast agent application: a noninvasive follow-up tool after intracranial angioplasty and stenting. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:1886–91. Epub 2010 Jul 15

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
24. 24.↵
    1. Buhk JH,
    2. Kallenberg K,
    3. Mohr A,
    4. et al

    . Evaluation of angiographic computed tomography in the follow-up after endovascular treatment of cerebral aneurysms: a comparative study with DSA and TOF-MRA. Eur Radiol 2009;19:430–36

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
25. 25.↵
    1. Aadland TD,
    2. Thielen KR,
    3. Kaufmann TJ,
    4. et al

    . 3D C-arm conebeam CT angiography as an adjunct in the precise anatomic characterization of spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:476–80. Epub 2009 Oct 22

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. 26.↵
    1. Wachter D,
    2. Psychogios M,
    3. Knauth M,
    4. et al

    . IvACT after aneurysm clipping as an alternative to digital subtraction angiography: first experiences. Cen Eur Neurosurg 2010;71:121–25

    CrossRefPubMed
27. 27.↵
    1. Kyriakou Y,
    2. Struffert T,
    3. Dorfler A,
    4. et al

    . Basic principles of flat detector computed tomography (FD-CT) [in German]. Radiologe 2009;49:811–19

    CrossRefPubMed
28. 28.↵
    1. Prell D,
    2. Kyriakou Y,
    3. Kalender WA

    . Comparison of ring artifact correction methods for flat-detector CT. Phys Med Biol 2009;54:3881–95

    CrossRefPubMed
29. 29.↵
    1. Johnston SC,
    2. Dowd CF,
    3. Higashida RT,
    4. et al

    . Predictors of rehemorrhage after treatment of ruptured intracranial aneurysms: the Cerebral Aneurysm Rerupture After Treatment (CARAT) study. Stroke 2008;39:120–25

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
30. 30.↵
    1. Molyneux AJ,
    2. Kerr RS,
    3. Birks J,
    4. et al

    . Risk of recurrent subarachnoid haemorrhage, death, or dependence and standardised mortality ratios after clipping or coiling of an intracranial aneurysm in the International Subarachnoid Aneurysm Trial (ISAT): long-term follow-up. Lancet Neurol 2009;8:427–33

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. 31.↵
    1. David CA,
    2. Vishteh AG,
    3. Spetzler RF,
    4. et al

    . Late angiographic follow-up review of surgically treated aneurysms. J Neurosurg 1999;91:396–401

    PubMedWeb of Science
32. 32.↵
    1. Dehdashti AR,
    2. Thines L,
    3. Da Costa LB,
    4. et al

    . Intraoperative biplanar rotational angiography during neurovascular surgery: technical note. J Neurosurg 2009;111:188–92

    CrossRefPubMed
33. 33.↵
    1. Schaller K,
    2. Kotowski M,
    3. Pereira V,
    4. et al

    . From intraoperative angiography to advanced intraoperative imaging: the Geneva experience. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2011;109:111–15

    CrossRefPubMed
34. 34.↵
    1. Pruvo J-P

    . Opening press conference. In: Proceedings of the Annual Congress les Journées Françaises de Radiologie, October 22–26 2010; Paris, France
35. 35.↵
    1. Prell D,
    2. Kyriakou Y,
    3. Struffert T,
    4. et al

    . Metal artifact reduction for clipping and coiling in interventional C-arm CT. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2010;31:634–39

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
36. 36.↵
    1. Van der Molen AJ,
    2. Veldkamp WJ,
    3. Geleijns J

    . 16-slice CT: achievable effective doses of common protocols in comparison with recent CT dose surveys. Br J Radiol 2007;80:248–55. Epub 2006 Oct 12

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
37. 37.↵
    Bundesamt fuer Strahlenschutz, Diagnostische Referenzwerte fuer radiologische Untersuchungen. Bundesanzeiger: 2003;143:17503–10
38. 38.↵
    1. Kyriakou Y,
    2. Richter G,
    3. Dorfler A,
    4. et al

    . Neuroradiologic applications with routine C-arm flat panel detector CT: evaluation of patient dose measurements. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2008;29:1930–36

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. 39.↵
    1. Schueler BA,
    2. Kallmes DF,
    3. Cloft HJ

    . 3D cerebral angiography: radiation dose comparison with digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1898–901

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
40. 40.↵
    1. Kolditz D,
    2. Kyriakou Y,
    3. Kalender WA

    . Volume-of-interest (VOI) imaging in C-arm flat-detector CT for high image quality at reduced dose. Med Phys 2010;37:2719–30

    CrossRefPubMed
41. 41.↵
    1. Feuerberg I,
    2. Lindquist C,
    3. Lindqvist M,
    4. et al

    . Natural history of postoperative aneurysm rests. J Neurosurg 1987;66:30–34

    PubMedWeb of Science
42. 42.↵
    1. Brenner H,
    2. Gefeller O

    . Variation of sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratios and predictive values with disease prevalence. Stat Med 1997;16:981–91

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. 43.↵
    1. van der Schaaf I,
    2. van Leeuwen M,
    3. Vlassenbroek A,
    4. et al

    . Minimizing clip artifacts in multi CT angiography of clipped patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:60–66

    Abstract/FREE Full Text