Theoretical Basis of Hemodynamic MR Imaging Techniques to Measure Cerebral Blood Volume, Cerebral Blood Flow, and Permeability

References

1. ↵
   Fisel CR, Ackerman JL, Buxton RB, et al. MR contrast due to microscopically heterogeneous magnetic susceptibility: numerical simulations and applications to cerebral physiology. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:336–47

   PubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   Kiselev VG. On the theoretical basis of perfusion measurements by dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 2001;46:1113–22

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
3. ↵
   Donahue KM, Krouwer HG, Rand SD, et al. Utility of simultaneously acquired gradient-echo and spin-echo cerebral blood volume and morphology maps in brain tumor patients. Magn Reson Med 2000;43:845–53

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Miyati T, Banno T, Mase M, et al. Dual dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:230–35

   PubMed
5. ↵
   Barbier EL, den Boer JA, Peters AR, et al. A model of the dual effect of gadopentetate dimeglumine on dynamic brain MR images. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:242–53

   CrossRefPubMed
6. ↵
   Weisskoff R, Zuo C, Boxerman J, et al. Microscopic susceptibility variation and transverse relaxation: theory and experiment. Magn Reson Med 1994;31:601–10

   PubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Zaharchuk G, Mandeville JB, Bogdanov AA Jr, et al. Cerebrovascular dynamics of autoregulation and hypoperfusion: an MRI study of CBF and changes in total and microvascular cerebral blood volume during hemorrhagic hypotension. Stroke 1999;30:2197–205

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
8. Zaharchuk G, Yamada M, Shimizu-Sasamata M, et al. Is all perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for stroke equal? The temporal evolution of multiple hemodynamic parameters after focal ischemia in rats correlated with evidence of infarction. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 2000;20:1341–51

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Dennie J, Mandeville JB, Boxerman JL, et al. NMR imaging of changes in vascular morphology due to tumor angiogenesis. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:793–99

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. ↵
    Lassen NA, Perl W. Tracer Kinetic Methods in Medical Physiology. New York: Raven Press;1979
11. ↵
    Kety SS, Schmidt CF. The determination of cerebral blood flow in man by the use of nitrous oxide in low concentrations. Am J Physiol 1945;143:53–66

    FREE Full Text
12. ↵
    Yen RT, Fung YC. Inversion of Fahraeus effect and effect of mainstream flow on capillary hematocrit. J Appl Physiol 1977;42:578–86

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
13. ↵
    Hunter GJ, Hamberg LM, Ponzo JA, et al. Assessment of cerebral perfusion and arterial anatomy in hyperacute stroke with three-dimensional functional CT: early clinical results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1997;19:29–37
14. ↵
    Powers WJ. Cerebral hemodynamics in ischemic cerebrovascular disease. Ann Neurol 1991;29:231–40

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
15. ↵
    de Crespigny A, Rother J, van Bruggen N, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging assessment of cerebral hemodynamics during spreading depression in rats. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1998;18:1008–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
16. ↵
    Zierler K. Theoretical basis of indicator-dilution methods for measuring flow and volume. Circ Research 1962;10:393–407

    FREE Full Text
17. ↵
    Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, Chesler DA, et al. High resolution measurement of cerebral blood flow using intravascular tracer bolus passages. Part I. Mathematical approach and statistical analysis. Magn Reson Med 1996;36:715–25

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
18. ↵
    Alsop DC, Wedmid A, Schlaug G. Defining a local arterial input function for perfusion quantification with bolus contrast MRI. Proceedings of Tenth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 18–24, 2002. Honolulu, Hawaii: ISMRM;2002 :659
19. ↵
    Lorenz C, Benner T, Lopez CJ, et al. Effect of using local arterial input functions on cerebral blood flow estimation. J Magn Reson Imaging 2006;24:57–65

    CrossRefPubMed
20. ↵
    Jochimsen TH, Newbould RD, Skare ST, et al. Identifying systematic errors in quantitative dynamic-susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging by high-resolution multi-echo parallel EPI. NMR Biomed 2007;20:429–38

    CrossRefPubMed
21. ↵
    Rempp KA, Brix G, Wenz F, et al. Quantitation of cerebral blood flow and volume with dynamic susceptibility contrast-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1994;193:637–41

    PubMedWeb of Science
22. ↵
    Bretscher O. Linear Algebra with Application. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall;2005
23. ↵
    Stewart GN. Researches on the circulation time in organs and on the influences which affect it. Parts I-III. J Physiol (London) 1894;15:1
24. ↵
    Wintermark M, Flanders AE, Velthuis B, et al. Perfusion-CT assessment of infarct core and penumbra: receiver operating characteristic curve analysis in 130 patients suspected of acute hemispheric stroke. Stroke 2006;37:979–85

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
25. ↵
    Shih LC, Saver JL, Alger JR, et al. Perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging thresholds identifying core, irreversibly infarcted tissue. Stroke 2003;34:1425–30

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
26. ↵
    Albers GW, Thijs VN, Wechsler L, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging profiles predict clinical response to early reperfusion: the diffusion and perfusion imaging evaluation for understanding stroke evolution (DEFUSE) study. Ann Neurol 2006;60:508–17

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
27. ↵
    Calamante F, Gadian DG, Connelly A. Delay and dispersion effects in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: simulations using singular value decomposition. Magn Reson Med 2000;44:466–73

    CrossRefPubMed
28. ↵
    Wu O, Ostergaard L, Weisskoff RM, et al. Tracer arrival timing-insensitive technique for estimating flow in MR perfusion-weighted imaging using singular value decomposition with a block-circulant deconvolution matrix. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:164–74

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
29. ↵
    Dixon WT, Du LN, Faul DD, et al. Projection angiograms of blood labelled by adiabatic fast passage. Magn Reson Med 1986;3:454–62

    PubMed
30. ↵
    Detre JA, Leigh JS, Williams DS, et al. Perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1992;23:37–45

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
31. ↵
    Zaharchuk G, Ledden P, Kwong K, et al. Multislice perfusion and perfusion territory imaging in humans with separate label and image coils. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:1093–98

    CrossRefPubMed
32. ↵
    Hendrikse J, van der Grond J, Lu H, et al. Flow territory mapping of the cerebral arteries with regional perfusion MRI. Stroke 2004;35:882–87

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. ↵
    Guenther M, Oshio K, Feinberg DA. Single-shot 3D imaging techniques improve arterial spin labeling perfusion measurements. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:491–98

    CrossRefPubMed
34. ↵
    Garcia DM, Duhamel G, Alsop DC. Efficiency of inversion pulses for background suppressed arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2005;54:366–72

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
35. ↵
    Edelman R, Siewert B, Darby D, et al. Qualitative mapping of cerebral blood flow and functional localization with echo-planar MR imaging and signal targeting with alternating radio frequency. Radiology 1994;192:513–20

    PubMedWeb of Science
36. ↵
    Kwong KK, Chesler DA, Weisskoff RM, et al. MR perfusion studies with T1-weighted echo planar imaging. Magn Reson Med 1995;34:878–87

    PubMedWeb of Science
37. ↵
    Roberts DA, Detre JA, Bolinger L, et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of human brain perfusion at 1.5 T using steady-state inversion of arterial water. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1994;91:33–37

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. ↵
    Garcia DM, de Bazelaire C, Alsop DC. Pseudo-continuous flow-driven adiabatic inversion for arterial spin labeling. Proceedings of Thirteenth Scientific Meeting and Exhibition of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, May 7–13, 2005. Miami, Fla: ISMRM;2005 :37
39. ↵
    Wong EC, Cronin M, Wu W-C, et al. Velocity-selective arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 2006;55:1334–41

    CrossRefPubMed
40. ↵
    Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, et al. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:383–96

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
41. ↵
    Parkes LM, Tofts PS. Improved accuracy of human cerebral blood perfusion measurements using arterial spin labeling: accounting for capillary water permeability. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:27–41

    CrossRefPubMed
42. ↵
    Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. A theoretical and experimental comparison of continuous and pulsed arterial spin labeling techniques for quantitative perfusion imaging. Magn Reson Med 1998;40:348–55

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
43. ↵
    Wang J, Alsop DC, Li L, et al. Comparison of quantitative perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling at 1.5 and 4.0 Tesla. Magn Reson Med 2002;48:242–54

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
44. ↵
    Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Implementation of quantitative perfusion imaging techniques for functional brain mapping using pulsed arterial spin labeling. NMR Biomed 1997;10:237–49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. ↵
    Donahue MJ, Lu H, Jones CK, et al. An account of the discrepancy between MRI and PET cerebral blood flow measure: a high-field MRI investigation. NMR Biomed 2006;19:1043–54

    CrossRefPubMed
46. ↵
    Wong EC, Buxton RB, Frank LR. Quantitative imaging of perfusion using a single subtraction (QUIPSS and QUIPSS II). Magn Reson Med 1998;39:702–08

    PubMedWeb of Science
47. ↵
    Alsop DC, Detre JA. Reduced transit time sensitivity in noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging of human cerebral blood flow. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1996;16:1236–49

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
48. ↵
    Tofts PS. Modeling tracer kinetics in dynamic Gd-DTPA MR imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 1997;7:91–101

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
49. ↵
    Tofts PS, Kermode AG. Measurement of the blood-brain barrier permeability and leakage space using dynamic MR imaging. 1. Fundamental concepts. Magn Reson Med 1991;17:357–67

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
50. ↵
    Cha S, Yang L, Johnson G, et al. Comparison of microvascular permeability measurements, K(trans), determined with conventional steady-state T1-weighted and first-pass T2*-weighted MR imaging methods in gliomas and meningiomas. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2006;27:409–17

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
51. ↵
    Johnson G, Wetzel SG, Cha S, et al. Measuring blood volume and vascular transfer constant from dynamic, T(2)*-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI. Magn Reson Med 2004;51:961–68

    CrossRefPubMed
52. ↵
    Weisskoff RM, Boxerman JL, Sorensen AG, et al. Simultaneous blood volume and permeability mapping using a single Gd-based contrast injection. Proceedings of the Twelfth Annual Meeting of the Society for Magnetic Resonance Imaging, San Francisco, Calif;1994 :279
53. ↵
    Buckley DL. Uncertainty in the analysis of tracer kinetics using dynamic contrast-enhanced T1-weighted MRI. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:601–06

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science