Contrast-Enhanced 3D MR Angiography of the Carotid Artery: Comparison with Conventional Digital Subtraction Angiography

References

1. ↵
   North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. Beneficial effect of carotid endarterectomiy in symptomatic patients with high-grade carotid stenosis. N Engl J Med 1991;325:445–453

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
2. ↵
   The (NASCET) North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Steering Committee. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial: methods, patients characteristics and progress. Stroke 1991;22:711–720

   Abstract/FREE Full Text
3. European Carotid Surgery Trials Collaborative Group. MRC European carotid surgery trial: interim results for symptomatic patients with severe (70–99%) or mild (0–29%) carotid stenosis. Lancet 1991;337:1235–1243

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
4. ↵
   Hobson RW II, Weiss DG, Fields WS, et al. Efficacy of carotid endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid stenosis. The Veterans Affairs Cooperative Study Group. N Engl J Med 1993;328:221–227

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
5. ↵
   Endarterectomy for asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Executive Committee for the Asymptomatic Carotid Atherosclerosis Study. JAMA 1995;273:1421–1428

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
6. ↵
   Barnett HJ, Taylor DW, Eliasziw M, et al. Benefit of carotid endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic moderate or severe stenosis: North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial Collaborators. N Engl J Med 1998;339:1415–1425

   CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
7. ↵
   Levy RA, Prince MR. Arterial-phase three-dimensional contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid artery. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:211–215

   PubMed
8. Krinsky G, Rofsky N, Flyer M, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of acquired arch vessel disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1996;167:981–987

   PubMedWeb of Science
9. ↵
   Remonda L, Heid O, Schroth G. Carotid artery stenosis, occlusion, and pseudo-occlusion: first-pass, gadolinium-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography—preliminary study. Radiology 1998;209:95–102

   PubMedWeb of Science
10. Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Nicol L, Pruvo JP. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the craniocervical vessels: a review. Neuroradiology 1999;41:867–874

    CrossRefPubMed
11. Sardanelli F, Zandrino F, Parodi RC, De Caro G. MR angiography of internal carotid arteries: breath-hold Gd-enhanced 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession versus unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:208–215

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
12. Cloft HJ, Murphy KJ, Prince MR, Brunberg JA. 3D gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries. Magn Reson Imaging 1996;14:593–600

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
13. ↵
    Serfaty JM, Chirossel P, Chevallier JM, Ecochard R, Froment JC, Douek PC. Accuracy of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography in the assessment of extracranial carotid artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;175:455–463

    PubMedWeb of Science
14. ↵
    Cloft HJ, Kallmes DF. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography for carotid artery disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1999;172:833–834

    PubMed
15. Scarabino T, Carriero A, Giannatempo GM, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CE MRA) in the study of the carotid stenosis: comparison with digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Neuroradiology 1999;26:87–91
16. Slosman F, Stolpen AH, Lexa FJ, et al. Extracranial atherosclerotic carotid artery disease: evaluation of non-breath-hold three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 1998;170:489–495

    PubMed
17. Willig DS, Turski PA, Frayne R, et al. Contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA of the carotid artery bifurcation: preliminary study of comparison with unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight MR angiography. Radiology 1998;208:447–451

    PubMed
18. Martinat P, Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Giboreau F, Pruvo JP. Contribution of fast-sequence three-dimensional MRI angiography with gadolinium injection in the evaluation of supra-aortic vessels. J Radiol 1998;79:673–680

    PubMedWeb of Science
19. Jager HR, Moore EA, Bynevelt M, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography in patients with carotid artery stenosis: comparison of two different techniques with an unenhanced 2D time-of-flight sequence. Neuroradiology 2000;42:240–248

    CrossRefPubMed
20. Huston J 3rd, Fain SB, Wald JT, et al. Carotid artery: elliptic centric contrast-enhanced MR angiography compared with conventional angiography. Radiology 2001;218:138–143

    PubMed
21. Sardanelli F, Zandrino F, Parodi RC, De Caro G. MR angiography of internal carotid arteries: breath-hold Gd-enhanced 3D fast imaging with steady-state precession versus unenhanced 2D and 3D time-of-flight techniques. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23:208–215
22. ↵
    Leclerc X, Martinat P, Godefroy O, et al. Contrast-enhanced three-dimensional fast imaging with steady-state precession (FISP) MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: preliminary results. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1405–1413

    Abstract
23. Kim JK, Farb RI, Wright GA. Test bolus examination in the carotid artery at dynamic gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography. Radiology 1998;206:283–289.

    PubMed
24. Leclerc X, Gauvrit JY, Nicol L, Martinat P, Pruvo JP. Gadolinium-enhanced fast three-dimensional angiography of the neck: technical aspect. Invest Radiol 1999;34:204–210

    PubMed
25. ↵
    Kollias SS, Binkert CA, Ruesch S, Valavanis A. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the supra-aortic vessels in 24 seconds: a feasibility study. Neuroradiology 1999;41:391–400

    CrossRefPubMed
26. Aoki S, Nakajima H, Kumagai H, Araki T. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR angiography and MR imaging of the carotid artery: high-resolution sequences in different acquisition planes. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:381–385

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
27. Fellner FA, Fellner C, Wutke R, et al. Fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced 3D MR DSA and 3D time-of-flight turbo MRA of the carotid arteries: first clinical experiences in correlation with ultrasound, x-ray angiography, and endarterectomy findings. Magn Reson Imaging 2000;18:575–585

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
28. Melhem ER, Serfaty JM, Jones L, et al. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography: the effects of k-space truncation on luminal representation in a carotid artery phantom model. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1028–1031

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
29. ↵
    Huston J 3rd, Fain SB, Riederer SJ, Wilman AH, Bernstein MA, Busse RF. Carotid arteries: maximizing arterial to venous contrast in fluoroscopically triggered contrast-enhanced MR angiography with elliptic centric view ordering. Radiology 1999;211:265–273

    PubMedWeb of Science
30. Isoda H, Takehara Y, Isogai S, et al. Software-triggered contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the intracranial arteries. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2000;174:371–375

    PubMed
31. Korosec FR, Turski PA, Carroll TJ, Mistretta CA, Grist TM. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid bifurcation. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999;10:317–325

    CrossRefPubMed
32. Melhem ER, Caruthers SD, Faddoul SG, Tello R, Jara H. Use of three-dimensional MR angiography for tracking a contrast bolus in the carotid artery. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:263–266

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
33. Isoda H, Takehara Y, Isogai S, et al. Technique for arterial-phase contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography of the carotid and vertebral arteries. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1241–1244

    Abstract
34. Kaandorp DW, Kopinga K, Wijn PF. Venous signal suppression in 3D dynamic Gd-enhanced carotid artery imaging using the eigenimage filter. Magn Reson Med 1999;42:307–313

    PubMed
35. Steffens JC, Link J, Heller M. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the cervical arteries. Invest Radiol 1998;33:573–577

    PubMed
36. Krinsky G, Maya M, Rofsky N, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced 3D MRA of the aortic arch vessels in the detection of atherosclerotic cerebrovascular occlusive disease. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1998;22:167–178

    CrossRefPubMed
37. Leclerc X, Nicol L, Gauvrit JY, Le Thuc V, Leys D, Pruvo JP. Contrast-enhanced MR angiography of supraaortic vessels: the effect of voxel size on image quality. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2000;21:1021–1027

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
38. ↵
    Leclerc X, Lucas C, Godefroy O, et al. Preliminary experience using contrast-enhanced MR angiography to assess vertebral artery structure for the follow-up of suspected dissection. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1482–1490

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
39. ↵
    Vanninen RL, Manninen HI, Koivisto K, et al. Carotid stenosis by digital subtraction angiography reproducibility of the European Carotid Surgery Trial and the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial measurement methods and visual interpretation. AJNR Am J Roentgenol 1994;15:1635–1641
40. Brown PM, Johnston KW. The difficulty of quantifying the severity of carotid stenosis. Surgery 1992;92:468–473
41. Rothwell PM, Gibson RJ, Slattery J, Warlow CP. Prognostic value and reproducibility of measurement of carotid stenosis: a comparison of three methods on 1001 angiograms. Stroke 1994;25:2440–2444

    Abstract/FREE Full Text
42. Fox AJ. How to measure carotid stenosis. Radiology 1993;186:316–318

    PubMedWeb of Science
43. ↵
    Vanninnen RL, Manninen HI, Partanen PK, Tulla H, Vainio PA. How should we estimate carotid stenosis using magnetic resonance angiography? Neuroradiology 1996;38:299–305

    PubMed
44. Staikov IN, Arnold M, Mattle HP, et al. Comparison of the ECST, CC, and NASCET grading methods and ultrasound for assessing carotid stenosis. European Carotid Surgery Trial. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial. J Neurol 2000;247:681–686.

    CrossRefPubMedWeb of Science
45. ↵
    Huston J III, Lewis BD, Wiebers DO, Meyer FB, Riederer SJ, Weaver AL. Carotid artery: prospective blinded comparison of two-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography with conventional angiography and duplex US. Radiology 1993;186:339–344

    PubMedWeb of Science
46. ↵
    Wetzel S, Boos M, Bongartz G, Radu EW. Selection of patients for carotid thromboendarterectomy: the role of magnetic resonance angiography. J Comput Assist Tomogr 1999;23(suppl 1):S91–S94
47. ↵
    Rofsky NM, Adelman MA. Gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography of the carotid arteries: a small step, a giant leap? Radiology 1998;209:31–34

    PubMed